Why was it so bad? Not trying to be an ass, genuinely wondering.This movie was fucking terrible. I cannot believe I even watched it for free.
1/10
Shit plot and story. 100% felt like they got away from what made the original running man good.Why was it so bad? Not trying to be an ass, genuinely wondering.
So the original running Man movie was better correct?Shit plot and story. 100% felt like they got away from what made the original running man good.
the forced lines trying to be funny like Arnold was abysmal. All the people coming together to fight the evil capitalist at the end was beyond retarded. Honestly I don’t even remember the end. I think Josh Brolin the bad guy died.
spoiler alert movie sucked cock
I started off liking it at the beginning, thinking it was gonna be like a side quest in cyberpunk and it just went to shit.So the original running Man movie was better correct?
I guess the point or the question I'm asking is whether or not the movie is fun or entertaining compared to the original and that sounds like it isn't, or at least that's what you think.
It's not like the damn Stephen King story was some highbrow fiction, so I'm not even going to take that stuff into account. Who knows how much Colombian marching powder he did when he even wrote The novella.
Sounds like it's just a bad movie then compared to the first one.
Fair enough, I want to say the Oliver Harper guy that I posted his review of said the third act kind of didn't stick The landing.I started off liking it at the beginning, thinking it was gonna be like a side quest in cyberpunk and it just went to shit.