Imagine someone doing something like Battle of the Bulge in the "300" style.Whats wrong with it? Looks better than 99% of the shit Hollywood puts out.
Maybe they should make a stylized slo-mo version of Schindler's List instead then, if the actual subject matter is just too depressing for you?I think it looks good. If I wanted to see a super realistic portrayal of Stalingrad I'd watch one of the many documentaries about it.
Anyway, a "real" depiction of Stalingrad would be depressing as fuck and more along the lines of Schindler's List. There's a time and place for that kind of movie, but there's also room for more stylized WW2 movies.
I'm really hoping they pull a Tarantino and have Hitler die in a hail of gunfire when he arrives at Stalingrad to lead the final German assault on the city.Maybe they should make a stylized slo-mo version of Schindler's List instead then, if the actual subject matter is just too depressing for you?
How the fuck can you tell this from a preview in which no words are spoken?As someone who has read extensively about Stalingrad this movie looks like a big piece of shit, the biggest gut punch is that it comes from a Russian director who should know better than to turn this material into some Michael Bay abomination
Summaries of the plot are on the internet. Its a bastardization of the Pavlov's House story with a love story tacked on to it. Plus shitty 3D + slo mo.How the fuck can you tell this from a preview in which no words are spoken?
Also sucked major ass.I thought Enemy at the Gates was a great movie for telling the story of Stalingrad.