NVidia GeForce RTX 50x0 cards - 70% performance increase, but AI > you

Izo

Izo

Tranny Chaser
21,628
31,311
1709490244610.jpeg

www.techradar.com

Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 could be up to 70% faster than the 4090, but its best chips might be reserved for AI

RTX 5090 could be powerful and expensive
www.techradar.com www.techradar.com
www.techradar.com

Nvidia 5000 series: rumors, possible GPU specs, and everything we know

Everything we know about the Nvidia 5000 series of RTX GPUs
www.techradar.com www.techradar.com
www.nvidia.com

NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation Graphics Card

Performance for endless possibilities.
www.nvidia.com
 
  • 3Mother of God
  • 3Like
  • 1Weird Boner
Reactions: 6 users
Izo

Izo

Tranny Chaser
21,628
31,311
Are you going to simp for nvidia, sell you dogecoins for the 5090?
 
Bubbles

Bubbles

2022 Asshat Award Winner
<Bronze Donator>
48,520
-83,248
since I got a 4090 that means 5000 series and maybe even 6000 series offer nothing. Unless some crazy AI feature is added which makes it almost mandatory to have
 
  • 2Like
Reactions: 1 users
Izo

Izo

Tranny Chaser
21,628
31,311
Bubbles said:
since I got a 4090 that means 5000 series and maybe even 6000 series offer nothing. Unless some crazy AI feature is added which makes it almost mandatory to have
Click to expand...
Simp for Alinity or generate new thots. Decisions, decisions.
 
  • 3Worf
  • 1Galaxy Brain
Reactions: 3 users
Mist

Mist

REEEEeyore
<Banned>
31,854
24,688
I will end up paying whatever MSRP costs to get an FE card.
 
  • 2Mother of God
Reactions: 1 users
Borzak

Borzak

<Bronze Donator>
27,235
36,608
Have to be some very killer game for me to upgrade to something like that anytime soon.
 
  • 1Like
Reactions: 1 user
Penance

Penance

Avatar of War Slayer
9,284
16,451
"UP TO 70% faster then the 4090!"

Sure....

But please continue with the marketing speak so my stocks soar to the moon.
 
  • 2Solidarity
Reactions: 1 users
Springbok

Springbok

Karen
<Gold Donor>
9,911
15,199
There are just now monitors available that can push 4090 to the limit. 5090 is pointless atm
 
slippery

slippery

<Bronze Donator>
7,944
7,760
My 4090 definitely plays the shit out of everything on my 1440p OLED. I see no reason why I need a 4k monitor for gaming
 
  • 4Like
Reactions: 3 users
Chimney

Chimney

Trakanon Raider
1,938
1,469
Springbok said:
Coulda fooled me, on my 4k 240hz monitor..l
Click to expand...

I run 2x Neo G8 Odyssey's (4k / 240hz) and a 4090 with all the bells and whistles anyone could want in a gaming PC.

You 100% aren't running the majority of modern graphically intensive games at 4k at high/ultra with all the crap turned on and getting 240+ fps.

There are endless benchmarks with the 4090 for dozens of popular games that show this.
 
  • 1Like
Reactions: 1 user
sleevedraw

sleevedraw

Revolver Ocelot
<Bronze Donator>
2,292
6,675
70% faster than the 4090!* ** *** ****

* With DLSS on at 8k resolution
** With raytracing, not with raster
*** For 85% higher MSRP
**** At tasks specifically devoted to rendering expensive leather jackets only
 
  • 9Like
  • 6Worf
  • 1Smuggly
Reactions: 16 users
Springbok

Springbok

Karen
<Gold Donor>
9,911
15,199
Ok I’ll rephrase then, I run every game in the world at 4k at reasonably good fps. All a 5090 would give me are more frames. I’m not a pro fps player, and if I was I’d just get a 1080 or 1440p monitor. With dlss available for a bunch of aaa releases this is all pointless, and most graphically intensive new launch aaa games suck.

besides that point, devs are still right now developing titles for ps5 and Xbox. What’s the point of a 5090.
 
  • 1Like
Reactions: 1 user
Hateyou

Hateyou

Not Great, Not Terrible
<Bronze Donator>
18,372
49,799
Springbok said:
Ok I’ll rephrase then, I run every game in the world at 4k at reasonably good fps. All a 5090 would give me are more frames. I’m not a pro fps player, and if I was I’d just get a 1080 or 1440p monitor. With dlss available for a bunch of aaa releases this is all pointless, and most graphically intensive new launch aaa games suck.

besides that point, devs are still right now developing titles for ps5 and Xbox. What’s the point of a 5090.
Click to expand...
It’s 1000 better than your shitty ass 4090
 
  • 8Worf
  • 3Solidarity
Reactions: 10 users
Chimney

Chimney

Trakanon Raider
1,938
1,469
Springbok said:
Ok I’ll rephrase then, I run every game in the world at 4k at reasonably good fps. All a 5090 would give me are more frames. I’m not a pro fps player, and if I was I’d just get a 1080 or 1440p monitor. With dlss available for a bunch of aaa releases this is all pointless, and most graphically intensive new launch aaa games suck.

besides that point, devs are still right now developing titles for ps5 and Xbox. What’s the point of a 5090.
Click to expand...

If we take your subjective opinion aside.

Technology is going to continue regardless if other sectors lag behind.

This year and going forward we're going to see a lot of 4k @ 240hz and other very high refresh rate monitors released.

We as individuals just need to decide if the upgrade cost is worth it based on what we are doing with the PC.

I play pretty much all genre of games so if the card could truly hold or break the maxed settings @ 4k / 240hz threshold and I'm able to always get the best out of any single player game, fps, mmo, indie title etc. then I'd make the swap. If it's something like cyberpunk 2077 goes from 120 -> 180 fps then it'd be a hard pass and my monitors will just continue with unfulfilled potential.

=D
 
Foggy

Foggy

Bronze Baronet of the Realm
6,446
5,093
You aren’t getting anywhere near 120 fps in Cyberpunk at 4k and everything on ultra.
 
  • 1Like
Reactions: 1 user
You must log in or register to reply here.