Quaid
Trump's Staff
- 11,860
- 8,266
I dunno. You didn't seem to have a problem with Anita Sarkeesian doing it with Hitman.
The Tanoubliette: Pussy Hurt and Delusions or TTPHAD for short.
- Thread starter hodj
- Start date
- Status
Quaid
Trump's Staff
- 11,860
- 8,266
That's right Tan, I carefully concocted that sentence to derive perverse pleasure from your inevitable tears.
- 19,525
- 72,216
Tanoomba
ジョーディーすれいやー
- 10,170
- 1,439
Quaid: "I dunno. You didn't seem to have a problem with Anita Sarkeesian doing it with Hitman."
Doing what? Hitman was a valid example of a game containing the trope she was describing. Anyway, it seems like you're getting closer to agreeing that the "quitting Reddit" article is about racist hate speech and not sexual violence but are stopping short... How come?
Quaid: "That's right Tan, I carefully concocted that sentence to derive perverse pleasure from your inevitable tears."
Nothing demonizing there either.
Doing what? Hitman was a valid example of a game containing the trope she was describing. Anyway, it seems like you're getting closer to agreeing that the "quitting Reddit" article is about racist hate speech and not sexual violence but are stopping short... How come?
Quaid: "That's right Tan, I carefully concocted that sentence to derive perverse pleasure from your inevitable tears."
Nothing demonizing there either.
- 19,525
- 72,216
Guys I want to talk about whether or not Anita was talking about hitman. It's been so long since I've slammed my dick in a drawer.
Lithose
Buzzfeed Editor
- 25,946
- 113,041
Don't avoid the post, Tan.
Is Gang rape and fucking sexual abuse/violation hate? It's a simple question, you have avoided for 2 pages now. Yes or no.
Lithose
Buzzfeed Editor
- 25,946
- 113,041
LOL. It is pretty baffling that someone losing points in a game shows developers intending for players to use women as sexual objects.
But an article describing the leak pictures as gang rape, and sexual violence, is not stating they are a form of hate.
Can't explain that!
Lithose
Buzzfeed Editor
- 25,946
- 113,041
LOL.
Well, my work is done here. Next time you casually trying to convince everyone you're genuine Tan, remember you couldn't let your troll routine down for even a second here. lol (You've got to pick your battles, so you can still appear genuine.)
Tanoomba
ジョーディーすれいやー
- 10,170
- 1,439
Khorum: "It really does come down to teaching our boys not to put your dick in crazy.
Even if she DID consent, she can change her mind when you flip her over. She can change her mind on her lonely, bow-legged walk home. She can change her mind when you don't respond to her 276th text. She can even change her mind 30 years later once you're a retired TV megastar.
Just learn to identify crazy and don't put your dick in it."
If she changes her mind when you flip her over, you stop. Are you kidding me with this shit?
Yes, she can change her mind at any point after the fact and falsely accuse you of rape. Luckily, the chances of that happening are exceptionally minuscule, since it basically almost never happens. It's certainly not a problem deserving of the heaps and heaps of attention hand-wringing busybodies everywhere are giving it.
I don't think I've ever heard stupider advice than "don't stick your dick in crazy".
On the surface, it seems entirely logical. Fuck a crazy bitch, get problems. In reality, however, it's not something that can be put into action with any kind of consistency or reliability.
The biggest problem is: How do you define "crazy"? I mean, I'm sure you can think of some extreme examples (violent mood swings, heavy drug addiction, actual diagnosed emotional and mental issues), but the majority of women won't just set off a "crazy" flag the moment you meet them.
Take mattress girl. There was nothing "crazy" about her during her close friendship with her accused rapist. She was level-headed and by all accounts seemed to be a well-rounded, friendly, open-minded, amicable, reasonable person. Then the alleged rape happened (allegedly) and the smart-asses came out in droves to claim what a crazy bitch she was and how you should never stick your dick in crazy. How would that advice have helped Nangussen? By all accounts it was how she acted AFTER the alleged rape that led people to the conclusion she was crazy. (Also note that there is no proof she lied about the rape, making all assumptions that she made false rape accusations a rush to condemn that hypocritically goes against the whole supposedly dearly-held concept of "innocent until proven guilty", but I digress)
How about Cosby's girls? Were they all "crazy"? Was he actively seeking out exclusively crazy women to stick his dick in? None of the stories about their experiences with him described anything that could be construed as "crazy" behavior on their part, so what good would that advice have done Cosby? (Again, not that we have any proof any of those girls are lying with their accusations.)
You might as well say "Don't stick your dick in someone who's going to accuse you of rape", for all the good it does.
Even if she DID consent, she can change her mind when you flip her over. She can change her mind on her lonely, bow-legged walk home. She can change her mind when you don't respond to her 276th text. She can even change her mind 30 years later once you're a retired TV megastar.
Just learn to identify crazy and don't put your dick in it."
If she changes her mind when you flip her over, you stop. Are you kidding me with this shit?
Yes, she can change her mind at any point after the fact and falsely accuse you of rape. Luckily, the chances of that happening are exceptionally minuscule, since it basically almost never happens. It's certainly not a problem deserving of the heaps and heaps of attention hand-wringing busybodies everywhere are giving it.
I don't think I've ever heard stupider advice than "don't stick your dick in crazy".
On the surface, it seems entirely logical. Fuck a crazy bitch, get problems. In reality, however, it's not something that can be put into action with any kind of consistency or reliability.
The biggest problem is: How do you define "crazy"? I mean, I'm sure you can think of some extreme examples (violent mood swings, heavy drug addiction, actual diagnosed emotional and mental issues), but the majority of women won't just set off a "crazy" flag the moment you meet them.
Take mattress girl. There was nothing "crazy" about her during her close friendship with her accused rapist. She was level-headed and by all accounts seemed to be a well-rounded, friendly, open-minded, amicable, reasonable person. Then the alleged rape happened (allegedly) and the smart-asses came out in droves to claim what a crazy bitch she was and how you should never stick your dick in crazy. How would that advice have helped Nangussen? By all accounts it was how she acted AFTER the alleged rape that led people to the conclusion she was crazy. (Also note that there is no proof she lied about the rape, making all assumptions that she made false rape accusations a rush to condemn that hypocritically goes against the whole supposedly dearly-held concept of "innocent until proven guilty", but I digress)
How about Cosby's girls? Were they all "crazy"? Was he actively seeking out exclusively crazy women to stick his dick in? None of the stories about their experiences with him described anything that could be construed as "crazy" behavior on their part, so what good would that advice have done Cosby? (Again, not that we have any proof any of those girls are lying with their accusations.)
You might as well say "Don't stick your dick in someone who's going to accuse you of rape", for all the good it does.
Tanoomba
ジョーディーすれいやー
- 10,170
- 1,439
A Youtuber is publishing a series of videos exploring why people are so angry at Anita Sarkeesian, and so far it's pretty good.
Why Are You So Angry? Part 1: A Short History of Anita Sarkeesian:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6y8XgGhXkTQ
Why Are You So Angry? Part 2: Angry Jack
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ExEHuNrC8yU
(The rest will be released day by day until Saturday.)
He already did a great piece about Phil Fish that went beyond him as a person and looked at what he represented within the context of gamer culture and internet celebrity. Very well spoken and well thought-out.
This Is Phil Fish
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PmTUW-owa2w
It's nice to see someone take an interesting subject and look at it critically, taking into account many relevant factors... And without condescending snark, no less! Looking forward to the rest of the series.
Why Are You So Angry? Part 1: A Short History of Anita Sarkeesian:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6y8XgGhXkTQ
Why Are You So Angry? Part 2: Angry Jack
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ExEHuNrC8yU
(The rest will be released day by day until Saturday.)
He already did a great piece about Phil Fish that went beyond him as a person and looked at what he represented within the context of gamer culture and internet celebrity. Very well spoken and well thought-out.
This Is Phil Fish
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PmTUW-owa2w
It's nice to see someone take an interesting subject and look at it critically, taking into account many relevant factors... And without condescending snark, no less! Looking forward to the rest of the series.
- Status