We got a badass over here.our raids of low level alliance zones
There are no hordes of people on my server, sorry. It has become a shell of what it used to be (and I had a worse rig at the time it was packed full). So yeah, it's very likely that you're right, but I can't test it. For all the games I play, the extremely rare occurences of graphics trying to catch up are not in WoW, more in SWtoR, but that's the engine splurting. In D3 for example I haven't any fps drop in 3 ppl games, while Landmark runs on average around 35-45, but since it's early beta maybe it's not optimized yet.I have an i7-4770k OC'd to 4.8 Ghz and a 780 Ti OC'd. You do not get 60 FPS in town unless you live on a low pop server. Raiding? Sure, no problem. But if you go into town and there is anymore that 50+ people I'd love to see you maintaining 60 FPS.
7 of 8 new ones too.I thought they said there was only 5 dungeons back at Blizzcon? Because were were all wtf about the ever shrinking number of dungeons to get tired of within two weeks of release.
I guess 32 days longer than Vanilla -> BC is technically "months" longer but... well whatever.Maybe they'll say adding the new dungeons is what made WoD take months longer to develop than any other expansion?
I hope it's 8 without including heroics ( so 16).So when they say there are 8 level 100 dungeons, do they mean on heroic or normal? As I recall, they wanted to have more options for non-heroic dungeons at 100, which would gear you up for LFR, while heroic dungeons would gear you for normal raiding. 8 non-heroic dungeons at cap would be a precedent not seen since BC. LK had 4, while Cata and Pandaria had only 3. Gearing up in regular before heroic really only happened in BC and Cata, but man did that suck if you didn't have friends or guildies.