What vehicle do you drive?

Kobayashi

Bronze Baronet of the Realm
1,425
4,540
I'd look into a 2nd Gen Nissan Leaf - they've depreciated to all hell, so, you could probably find one for about the same price as that Veloster if you try. A commute like that would be about the perfect use case for the vehicle - you could even charge exclusively at work (except maybe in the winter) if they have a spot. Hyundai Ioniq and Chevy Bolt of that vintage are probably in a similar situation, but I'm not sure about their reliability.
 

Hateyou

Not Great, Not Terrible
<Bronze Donator>
18,825
51,049
I mean the 6k 33 mpg veloster might assuming something doesn't break between 100 and 150k miles and a couple years. Anything newish for over 20k certainly not. Wife would curse us with another juke but I refuse to be seen in one even if it actually does snow well.

Need to see how low to ground VW is, kinda getting tired of sitting down even in spacious jag trying to avoid frame and seat bolster.
I imagine most Velosters are beat to shit and will die around 100k. Every veloster I see is a young dude driving it like he’s in fast and furious. I guess for $6k though, maybe it’s worth a shot.

Also if you’re tired of bending down to sit a veloster is not the path forward.
 

Sludig

Potato del Grande
11,575
12,496
I imagine most Velosters are beat to shit and will die around 100k. Every veloster I see is a young dude driving it like he’s in fast and furious. I guess for $6k though, maybe it’s worth a shot.

Also if you’re tired of bending down to sit a veloster is not the path forward.
Ya many had stupid stickers and dumb stuff, a few unmolested. Ugly ass it is was our Juke actually lasted to like 180k before engine blew and get maniac parents that have it now replaced the engine.
 
Last edited:

Hateyou

Not Great, Not Terrible
<Bronze Donator>
18,825
51,049
Ya baby had doing subjects and stuff, a few unmolested. Ugly ass it is our June actually lasted to line 180k before engine blew and get maniac parents that have it now replaced the engine
I’m sorry but I have no idea what you are trying to say here.
 
  • 1Worf
Reactions: 1 user

Sludig

Potato del Grande
11,575
12,496
I’m sorry but I have no idea what you are trying to say here.
Edited, one handed quick text auto corrected to words not even near the keys I swyped. Hell handed tried to change to have when I dragged around for a much longer word. "Like" I can never drag have to type it out always changed to line or similar.
 

Burns

Naxxramas 1.0 Raider
9,089
17,654
2026-04-12 19.41.00 laweconcenter.org 5a4fcd8bc800.png

 
  • 1Like
Reactions: 1 user

Siliconemelons

Ssraeszha Raider
14,563
23,454
View attachment 624773

But some yahoo will open a car kiosk in the mall with an IPad and be able to sell whatever car directly to the consumer…. Think of the horror!
 
  • 1Solidarity
Reactions: 1 user

Haus

I am Big Balls!
<Gold Donor>
19,548
79,950
But some yahoo will open a car kiosk in the mall with an IPad and be able to sell whatever car directly to the consumer…. Think of the horror!
Of you'll be able to just go, customize your ride on line, do the financing through your bank or the manufacturer, and have it delivered...

We can only hope to survive this long enough for the courts to see the error of these ways my friends.
 
  • 1Solidarity
Reactions: 1 user

Sheriff Cad

scientia potentia est
<Nazi Janitors>
32,874
78,629
Car dealership laws are absolutely naked cronyism and corruption and should be repealed and stricken down. Freedom of association is right in the constitution and these laws violate it.
 
  • 1Solidarity
  • 1Like
Reactions: 1 users

Kirun

Buzzfeed Editor
21,511
18,739
Car dealership laws are absolutely naked cronyism and corruption and should be repealed and stricken down. Freedom of association is right in the constitution and these laws violate it.
Those were originally put in place to prevent manufacturers from undercutting independent dealers and creating monopolistic control over distribution and service. Whether they still serve that purpose effectively today is a different question, but there was at least some rationale behind them.

Where I'd agree with you more strongly is that the current system feels totally outdated and overly rigid. Instead of blanket protections, it probably makes more sense to revisit and modernize the framework. Allow more flexibility for direct sales while still ensuring consumer protections and fair competition. Right now, it feels less like a balanced system and more like one that hasn't kept up with how the industry actually operates in 2026.
 

Sheriff Cad

scientia potentia est
<Nazi Janitors>
32,874
78,629
Those were originally put in place to prevent manufacturers from undercutting independent dealers and creating monopolistic control over distribution and service. Whether they still serve that purpose effectively today is a different question, but there was at least some rationale behind them.
How does the person who makes a product "undercut" someone who has to buy the product from them and then generate a profit?

Why are "independent" dealers (which are really just brokers, or resellers) entitled to "fair" competition with the company that actually makes the fucking products?
Where I'd agree with you more strongly is that the current system feels totally outdated and overly rigid. Instead of blanket protections, it probably makes more sense to revisit and modernize the framework. Allow more flexibility for direct sales while still ensuring consumer protections and fair competition. Right now, it feels less like a balanced system and more like one that hasn't kept up with how the industry actually operates in 2026.
What consumer protections do dealers give? How to dealers ensure fair competition? Dealers are fucking ripping us all off and providing no value.

I completely disagree, car dealerships are some of the worst, scammiest, shittiest businesses alive, and we have ACTUAL LAWS protecting THEM and FORCING you to deal with them.

Fuck that.
 

Kirun

Buzzfeed Editor
21,511
18,739
How does the person who makes a product "undercut" someone who has to buy the product from them and then generate a profit?

Why are "independent" dealers (which are really just brokers, or resellers) entitled to "fair" competition with the company that actually makes the fucking products?

What consumer protections do dealers give? How to dealers ensure fair competition? Dealers are fucking ripping us all off and providing no value.

I completely disagree, car dealerships are some of the worst, scammiest, shittiest businesses alive, and we have ACTUAL LAWS protecting THEM and FORCING you to deal with them.

Fuck that.
A manufacturer controls supply, pricing structures, incentives, and financing relationships. If they sell direct and supply independent dealers, they can absolutely squeeze those dealers via preferential pricing, inventory access, or even just underpricing them outright because they don't need to maintain a separate margin layer. It's exactly the kind of vertical integration issue these laws were originally trying to prevent.

Second, calling dealers "just brokers" ignores some of the actual functions they serve. Are all of those functions efficient or fairly priced? No. But things like localized inventory, trade-ins, immediate delivery, service departments, warranty handling, and financing access don't just disappear if you wipe dealerships out. The question then becomes: who takes that on, and how well? In a direct-sales-only world, you're basically betting that manufacturers will handle all of that better and more importantly, in your favor. That's not guaranteed.

And that leads into the bigger point that removing dealerships doesn't automatically mean a better deal for consumers. It might feel like it should, but if you eliminate the middle layer and the competition between independent sellers, you're often just concentrating more control in the hands of a few large manufacturers - business consolidation is something America needs less of, not more. That can just as easily lead to fixed pricing, less negotiation, and fewer local options. In other words, different problems not necessarily fewer problems.

Where I do agree with you is that the current system often protects bad behavior and limits alternatives. Forcing consumers into one sales model is hard to justify in 2026. But swinging all the way to "burn it down" without thinking through what replaces it could just trade one kind of frustration for another. Dealerships absolutely deserve scrutiny and reform. But the solution probably isn't pretending they serve zero purpose or that manufacturers would magically act more consumer-friendly if given total control.
 
  • 1Like
Reactions: 1 user

Burren

Bronze Baronet of the Realm
5,882
9,582
I love cars but absolutely hate franchises dealers. Want to pay MSRP? Nope, sorry, we’re adding $100k on top because fuck you.
 

Haus

I am Big Balls!
<Gold Donor>
19,548
79,950
Nope, burn it down.
I think at one point in the past there might have been some justification for the distributor/dealer model. I see it in my industry. The traditional cybersecurity model was Vendor produces, Disti distributes (as it's name), and resellers sell. Back when this started it made sense because no vendor had the capacity to do legal agreements with every possible customer (resellers could), and they didn't want to deal with massive shipping and logistics chains (Disti).

Now, most Cybersecurity products are software, so there's no "distribution network" to get these products shipped to customers, that's an email. And purchasing can be done with a few clicks on a website in many cases. (there goes disti) And most companies have existing contracts with one or more of the big cloud vendors which allow them to transact deals with vendors that cloud provider deals with (essentially removing the reseller). And I'm watching in real time as the disti and reseller spaces are being absolutely wrecked and becoming essentially unprofitable. That's the market handling the problem, and how IMHO it should work.

The car dealership nonsense is shameless protectionism and government interference with the free market.

As soon as a good and viable method for selling a car online happened that was, IMHO, the last nail in the coffin for dealers. Now the only dealer in DFW I can think of that seems to really be holding on well is Sewell maybe, and they're going full tilt on "You pay more but you get the Sewell kit glove pampering experience" bougie angle. But honestly their service isn't that great now and the premium paid for that is kinda ridiculous.

On a lighter note :
1776111208775.png
 
  • 3Like
Reactions: 2 users

Xarpolis

Life's a Dream
16,275
18,435
I strongly dislike the names that MFG's are using on their cars right now. I'm currently in a 500 while my Pacifica is getting service. What the fuck is a 500? That doesn't tell you anything.
What does CX-50 tell you different than CX-5? It's all nonsense.