Search results

Well I can"t say I"m an expert. I put out notoriously difficult to translate signals. But if a girl wants to flirt with me she can just come up and start interacting; it"s not rocket science. Talk to me. But then, I"m one of those weird guys that wants women he can hold intelligent conversations...

It is if you"ve established that it"s not something you wish to be a party to and they continue to do it anyway, given circumstances that are under their control. Saidin: if a girl is flirting with my I typically take that as a sign that she"s into me, not that she"s a whore.

My mother made me late to shit all the time. I guess she never raised me to appreciate that as the magic of women, so I ended up seeing it as a character flaw. In my world, I want someone I can treat as an equal, which is a two way street. Therefore this ideal of showing up and putting my...

What I do. Texas is definitely south but they"re kind of their own thing. And while I agree that they have some of the most unhealthy cities, Austin is a pretty striking exception to the norm in Texas.

- I don"t consider Texas to really be "The South," and besides that Austin is not even a typical Texas town. It"s A) the home of UT and B) really liberal and therefore not so full of fatties (fitness is now a liberal cause) - Virginia is pretty far north for a "The South" state. But maybe it...

Which places in the top 10 are from "The South"?

The women in MN are overweight and it"s fucking cold here.

I thought it was pretty common sense stuff but you know what they say about common sense. Definitely if you think you can ride indefinitely on random hugs, compliments, and acknowledgements of her in various ways you"re not going very far. [Edit] Ravv post, common sense, for clarity.

Inconsiderable"s not wildly off the mark. Here"s another anecdote, I hope it"s instructive: Started dating a girl a good while after just hanging out with her quite a bit. I have body language which is often difficult to read. This particular female was specifically trained to read body...

I find this video to be appropriate from many angles ATT. <object width="480" height="385"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/zWo9kM063zc?fs=1&amp;hl=en_US"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess"...

I don"t agree with it being an intentional test. And taking a long time to get ready is really not something I have a problem with other than when it gets in the way of spontaneity. It"sknowingthat it takes you 45 minutes to get ready and waiting until you"re supposed to be there in 30 to start...

Someone hit the key word: control. Almost every woman, at least the ones you non-submissive types want, wants a man who is at least in control of himself. If you appear to be acting on emotion you"re going to fail "tests" all day. As far as how to deal with specific incidents like a female who...

One of the most impressive things a female I"ve dated has ever done was go from finishing her day (and she was dirty) to ready to go out with fifteen minutes notice. Granted she had this easy hotness that would have been almost obnoxious if she wasn"t so unassuming. Some have an excuse. More...

Big difference between talking about relationship stuff in order to try and get advice (or vent), and just talking about some random sexual shit with no relevance for kicks. I do agree that in all likelihood, if you"re going to do it this is a safe place. But...well we"ve seen this forum...

Anything like that I ever discuss with my friends is encoded in such a way they"ll never know who the fuck I was talking about just in case theydomeet them. I don"t care what "women do," talking about bedroom shit among people who will meet someone who you supposedly care about is a no-no in my...

One of the best marriages I know of is a couple who broke up for years before getting back together. They"ve been almost obnoxiously happily married for several years now.

Zone control is shit if your game isn"t designed for it.

Not going to read the spoiler"d shit, but from what you are saying I"m going to emphasize my recommendation NOT to have a threesome with this girl. Can almost guarantee she"d be doing it for you, not herself, and that"s a bad thing.

BECAUSE OH MY GOD YOU CAN"T NOT CONSIDER IT! Because sex with two women is so high up on important life experiences, how could you reject it outright just because it has "serious risks" to "relationships"? That"s like saying you"d pass up winning a million dollars just because your mother...

Just because there"s a debate doesn"t mean it"s debatable

It"s a wedge. People will figure out the "love and sex" thing eventually, and then there"ll be another revolution where everyone figures out that the last revolution was wrong, and it will just go in a circle forever. I don"t know what kind of lover you are, Eomer, but you don"t give to...

There"s really no arguing the "logic" of cheating. I called you emotionally immature because that"s what it takes to be your age and not realize that you aren"t a special snowflake who can logic cheating into being OK. Idiot.

How does it feel to have some of the biggest dysfunctional dipshits in this thread school you on relationships, Sharmai? Of course, I"m sure you"re still convinced you"re right, but I gotta tell you, you"re not the first person who thought he could pull this off because he had discovered some...

/rage

o/\o Also: this is a bad idea.

I think the haircut is cute, though honestly I haven"t met the girl yet who had a boy haircut and no issues. YMMV.

Following this, I got AIDS of the face and now I look just like kegkilla.

Lol internet stereotypes LAWL ROFLMAO. Idiot.

People are going for their Achievement: Get on Aychamo"s Ignore List and Have Him Post a Screenshot to Prove it Like a Faggot. It"s a truly elite club.

Considering we saw the "equip this to equip that" shit in Diablo I"m pretty sure it"s a feature they could avoid if they wanted to. It"s a really, REALLY stupid fucking feature, and not at all what I was aiming at, by the way.

I think not being able to backstab or gouge with a staff or cast elaborate spells with a breastplate is pretty reasonable. There is areasoncloth classes wear robes instead of, you know, armor, in a world where they are constantly in mortal danger, after all. Not like it"s a concept that hasn"t...

It"s not hard to visualize a skill-based game that limits what abilities you can use based on the armor and weapons you have equipped.

Stop doingwhatto this thread?

I think you can do fantasy without the healing, we just haven"t seen it seriously done yet. Would it shorten fights necessarily? No, stop thinking inside the metaphorical think box that prevents out-of-the-box thinking. Let"s look at the current design: Boss does X damage Healers heal X...

Mel Gibson said that Braveheart was historically accurate.

I agree and disagree. Combat has to take on a different dynamic when there are no healers. You"re always going to have tanking of some kind if there are controllable aggro mechanics and clear winners and losers when it comes to mitigating damage, but without healers you will not have the best...

The key is getting rid of healers.

I just think the Persians clearly descend from culturally sophisticated peoples and reject 300 purely on its merits as a film.

That, and it could have been a lot better-written.

300 wasn"t very good.