The Tanoubliette: Pussy Hurt and Delusions or TTPHAD for short.
- Thread starter hodj
- Start date
- Status
Tanoomba
ジョーディーすれいやー
- 10,170
- 1,439
Chaos: "Bro, again, if you are saying that her statements can't be quantified and there isn't peer-reviewed research then wtf are we debating? Feelsdata? Come on."
I've generally been arguing (like, since Sark was first mentioned) that claims made to support the "liar, fraud and con artist" narrative are often factually inaccurate and usually counterproductive. You came in with what I guess you saw as pretty solid examples of criticism that might legitimately support those claims (Sark's use of "encourage" and the implication that she says games "cause misogyny"). I have acknowledged and understood your points, disagreed on a few fundamental things, and tried to explain myself as clearly as I can. We started going in circles because we reached an impasse, where neither side is buying what the other is selling. I made more use of evidence than you did, IIRC. But who's counting, right?
What did you think we were debating?
I've generally been arguing (like, since Sark was first mentioned) that claims made to support the "liar, fraud and con artist" narrative are often factually inaccurate and usually counterproductive. You came in with what I guess you saw as pretty solid examples of criticism that might legitimately support those claims (Sark's use of "encourage" and the implication that she says games "cause misogyny"). I have acknowledged and understood your points, disagreed on a few fundamental things, and tried to explain myself as clearly as I can. We started going in circles because we reached an impasse, where neither side is buying what the other is selling. I made more use of evidence than you did, IIRC. But who's counting, right?
What did you think we were debating?
khalid
Unelected Mod
- 14,071
- 6,775
Just saying over and over that your made up definition of "encourage" is the correct one is no evidence whatsoever.
- 19,525
- 72,216
WOW WHO COULD HAVE PREDICTED TANOOMBA WOULD TURN THIS INTO A MULTIPAGE DEBATE ABOUT THE MEANINGS OF WORDS? A TWIST WORTHY OF M. NIGHT SHAMDONG!
chaos
Buzzfeed Editor
- 17,324
- 4,841
I apologize bro, I am not being clear. If it is all feelsdata and opinion, can't be quantified, there's no real studies to back up any of this, then why care about it at all? The definitions of the words she uses in her glorified YouTube rant don't really matter if all of this is for nothing.
Tanoomba
ジョーディーすれいやー
- 10,170
- 1,439
Chaos: "I apologize bro, I am not being clear. If it is all feelsdata and opinion, can't be quantified, there's no real studies to back up any of this, then why care about it at all? The definitions of the words she uses in her glorified YouTube rant don't really matter if all of this is for nothing."
Well, I've already told you why I'm invested in the topic. I've pretty much always been of the opinion that what Sark says doesn't really matter, though. Why do you care?
Well, I've already told you why I'm invested in the topic. I've pretty much always been of the opinion that what Sark says doesn't really matter, though. Why do you care?
hodj
Vox Populi Jihadi
- 31,673
- 18,384
Not even Nostradamus, Enoch, and Elijah could have reached far enough into the future to project the outcome of this one!
hodj
Vox Populi Jihadi
- 31,673
- 18,384
And this is why the assumption he can ever be forced to realize he's been backed into a corner on this issue is folly, and he should just be banned.
- 17,781
- 25,897
Tan you admitted last year that you gave her money. Don't act like you don't care.
By the way, may I ask how much? I mean, $10 or whatever is one thing, but you defend this buffoon like you send her monthy tithes or something.
By the way, may I ask how much? I mean, $10 or whatever is one thing, but you defend this buffoon like you send her monthy tithes or something.
- Status