The Tanoubliette: Pussy Hurt and Delusions or TTPHAD for short.

Status
Not open for further replies.

Cad

scientia potentia est
<Bronze Donator>
27,082
56,674
rrr_img_135126.jpg
 

Tanoomba

ジョーディーすれいやー
<Banned>
10,170
1,439
I'm not reading anything you're typing.
Therein lies your problem. You think you've got all the answers, but you've got shit. You stubbornly refuse to even acknowledge information that doesn't suit your narrative. You can't possibly win with that mindset. Ever.




There is no way to fix this argument.
Nothing to fix. You made up a bunch of bullshit, tuned everything else out, and are claiming victory. As usual.



Everyone here sees it. Everyone here acknowledges it but you.
Ah, the good old "everyone sees it" schtick. Sorry, Jhodi, you speak for yourself. Others have come and put their two cents in. They speak for themselves. You don't, nor have you ever, nor will you ever, speak for everyone. Sorry if that comes as a shock to you.




This is an intervention, Tanoomba. You are at Ray Cumfart "The banana is the atheist's nightmare" levels of delusional and willfully ignorant right now. Everyone sees it. You see it.

The time has come to abandon this farce.
Indeed, there is a great farce occurring, but you are gravely mistaken on who the one being dishonest is.
 

hodj

Vox Populi Jihadi
<Silver Donator>
31,673
18,384
Basically, Tanoomba's entire argument has been deconstructed to its core flaws, and these have been demonstrated to be intractable.

He is now doing his best to spam type his way out of it, and no one is reading any of it and he can't figure out why.
 

hodj

Vox Populi Jihadi
<Silver Donator>
31,673
18,384
I see "strawman"! is the consonant you're attempting to insert in order to assuage the cognitive dissonance you are feeling right now.

This is to be expected. I believe it has been shown repeatedly that you run to "I'm being strawmanned!" as your last resort in an attempt to make yourself feel better after having been so utterly exposed as the fraud you are.
 

hodj

Vox Populi Jihadi
<Silver Donator>
31,673
18,384
Basically, this is just classic Tanoomba defense tactic "I didn't really say the Moon Landing was a hoax, I just said I believed it was a hoax!"

No one's buying the shit sandwiches you're selling.
 

Tanoomba

ジョーディーすれいやー
<Banned>
10,170
1,439
I see "strawman"! is the consonant you're attempting to insert in order to assuage the cognitive dissonance you are feeling right now.

This is to be expected. I believe it has been shown repeatedly that you run to "I'm being strawmanned!" as your last resort in an attempt to make yourself feel better after having been so utterly exposed as the fraud you are.
If you make up my argument, I will call you on it. Why would you expect otherwise?
 

Chanur

Shit Posting Professional
<Aristocrat╭ರ_•́>
30,402
50,780
Unlike, Jhodi, I've responded to every single challenge leveled at me, patiently and honestly. It's all there. As usual, you're just ignoring reality to push your narrative.
Unsubstantiated drivel is not facts or proof. Just hitting reply doesn't mean a damn thing.
 

Chanur

Shit Posting Professional
<Aristocrat╭ರ_•́>
30,402
50,780
There was facts and proof in the transcripts and actions. You choose to ignore them and give your opinion contrary to those things like it has any weight. In short your 2 bit opinion isn't even worth 2 bits.
 

Tanoomba

ジョーディーすれいやー
<Banned>
10,170
1,439
There was facts and proof in the transcripts and actions. You choose to ignore them and give your opinion contrary to those things like it has any weight. In short your 2 bit opinion isn't even worth 2 bits.
I ignored nothing. Name me one fact I've ignored.

Also, why aren't you calling Jhodi out on the facts he's ignoring? He's open and brazen about it, too. It doesn't get more direct than "Didn't read".
 

Mario Speedwagon

Gold Recognition
<Prior Amod>
19,525
72,216
When a woman is involved, "evidence" for tanoomba just means "can I explain away this contradictory evidence by making assumptions and giving her the benefit of the doubt?" . If the answer is yes, then he actually considers this made up explanation as positive evidence in favor of her story.
 

Cad

scientia potentia est
<Bronze Donator>
27,082
56,674
When a woman is involved, "evidence" for tanoomba just means "can I explain away this contradictory evidence by making assumptions and giving her the benefit of the doubt?" . If the answer is yes, then he actually considers this made up explanation as positive evidence in favor of her story.
635669972190764665594848852_brand new information .gif
 
Status
Not open for further replies.