The Tanoubliette: Pussy Hurt and Delusions or TTPHAD for short.

hodj_sl said:

Things I take more seriously than Tanoomba

Click to expand...

Reminder: Jhodi believes that hollow and pointless shitposts can act as a "get out of defending his shitty argument free" card. Can't make this up.

Reminder: Jhodi believes that drawing attention to the many flaws in his argument (that he has never addressed, naturally) = attempting to restart a debate.

I swear to God I'm not joking.

- Jhodi

Claims I lost the debate. Has never addressed why it's wrong to demand proof of a crime before concluding someone's guilty. Has never even acknowledged the many problems with his own argument. Claims victory anyway.
#justjhodithings

To be fair, there's an above-decent chance Jhodi is just trolling. He's made it clear he's more interested in scoring imaginary points against me than he is in making any arguments that have merit. This would explain his extreme laziness and sloppiness when it comes to his recent debate "style". I take satisfaction from the fact that, trolling or no, Jhodi's argument is so shitty that he won't even attempt to defend it. This is very much the closest we can get to Jhodi admitting he's wrong. He didn't do his homework, I did mine, and in the end he failed to support his argument while mine was consistently shown to not only hold water, but be the only logical stance to take in this particular situation (reminder: We don't know what happened with Sulkowicz).

Jhodi is welcome to try to prove me wrong, but he won't. That would require being held accountable for his actual words, something he is very much averse to. He'd much rather play make believe by repeating to himself that he "won" the game he made up in his head (see next post).

Above: A confession that Jhodi's trolling.

Above: More fingers-in-ears singing "lalalalala".

Tanoomba_sl said:

Things Jhodi has not addressed:

- How the Facebook messages contradict Sulkowicz's description of her relationship with Nungesser.
- Why we should accept non sequitur as conclusive evidence of anything.
- Why this supposed "evidence" holds any weight despite being dismissed by an actual court.
- Why we should accept Jhodi as an arbiter of what is "reasonable".
- Why, when we have plenty of cases of proven false rape accusations, we should not require the same burden of proof to be met in this case before concluding that Sulkowicz is lying.
- Why demanding hard evidence before concluding that someone has committed a serious crime is being an SJW retard.

All of these gaping holes in his argument, and yet he's still comfortable enough to claim victory.

Click to expand...

^

Jesus Christ. You guys are both horrible people. And this is coming from a Nazi

hodj_sl said:

Say what you will about Adolf, but that motherfucker knew how to make a nation dress for a party.

Click to expand...

I actually don't own any Hugo Boss clothing.

You might be right.