joz123
Potato del Grande
- 6,664
- 9,466
Dine on excrement and perish.yada yada
- 1
- 1
Dine on excrement and perish.yada yada
fanaskin said:That must have made you cream in your pants
fanaskin said:You enjoy walking simulators it's ok
fanaskin said:Neither did the article but that's ok too.
AngryGerbil said:Tan and the Cult: "Hitman encourages you to commit necrophilia."
Gamers: "Um, no it doesn't."
Tan and the Cult: "Why do you keep reigniting this controvery???"
Haast said:
Djevel Innenfor said:Suicide?
radditsu said:Suicide?
Nirgon said:Nope its just OK
Bandwagon links an insightful and well-written article that draws attention to the victim mentality of people who complain about games they don't like getting good reviews. It's relevant and a perfect discussion starter for the Gamergate thread. However, because the article isn't an attack piece against an infamous villain figure, the only acknowledgment it gets is outright dismissal by Lightning Lord Rule. No counter-points given, no explanation as to what the article gets wrong, just a "nuh-uh".
Which is fine. Nobody's required to discuss or even acknowledge something that doesn't necessarily interest them. But as I read the article, I noticed that it addressed many of the themes and arguments that have made many appearances in the GG thread. The weak sauce "X isn't really a video game" arguments, the "they only like it 'cause QUEERS" arguments, the "gamers are under attack" arguments, the "critics are tricking people into buying bad games" arguments... Basically, a lot of the hollow rhetoric that's extremely popular on this board was countered using logic and reason.
So I quoted Bandwagon and recommended the article. Did it lead to a civil discussion about gamer culture and the role games journalism plays in it? Nope. Did it lead to well thought-out rebuttals to the article, pointing out things the author got wrong? Nope. Did it lead to me just being ignored because nobody cared about the article and there was no interest in discussing it? Nope. Instead we got:
3 content-free shitposts from Fanaskin, adding nothing to the discussion:
A ridiculous and inane straw man that doesn't connect to anything and adds nothing to the conversation from Gerb:
A content-free shitpost from Haast, adding nothing to the discussion:
A content-free shitpost from Djevel, adding nothing to the discussion:
A content-free shitpost from Radditsu, adding nothing to the discussion:
And what appears to be a content-free shitpost from Nirgon (I'm not even really sure what he's talking about):
What the actual fuck? You guys feel so threatened by me that you have to respond to any post I make with a torrent of content-free shitposts that actively prevent any discussion from occurring, while simultaneously having the gall to accuse ME of "hijacking threads" or "making it all about me"? Unbefuckinglievable.
What the actual fuck? You guys feel so threatened by me that you have to respond to any post I make with a torrent of content-free shitposts that actively prevent any discussion from occurring, while simultaneously having the gall to accuse ME of "hijacking threads" or "making it all about me"? Unbefuckinglievable.
People just dislike you because you go out of your way to be an obnoxious cunt.
How is that "being an obnoxious cunt"? No, seriously! I wanted a mature and civil discussion about a topic that interests us all and I made a good-faith honest effort to get one started. That's "being an obnoxious cunt" to you? Not the torrent of content-free shitposts that ruin the thread? Not the "Suicide?" comments or repeated spamming of memes? Not going out of one's way to derail a thread with pointless garbage? That's all fine to you, but I'M "being an obnoxious cunt" for trying to actually discuss something. Absolutely asinine.This is an excellent article and it makes several great points.
A must-read for anyone who bitched about the positive press Gone Home received.
khalid said:That video with Buzz is the greatest. Only thing better would be if he was punching the moon landing denier on this board.
No, I wasn't an obnoxious cunt for 2 fucking years. I was someone with an unpopular point of view who the community decided to use as a punching bag. Find examples of me acting like an obnoxious cunt and it's a near-guarantee that I am defending myself from the obnoxious and cunty behavior of others. I don't start fights, but if people are going to attack me I will defend myself. Sorry if that bothers you.khalid said:Dude, you were an obnoxious cunt for 2 fucking years. Of course people are not going to treat you as a rational individual at this point. When they see you link to something like that, they know how its going to go. You are going to try and drag it back to Anita and the other silliness.
This is a lie. You are a liar.khalid said:Almost universally these people threw up their hands after you just refused to be able to hold an intelligent conversation on the subject without resorting to attacks.
No, you shmuck, I don't have myself to blame for OTHER PEOPLE'S BEHAVIOR. If people CHOOSE to act with the maturity of petulant 6 year-olds, THAT'S ON THEM. And fuck you for trying to defend actual obnoxious cunts by blaming it on me. You should be ashamed of yourself.khalid said:So yeah, now people react badly to you. You only have yourself to blame really. You had a new shot at this forum and you threw it all away. The whole "omg a_skeleton_03 banned me and now is trying to dox me with my tracert" was the perfect icing on the cake of your stupidity.
I'm not a moon landing deniar, you liar.I wasn't being obnoxious or a cunt. I was stating that your doubting of a true American Hero like Buzz Aldrin was egregious enough to deserve a punch in the jaw by said hero. He is over 80, so I'm guessing it wouldn't hurt you too bad.
So as usual you don't understand definitions or terms and just make up your own.
This is a lie. You are a liar.
Bullshit. Those guys parachuted in already firmly clinging to their pre-conceived conclusions. They assumed I didn't know what I was talking about and, instead of actually discussing in good faith, were only interested in trying to convince me I was wrong. They ignored the information that didn't fit their pre-decided narratives and got frustrated when I wouldn't kowtow to them.It is absolutely true that you did everything you could to alienate people. Your conversation with AngryGerbil, Chaos and Erronius stood out because they came to you in the shaw and tried to have a conversation with you. You responded like a petulant child. Tons of other conversations went that way also, just intermixed over 2 years in the GG thread.
You can be mad at me for pointing out the hole you put yourself in, or you can start digging yourself out of that hole.
To do that though, you need to move on past your denials.
Your unhealthy obsession with seeing me punished is disturbing. Have you taken your medication today? You know, you could just stay out of the Rickshaw and you would have zero complaints to make about me.Discouraged list. Put him on the discouraged list.
Do it for justice. His false accusations against this community and its generous and beneficient owner demands retribution.
Bullshit. Those guys parachuted in already firmly clinging to their pre-conceived conclusions. They assumed I didn't know what I was talking about and, instead of actually discussing in good faith, were only interested in trying to convince me I was wrong. They ignored the information that didn't fit their pre-decided narratives and got frustrated when I wouldn't kowtow to them.