Yahoo live epic fun

GuardianX said:

I wasn"t really making the comment against you, merely stating the obvious.

I miss the truely epic threads, like the Sam Deathwalker VS FoH / Furor.

Click to expand...

Not so much me, it"s a community here, that stuff always made me feel like a spectator, I"d rather participate. Guys like Sam and Searyx made it feel like everyone that was too opinionated, or hyper, or combative, or high spirited, or just someone that wasn"t rude or a dick, but honestly loved to debate, all of those different types of people and personalities we"re just written off as trolls and dismissed, got easier than trying to figure people out.

I learned to just quit responding to people at a people level for the most part, and just participate in discussions I like, stupid or serious. But watching Sam try to flaunt his e-peen never interested in me. He came to a site, and fucked with the 1 guy on the site everyone would back up. I hate feeding attention whorse, so I didn"t. And once we saw those pics of his room and him? Too easy after that, it was like clowning on cancer patients. Was funny to watch all these people thinking they were "owning" him and never knowing all the attention they gave, good or bad, he was eating it up.

As for the rules of this thread, only normal, non-creepy guys are going to respect the rules. If you"re 30 and think it"s perfectly ok to ask a 16 year to start tearing it off, you PROBABLY don"t give too many shit about some forum rules.

I usually lurk, but if there is someone on thats interesting i sometimes bullshit with them. I cant stand them folks that do stupid and idiotic things. Thats not even freaking funny. The other day i was chatting with this Lebanese broad and asking her questions about being a Muslim. It was pretty cool. In all honesty i never even had any serious conversation with a middle eastern person in my life. I mean i see the bossman at the liquor store and all, but thats as far as it goes. lol

Oh yeah, that broad or whatever it is Schizzy can be highly entertaining at times.

aychamo_aycono said:

Please do not upload here any pics or anything of me

Click to expand...

After the numerous deals we struck with certain...internet video companies...legally we can"t anyway. No worries.

Hippos said:

Finally the thread returns... on the night they"re performing maintenance , thank you though. A lot of stuff happened since the other thread was locked down, including 4 of the hotter regular girls on the site getting in the nude all in the same room. I"ll work on uploading videos or screen caps later on since I know the thread will actually be returning.

Click to expand...

Which girls? I had kind of given up on Yahoo Live

i liked being able to occasionally catch a full movie someone would be playing in their channel. teeth was a surprise. the site itself has started to move more towards a community and less "omg titties" if you ever frequent it much. its always the same people which is fun but the fohss presence definitely dwindled once the thread disapeared. mostly because aych keeps getting banned for having sex on it and we cant find his new names.

aychamo_aycono said:

Please do not upload here any pics or anything of me

Click to expand...

What"s wrong? Showing your asshole to underaged girls making you nervous?

How did I miss this thread the first time around?

So just for clarification, we can post pic/vid victories in the show your tits department along with "LULZ put keybrd on ur hed" exploits - but dont be dumb and post any of the previous if the said people are underage, underage looking or even unknown- correct?

any the 4 chick epic win nudes is a must...that is...if they are legal

and of course the no random milli bashing for doing her job, but thats a rule in every thread right?

Dont post nudes, at all. The first few nudes will be fine, then boom, cp. Just don"t do it. Keep them as internal links in channels. But random/funny shit should fly ok. Provided we are not e-stalking some 45 year old woman, or underage twat.

Yay for having the thread back!

What was being posted, and why was it removed?

Ham n Cheese said:

What was being posted, and why was it removed?

Click to expand...

Mods i guess have been quite fast- I only saw a few tit shots and none seemed close to underage - closest to "over the line" i guess would be the takeing a shit but no penor, just kinda nastly-amuseing in the mini cam while a cam whore was doing something

Ham n Cheese said:

What was being posted, and why was it removed?

Click to expand...

There were sexually compromising pictures of a girl people knew to be under the age of 18, among other things. Basically, the thread was teetering on the brink of child pornography at all times. The thread itself was not deleted; it is simply being cleaned up to address some legal concerns that were raised about it.

The thread has returned, but on a very strict leash. Please be aware that the following rules still apply:

1)Under no circumstances is child pornography allowed on this board.Child pornography doesnot necessarily have to mean nudity.It includes, but is not limited to, sexually suggestive or compromising pictures of minors. This could include pictures of an underage girl in her underwear, pictures of an underage girl performing sexual gestures or pantomimes when prompted by the users, or pictures of an underage girl being asked or chatted sexual things by the users in the chat room. Essentially, do not contribute to the delinquency of minors.

2)When in doubt about a girl"s age, do not post sexually explicit or compromising material involving her on these boards.If a girl tells you she"s 18 but looks a lot younger, assume she"s younger. If a girl tells you she"s 18 but looks 18 or over, tread carefully. If a girl tells you she"s under 18, take her at her word and DO NOT post her here.

3) Know that, in the eyes of the law, posting sexually compromising, explicit, suggestive, or lewd pictures of a minor is afelony. This is not negotiable with me or with a judge and jury. Just don"t do it here (or anywhere, preferably).

4)Exposing yourself to a minor is a felony.This includes flashing a girl on Yahoo chat that you know or suspect to be underage.

5) Legally speaking,"she told me she was 18!" is not a viable defense if the girl turns out to be under 18.All that matters to a judge is the subject"s actual age, and not what she claimed her age was to you. Knowing this, tread carefully.

This could include pictures of an underage girl in her underwear

Click to expand...

To clarify since this issued came up earlier in the thread... Basically if there is underwear in the picture, don"t post it here. Even if it is underwear she got from the drawer (aka: fully clothed) it won"t be accepted by the mods.

PerritoBites said:

To clarify since this issued came up earlier in the thread... Basically if there is underwear in the picture, don"t post it here. Even if it is underwear she got from the drawer (aka: fully clothed) it won"t be accepted by the mods.

Click to expand...

That"s correct, because an underage girl waving her underwear around -- even if she"s not wearing it -- would constitute a sexually suggestive image meant to appeal to people"s prurient interests. Just don"t do it.

Also, I"d like to reiterate an important point a lot of people seemed to be missing the first time around: it"s not about "obeying the mods" here. It"s about obeying thelaw. It may seem like I"m being harsh here, but I"m actually on your side and busting my ass to keep both you guys and fohguild.org out of legal trouble.

I am all up for obeying the law. But I am pretty sure that underwear does not imply sexual implications. But yeah, I do agree that being a little extra strict is for the benefit of the thread/forums. I would show my side of the argument of why underwear does not imply sex, but I don"t really care to be right... I"m just fine with an underwear-free thread