The Tanoubliette: Pussy Hurt and Delusions or TTPHAD for short.

Status
Not open for further replies.
Mario Speedwagon

Mario Speedwagon

Gold Recognition
<Prior Amod>
19,525
72,216
Tanoomba_sl said:
You presented a binary question to force me into a stance I intentionally am not taking. If my official answer is "I don't know" (and it is), then forcing me to say "yes" or "no" is dishonest and I'm not going to play that game.
Click to expand...
I don't know if God exists. If someone asks me if I believe he exists I'll say no, because I'm not a flim flam douche artist and realize they are asking me a question of my opinion, not a question of fact. This is how normal humans operate. Refusal to evaluate information and take a stance is not a virtue.
 
Tanoomba

Tanoomba

ジョーディーすれいやー
<Banned>
10,170
1,439
Dr. Mario Speedwagon_sl said:
I don't know if God exists. If someone asks me if I believe he exists I'll say no, because I'm not a flim flam douche artist and realize they are asking me a question of my opinion, not a question of fact. This is how normal humans operate. Refusal to evaluate information and take a stance is not a virtue.
Click to expand...
Aha. So you acknowledge that expressing an opinion is different from stating a fact.

Are you making a claim that God doesn't exist? If you are, can you prove this claim?
 
Tanoomba

Tanoomba

ジョーディーすれいやー
<Banned>
10,170
1,439
hodj_sl said:
Didn't read a word of any of that crap he wrote.

Did he ever come up with his evidence that Emma was raped, yes or no?
Click to expand...
Most dishonest poster on Rerolled, everyone.

Goes into full meltdown mode if anybody says something about him he believes is false. Writes 500-word essays demanding they prove their claims about him.

Gleefully makes false claims about others without providing even a speck of evidence to support them. Refuses to even acknowledge requests to do so, as well as proof that his claims are mistaken.

What a piece of shit. I feel absolutely terrible for your children. I can't imagine what kind of lying scumbags they will grow up to be.
 
AngryGerbil

AngryGerbil

Poet Warrior
<Donor>
17,781
25,897
Tanoomba_sl said:
You can't represent that numerically. It's an entirely feels-based stance, which is why I repeatedly stated how worthless our personal opinions are. I see plenty of circumstantial evidence that suggests she's telling the truth. Others believe they see circumstantial evidence that suggests she's lying. ALL of that is "feels", and none of that matters. The only thing that matters is what can be OBJECTIVELY PROVEN.
Click to expand...
Nothing not based in numbers can ever be objectively proven. We seek reasonable doubt, not objective proof. What rock did you just crawl out from?
 
Tanoomba

Tanoomba

ジョーディーすれいやー
<Banned>
10,170
1,439
AngryGerbil_sl said:
Nothing not based in numbers can ever be objectively proven. We seek reasonable doubt, not objective proof. What rock did you just crawl out from?
Click to expand...
Yeah, and there's plenty of reasonable doubt on both sides. The only difference is how people choose to interpret the available information. I'm the only one here not claiming that I know what actually happened.
 
AngryGerbil

AngryGerbil

Poet Warrior
<Donor>
17,781
25,897
Dr. Mario Speedwagon_sl said:
I don't know if God exists. If someone asks me if I believe he exists I'll say no, because I'm not a flim flam douche artist and realize they are asking me a question of my opinion, not a question of fact. This is how normal humans operate. Refusal to evaluate information and take a stance is not a virtue.
Click to expand...
You need OBJECTIVE PROOF that God does not exist, Good Doctor.

Duh.
 
hodj

hodj

Vox Populi Jihadi
<Silver Donator>
31,673
18,384
AngryGerbil_sl said:
Nothing not based in numbers can ever be objectively proven. We seek reasonable doubt, not objective proof. What rock did you just crawl out from?
Click to expand...
Exactly, and this is what Tanoomba keeps failing to grasp, which is that we have deconstructed his horseshit completely at this point, in the same way that Sye Ten clones can't figure out that Presuppositionalism is dead, it has been utterly refuted. There is no there there.

The crux ofevery single argument Tanoomba has ever made in this communityhas been predicated on this false foundation that proof must be absolute to warrant a conclusion being made.

This is absolutely Creationist logic. Period. Through and through.

You can declare victory over and over till you're blue in the face, you Moon landing denying fucking twat, but this reality is here, in the zeitgeist of the community at this point: Your arguments are foundationally flawed in the same way that religious arguments are. You are the dogmatic ideologue here. No one else.
 
hodj

hodj

Vox Populi Jihadi
<Silver Donator>
31,673
18,384
Which is why his constant foot stomping, demanding he be taken seriously, demanding that his opinion be given equal time, its all just the intellectual equivalent of Ken Ham screaming that evil secularists won't teach "the controversy", for all intents and purposes.

Pure dishonesty at its core. Fundamentally the only analog possible is a religious one, which is why the SJW stuff is a religion. Tanoomba is a product of that mindset. It is dogmatism on display at its core, a complete and utter inability to self reflect and comprehend how built in the incredible flaws in his argument are, and how fundamental they are to his perpetuation of his worldview, and therefore just how far he is willing to go to ensure that reality is mashed into the box of his presuppositions as completely as he can possibly make it.
 
Tanoomba

Tanoomba

ジョーディーすれいやー
<Banned>
10,170
1,439
AngryGerbil_sl said:
What is the reasonable doubt that the 'Emma is a Victim' narrative present?
Click to expand...
- No history of lying about rape.
- Perfectly reasonable explanation for the Facebook exchanges that took place after the alleged rape.
- Her behavior after the fact was not unusual or unheard of among rape victims.
- Nungesser's behavior after the fact also fit her description of what happened.
- No indication she was pressuring him into a relationship or otherwise felt shunned by him.
- No indication of any reason at all why she would lie about being raped.
- Her video project, if an accurate representation of what happened, illustrates a rape that's more "consensual sex escalates to weird levels quickly" than "creepy pervert selects victim to have non-consensual sex with".
- I've known art students. I was an art student. I understand how people can attempt to make a statement through their art about something incredibly personal to them.

Everything that people present as "proof" that she lied is, at best, circumstantial and in all cases has an alternate reasonable and feasible explanation that doesn't involve her lying. Now, I'm not trying to convince anybody to see things how I do, I know that's a fool's errand. But it isnowhere nearas clear-cut and obvious a case as many here attempt to portray it as. It all comes down to how we interpret the information, which is subjective and shaped by personal experiences, worldviews and biases. Therefore, arguing what we personally believe is more likely in this case is pretty pointless and irrelevant.

All to say I never claimed she was raped.
 
Tanoomba

Tanoomba

ジョーディーすれいやー
<Banned>
10,170
1,439
Makes a blatantly false accusation.

Is asked to defend it with evidence.

Can't.

Starts slandering and trying to distract from the issue at hand.

Pretty pathetic.

Put up or shut up, coward.
 
Chanur

Chanur

Shit Posting Professional
<Aristocrat╭ರ_•́>
30,406
50,802
Tanoomba_sl said:
You presented a binary question to force me into a stance I intentionally am not taking. If my official answer is "I don't know" (and it is), then forcing me to say "yes" or "no" is dishonest and I'm not going to play that game.
Click to expand...
In other words you're a cunt that won't take a "stance" but are going to continue arguing against one taken by most of the board. Guess what fuck wit that is a stance.
 
hodj

hodj

Vox Populi Jihadi
<Silver Donator>
31,673
18,384
He keeps making long winded replies no one is reading because he thinks he can somehow punch his way out of this, but he can't.

You can't fix a fundamentally broken theology like you have, founded on bad reasoning and an inability, despite being an english teacher, to tell the difference between the colloquial definition of the word prove versus the academic, mathematical and scientific definition of the term, by punching back.

The flaw in all your arguments has been exposed. It is irrefutable. There is no argument to be had here.

A lack of absolute proof does not prevent a reasonable conclusion being drawn from the preponderance of the evidence. Period. This is fundamental and inarguable. If you don't like it, build a time machine and go take it up with Aristotle, you fucking moron.
 
Tanoomba

Tanoomba

ジョーディーすれいやー
<Banned>
10,170
1,439
Chanur_sl said:
In other words you're a cunt that won't take a "stance" but are going to continue arguing against one taken by most of the board. Guess what fuck wit that is a stance.
Click to expand...
My "stance" is WE DON'T KNOW WHAT HAPPENED. That's the WHOLE FUCKING POINT.

Anything but the point. Literally anything,anythingbut the point.
 
Tanoomba

Tanoomba

ジョーディーすれいやー
<Banned>
10,170
1,439
hodj_sl said:
He keeps making long winded replies no one is reading because he thinks he can somehow punch his way out of this, but he can't.

You can't fix a fundamentally broken theology like you have, founded on bad reasoning and an inability, despite being an english teacher, to tell the difference between the colloquial definition of the word prove versus the academic, mathematical and scientific definition of the term, by punching back.

The flaw in all your arguments has been exposed. It is irrefutable. There is no argument to be had here.

A lack of absolute proof does not prevent a reasonable conclusion being drawn from the preponderance of the evidence. Period. This is fundamental and inarguable. If you don't like it, build a time machine and go take it up with Aristotle, you fucking moron.
Click to expand...
Quote me claiming Emma was raped.

Put up or shut up, coward.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.