The Tanoubliette: Pussy Hurt and Delusions or TTPHAD for short.

Status
Not open for further replies.
hodj

hodj

Vox Populi Jihadi
<Silver Donator>
31,673
18,384
So to recap, according to Tanoomba, even though she was, according to her, punched in the face, choked and raped in the ass, we have no evidence Nungesser was trying to seriously injure her and therefore no reason to conclude that there would be any visible injuries after the assault and ass raping she experienced.

You know how I can tell you really are an arts major instead of a physiology/hard sciences major right now?

I didn't watch her re-enactment video because unlike you, I don't masturbate to fake rape porn.
 
hodj

hodj

Vox Populi Jihadi
<Silver Donator>
31,673
18,384
"Well maybe he raped her just a little. Not enough to leave a mark. But still enough to warrant her going to the University, destroying his life, marching around campus for two years with a mattress, speaking to congresswomen, making numerous appearances at various events for rape survivors, carry her mattress to her graduation and make a re-enactment video of the "just a little rape" that happened"

Tanoomba logic.
 
Tanoomba

Tanoomba

ジョーディーすれいやー
<Banned>
10,170
1,439
hodj_sl said:
So to recap, according to Tanoomba, even though she was, according to her, punched in the face, choked and raped in the ass, we have no evidence Nungesser was trying to seriously injure her and therefore no reason to conclude that there would be any visible injuries after the assault and ass raping she experienced.

You know how I can tell you really are an arts major instead of a physiology/hard sciences major right now?

I didn't watch her re-enactment video because unlike you, I don't masturbate to fake rape porn.
Click to expand...
Not according to me, Jhodi. According to Sulkowicz. And she backed it up, by re-enacting it exactly as she described it. So the "Why were there no bruises?" argument has been addressed and debunked. Because you can be hit and choked and have no bruises.

There have never been any contradictions in her story. There has never been even a speck of hard evidence that shows she was lying. Your confirmation bias is no substitute for actual proof, despite your wishful thinking and spectacular ability to detach yourself from reality.

But by all means, keep ignoring any and all information that doesn't suit your narrative. It's what you're good at.
 
hodj

hodj

Vox Populi Jihadi
<Silver Donator>
31,673
18,384
Re-enactment "Exactly as she described it" proves what exactly?

Nothing, you retard.

There have never been any contradictions in her story.
Click to expand...
"He punched me and choked me and raped me in the ass but I have no evidence to support any of those claims. But there are no contradictions in my story whatsoever. That's why the University didn't reject my claims and the police are pursuing rape charges against Nungesser as we speak. Oh wait. Not at all"

Tanoomba logic.
 
hodj

hodj

Vox Populi Jihadi
<Silver Donator>
31,673
18,384
Re-enactment "Exactly as she described it" proves what exactly?

Nothing, you retard.

There have never been any contradictions in her story.
Click to expand...
"He punched me and choked me and raped me in the ass but I have no evidence to support any of those claims. But there are no contradictions in my story whatsoever. That's why the University didn't reject my claims and the police are pursuing rape charges against Nungesser as we speak. Oh wait. Not at all"

Tanoomba logic.
 
Tanoomba

Tanoomba

ジョーディーすれいやー
<Banned>
10,170
1,439
hodj_sl said:
"Well maybe he raped her just a little. Not enough to leave a mark. But still enough to warrant her going to the University, destroying his life, marching around campus for two years with a mattress, speaking to congresswomen, making numerous appearances at various events for rape survivors, carry her mattress to her graduation and make a re-enactment video of the "just a little rape" that happened"

Tanoomba logic.
Click to expand...
If you had watched the video, you would realize how stupid this sounds. What we see in that video is not a grey area. It's a rape, through and through. It unfolds exactly as Sulkowicz described the incident with Nungesser, and it demonstrates how bruising wouldn't necessarily be an issue. Does this act as proof that Sulkoiwcz was telling the truth? No, of course not, but it absolutely acts as proof that if things DID happen exactly as she described them, that there wouldn't necessarily be any bruising.
 
hodj

hodj

Vox Populi Jihadi
<Silver Donator>
31,673
18,384
And this argument from internal consistency that you are making is straight up pulled from Creationist circles.

Isn't the Bible Full of Contradictions? | Answers in Genesis

If you had watched the video
Click to expand...
I don't watch fake rape enactment pornography, sorry cuck.

What we see in that video is not a grey area. It's a rape, through and through.
Click to expand...
"Maybe he raped her just a little. Not enough to cause any bruises, but enough that it was totally rape again when she willingly re-enacted it according to her testimony, which has already been refuted by the evidence and the testimony given at multiple University trials"

Tanoomba logic.
 
hodj

hodj

Vox Populi Jihadi
<Silver Donator>
31,673
18,384
but it absolutely acts as proof that if things DID happen exactly as she described them, that there wouldn't necessarily be any bruising.
Click to expand...
Complains we have a misunderstanding of what proof is, thinks a "re-enactment video" could serve as proof for anything.

Tanoomba logic.
 
Tanoomba

Tanoomba

ジョーディーすれいやー
<Banned>
10,170
1,439
Wow. You went from zero to full retard in just a couple of hours.

If you want to tone down the hyperbole and actually discuss this like a human being, you're always welcome. Until then, you can keep entertaining yourself by sticking your fingers in your ears singing "lalalalalalala".
 
Tanoomba

Tanoomba

ジョーディーすれいやー
<Banned>
10,170
1,439
You know how you can tell when Jhodi has no argument? When he focuses entirely (and I do mean ENTIRELY) on non sequitur, usually involving videos that couldn't have less to do with the topic at hand.
 
hodj

hodj

Vox Populi Jihadi
<Silver Donator>
31,673
18,384
Sounds like some grade A butthurt to me.

Where's the evidence she had bruises or marks from being struck and choked, Tanoomba?

Where's any evidence whatsoever she was raped at all?

"Re-enactment videos" aren't evidence of anything. The Passion of the Christ is a "re-enactment video" that, if everything happened exactly as it portrays, would mean Jesus is the real savior of humankind.

This is how fucking retarded your argument is.
 
hodj

hodj

Vox Populi Jihadi
<Silver Donator>
31,673
18,384
Tell you what, retard, next time you're letting Marmac fuck your wife while you watch and flagellate yourself to orgasm, have him turn around and punch you in the face, hold you down and fuck you in the ass, and then report back to us how its unreasonable to expect any injuries from that interaction.
 
Tanoomba

Tanoomba

ジョーディーすれいやー
<Banned>
10,170
1,439
hodj_sl said:
Where's the evidence she had bruises or marks from being struck and choked, Tanoomba?
Click to expand...
There is none.




hodj_sl said:
Where's any evidence whatsoever she was raped at all?
Click to expand...
Well, there's the accusations from third parties describing events that portray Nungesser as violent and predatory. There's the fact that all the Facebook messages fit perfectly with Sulkowicz's side of the story. There's the fact that there's zero evidence she was trying to pressure Nungesser into a relationship, nor is there any evidence she was shunned by him at all (a popular theory when people try to rationalize the "She's lying" narrative). There's the fact that both parties made a conscious effort to avoid meeting up after the alleged incident, despite their very close relationship up to that point. There's the fact that Sulkowicz has no history of lying about rape. And, of course, there's the fact that she took this emotionally charged, highly personal experience and channeled it into multiple art projects as her way of dealing with it.

All of that is evidence she was raped.

Wait, did you mean proof?

There is none.




hodj_sl said:
"Re-enactment videos" aren't evidence of anything.
Click to expand...
Well, it's evidence that things could have happened EXACTLY as she described them, and still not have created bruises, blowing your theory out of the water. Again: You said if things happened as she described, there would have been visible bruises. Your fallacy is appeal to possibility (again).
 
Soygen

Soygen

The Dirty Dozen For the Price of One
<Nazi Janitors>
28,585
45,256
giphy.gif
 
hodj

hodj

Vox Populi Jihadi
<Silver Donator>
31,673
18,384
Well, there's the accusations from third parties describing events that portray Nungesser as violent and predatory.
Click to expand...
Accusations that were rejected by the University trials.

Anyone can accuse anyone of anything, Tanoomba. Watch: You molest the children you teach at school.

See how easy that was?

Fuck off.

Looks like the rest of your wall of text is just basically you making a lot of blind assertions all the evidence contradicts. Your inability to grasp facts isn't an argument or a rebuttal.

Your logical fallacy is burden shifting. Emma's rape is Russell's teapot. Its not our job to disprove it before we can conclude the person asserting such a thing exists is a liar. It is the person who made the claim's job to prove their assertion true, and in the face of their failure to do so, followed by their egregious overacting and attention whoring in the media and elsewhere, our conclusion said person is a liar is sound.

Deal with it.

All of that is evidence she was raped.
Click to expand...
Evidence she was raped would be a timely report to the authorities followed by a rape test kit and visual recording of the wounds she suffered during the sexual assault.

Nothing else would be evidence of a rape.
 
hodj

hodj

Vox Populi Jihadi
<Silver Donator>
31,673
18,384
And, of course, there's the fact that she took this emotionally charged, highly personal experience and channeled it into multiple art projects as her way of dealing with it.
Click to expand...
Attention whoring is evidence of being raped

Tanoomba logic.
 
hodj

hodj

Vox Populi Jihadi
<Silver Donator>
31,673
18,384
Put my claim in a syllogistic form of the fallacy you claim I'm making so I can mock and ridicule you when you fail to do so properly.

I do not have a claim "It is possible she was/was not raped, therefore she was/was not raped."

I don't have a claim. I have a conclusion. That conclusion is based on the complete lack of evidence provided to support a positive claim.

That is not an appeal to possibility. You fucking retard. The entire field of philsophy is not incorrect so that Tanoomba can be correct.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.