Sarkeesian doesn't claim to be a moral authority either, and she certainly doesn't use her authority to control other people, unless you've got evidence that shows otherwise (protip: You don't).
She's not trying to oppress anyone, unless you've got evidence that shows otherwise (you don't). She literally created content that expressed her point of view, including her concerns. That's it. Your feels-based arguments are getting weaker and weaker. Again, the fact that she offends your snowflake sensibilities does not mean she is causing harm. You'd make a great SJW with this hand-wringing busybodyism, though. I think you missed your calling.
How does Sarkeesian claim to be a moral authority? She did claim to be an "expert" on how women are portrayed in video games (for whatever that's worth), but that has nothing to do with moral authority. If there are other claims she has made as to her authority, moral or otherwise, feel free to present them. I know you're not used to backing up your arguments, but there's a first time for everything, right?
...And? Do you have a point to go along with that picture?Dude comeon
She was invited to speak there, right? As someone who was excessively targeted for online harassment, her perspective was deemed valuable. How does that mean she's claiming moral authority?
I've never said nor implied this.
Except YOU, right? When YOU'RE offended, it's because people are causing REAL HARM and making the world a WORSE PLACE by expressing their points of view, right?
Well, that's what your feels tell you, anyway. After all, you wouldn't be so offended if it weren't truly harmful, right? Think about the trolls' burner accounts, man!
