Wait, are you talking about Arpaio?I have news for you, there is a Sheriff in Arizona that does exactly that.
fucking LOLZ, it's actually pretty appropriate Investigation of Phoenix sheriff Joe Arpaio being handed over to Justice Department
- 2
Wait, are you talking about Arpaio?I have news for you, there is a Sheriff in Arizona that does exactly that.
It isn't for him, it's a badge of honor so where do you go from there?
I'm saying ban him instead. Ban him instead.So you want a special rule in place that Tanoomba is immune from any sort of punishment. Because that's what this amounts to. If someone does something unexpected, like turning every thread in the shaw into their personal bitchfest after doing their dead level best for several days to get shawed, then rules are going to happen to prevent that from occuring again.
It doesn't matter who it is doing it.
But you're now arguing Tanoomba should be immune from that reality.
That is the logical consequence of what you are arguing.
Be it Tanoomba, or me, or Araysar, or someone else, throwing a huge shit fit in the Shaw and turning every thread into our cowardly little bitchfest where we're quoting people from other parts of the forums and lashing out at them, what have you, some rule would be put in place to prevent that from occurring, but because its Tanoomba, he should get away with it scot free.
Thank you, Soy, for demonstrating the gross double standard that the old mod team had towards Tanoomba.
He is sacrosanct because he has enshrined himself as a "voice of the underdog" with the old mod team, and there is little to nothing they won't do to defend that decision.
When all you have are insults, are we done here?
Why do we give a shit how he looks at it? He's been removed from discussion which is the important thing. Before you got involved and drew all this attention to him there were maybe 2 people that would bother clicking on his shitty thread in the rickshaw. If it wasn't punishment for him he wouldn't be in there throwing a temper tantrum. The best method for dealing with idiots like him is to ignore him and let him wallow. Changing rules for him is the worst thing you can do because.now he knows he got under your skin so he now knows his tantrum was a success.It isn't for him, it's a badge of honor so where do you go from there?
I'm saying ban him instead. Ban him instead.
hodj, just in case you missed it: ban him instead.
EDIT: ban him instead. Copy?
Why do we give a shit how he looks at it? He's been removed from discussion which is the important thing. Before you got involved and drew all this attention to him there were maybe 2 people that would bother clicking on his shitty thread in the rickshaw. If it wasn't punishment for him he wouldn't be in there throwing a temper tantrum. The best method for dealing with idiots like him is to ignore him and let him wallow. Changing rules for him is the worst thing you can do because.now he knows he got under your skin so he now knows his tantrum was a success.
Not when you can sit in there and quote from elsewhere on the forum and throw a shit fit and get attention.
Be it Tanoomba, or me, or Araysar, or someone else, throwing a huge shit fit in the Shaw and turning every thread into our cowardly little bitchfest where we're quoting people from other parts of the forums and lashing out at them, what have you, some rule would be put in place to prevent that from occurring, but because its Tanoomba, he should get away with it scot free.
It isn't an insult. Its a statement of fact. Its the exact same functional equivalent of asking "Why do you talk about "insert fictional mythological entity here" if you don't believe he exists!"
Its insipid stupidity. The only rational response is to point this out, or, as Dave Chapelle puts it
I guess tanoomba really is the best troll of all time.
I'm saying ban him instead. Ban him instead.
hodj, just in case you missed it: ban him instead.
EDIT: ban him instead. Copy?
Bitch, please. Had Draegan locked Big P's thread because Tanoomba was being a faggot, I would have been calling that shit out as well. You keep projecting your obsession with Tanoomba on me and it couldn't be more misplaced.Had a_skeleton_03 just done that instead, you'd all be here bitching about that as well.
Don't even try to deny it.
You're throwing anything at the wall hoping it sticks.
Changing rules for him is the worst thing you can do because.now he knows he got under your skin so he now knows his tantrum was a success.
Had a_skeleton_03 just done that instead, you'd all be here bitching about that as well.
Don't even try to deny it.
You're throwing anything at the wall hoping it sticks.
So do you think that Tanoomba derives no pleasure in having access to the rest of the forum?
Huh. I can only speak for myself here but I argued pretty vociferously against Araysar being banned.
Bitch, please. Had Draegan locked Big P's thread because Tanoomba was being a faggot, I would have been calling that shit out as well. You keep projecting your obsession with Tanoomba on me and it couldn't be more misplaced.
So then this is ONLY about Picasso's thread, because you like him. So you have no issue with the other threads being moved?Bitch, please. Had Draegan locked Big P's thread because Tanoomba was being a faggot, I would have been calling that shit out as well. You keep projecting your obsession with Tanoomba on me and it couldn't be more misplaced.
I'm still trying to figure out why anything needed to be done in the first place.
It's called an example. If Draegan made the same rule you did, all the usual suspects would have been bitching about it(and rightly so).So then this is ONLY about Picasso's thread, because you like him. So you have no issue with the other threads being moved?
Once again you have avoided it like 10 times. Why can't Picasso (and the others) have a personal thread in screenshots?
Who's experience is being ruined by three threads moved?It's a fine argument that being rickshawed isnt enough of a punishment for some people, but instead of ruining it for other posters perhaps think of alternatives before hard lining your own personal ideals.
Once again you have avoided it like 10 times. Why can't Picasso (and the others) have a personal thread in screenshots?It's called an example. If Draegan made the same rule you did, all the usual suspects would have been bitching about it(and rightly so).