The Tanoubliette: Pussy Hurt and Delusions or TTPHAD for short.

Status
Not open for further replies.

khalid

Unelected Mod
14,071
6,775
My favorite Tanoomba conversations (at least as far as showing how off the rails he has become) were the Erronius and Chaos attempts to reach out to him. They both really tried to find common ground with him, to see where he was coming from, and dude just kept getting more and more deranged.
 

Picasso3

Silver Baronet of the Realm
11,333
5,323
Everyone has to hang their hat on something, when you're low on options there's always being different.
 

Erronius

<WoW Guild Officer>
<Gold Donor>
17,331
44,990
My favorite Tanoomba conversations (at least as far as showing how off the rails he has become) were the Erronius and Chaos attempts to reach out to him. They both really tried to find common ground with him, to see where he was coming from, and dude just kept getting more and more deranged.
Was that the"Video about Hitman that wasn't really about Hitman even though it showed AnitaCo specifically playing out a scripted sequence of events (in Hitman) while Anita's voice-over played over it, talking about how Developers meant for you to stuff dead strippers into boxes (in Hitman) since they gave you the freedom to do so in the first place (in Hitman)?"

Dude has taken being 'open minded' to such an extreme that it's a pathological fault of his. He can't even fucking seem to help himself.
 

hodj

Vox Populi Jihadi
<Silver Donator>
31,673
18,384
Its good to have an open mind, but not so open your brain falls out.

Pretty sure Carl Sagan coined that phrase.
 

Tanoomba

ジョーディーすれいやー
<Banned>
10,170
1,439
Hey Jhodi, I demonstrated you lied about me repeatedly in this and other threads when you claimed I claimed Sulkowicz was raped.

Would you care to please link one of these supposed posts where I made said claim?

You can't and won't because you're a lying piece of shit. Just fyi.
 

Tanoomba

ジョーディーすれいやー
<Banned>
10,170
1,439
There's that Creationist logic again

"If you don't have 100% certainty, then anything is possible, including an invisible intangible magical universe generating wizard living in the sky!"

"If you don't have 100% certainty, then anything is possible, including a rape that has not a shred of evidence to support it, and mountains of evidence demonstrating the "victim" is actually a liar."

You are now aware that this type of absolutist logic only works on small minded retards, like yourself.

The rest of us can handle ambiguity, and can look at the sum total of the evidence, and reach a valid conclusion based on the preponderonce of that evidence, which in this case strongly indicates she is a liar, her word cannot be trusted, and that she was never raped.

If you have evidence to prove she was raped, then put up or shut up.

That's what I've been demanding this entire time, that you've been desperately trying to weasel out of.

It isn't working. Everyone here that has commented has pointed out clearly that you're trying to have your cake and eat it too, you disingenuous fuck stain of a human being.

Now. For the 100th time.

Do you have evidence she was raped, yes or no?

If you do not, then the default position is that the positive claim is false. She was not raped. It is just that simple.
I know you're in love with this "creationist" narrative, but that's exactly your problem. You commit yourself so wholeheartedly to false narratives that you go out of your way to put square pegs into round holes to make them work.

I never said "If you don't have 100% certainty, then anything is possible", nor did I imply it. I said we don't know whether Sulkowicz was raped, and we don't. There is no conclusive proof either way, and there likely never will be. That doesn't mean "anything is possible". Either she was raped or she wasn't. Neither has been proven and it's foolish to claim that you have enough information to "know" one way or the other. Your "creationism" narrative doesn't fit this situation at all, not that you're honest enough to ever realize that.
 

Tanoomba

ジョーディーすれいやー
<Banned>
10,170
1,439
It's hilariously sad to see Tanoomba tie himself into knots on this.
All I'm doing is untying the knots others are ascribing to me. I've been open and honest and, above all, CONSISTENT with everything I've been saying. My stance has not changed, and my words very much reflect that. It's just the lies spread about me that I'm addressing, thank you.
 

Tanoomba

ジョーディーすれいやー
<Banned>
10,170
1,439
Tan when you say 'decent chance' that she is telling the truth, can you quantify that? How would you represent that numerically?
You can't represent that numerically. It's an entirely feels-based stance, which is why I repeatedly stated how worthless our personal opinions are. I see plenty of circumstantial evidence that suggests she's telling the truth. Others believe they see circumstantial evidence that suggests she's lying. ALL of that is "feels", and none of that matters. The only thing that matters is what can be OBJECTIVELY PROVEN.
 

Tanoomba

ジョーディーすれいやー
<Banned>
10,170
1,439
talking about how Developers meant for you to stuff dead strippers into boxes (in Hitman)
Nope, she didn't say that. You are mistaken. She didn't say a single word that specifically applied to Hitman and not also to every other game in her list of 25+ games featuring the trope she was discussing.
 

Tanoomba

ジョーディーすれいやー
<Banned>
10,170
1,439
As expected. Can't even answer a simple question. Refuses to take a stance because he's said such stupid horseshit that committing either way reveals him to be the retard he is.
You presented a binary question to force me into a stance I intentionally am not taking. If my official answer is "I don't know" (and it is), then forcing me to say "yes" or "no" is dishonest and I'm not going to play that game.
 

hodj

Vox Populi Jihadi
<Silver Donator>
31,673
18,384
Didn't read a word of any of that crap he wrote.

Did he ever come up with his evidence that Emma was raped, yes or no?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.