Search results

yeah, i think he could smell him as well as hear him. i actually really liked the beginning sequence with bilbo and smaug. they did a great job in capturing the vastness of the lair in the movie (as well as the amount of treasure). where they lost it is when they did the keystone cops thing for...

and that is why i don't go see sequels.

anyone asking to remake a stanley Kubrick movie should be killed. seriously.

i'll donate, depending on the direction of the game. i honestly didn't like anything i saw in regards to EQN, so if this game is based off of that tech, i'm not going to be happy.

aren't they remaking "carrie"? i'm sure with all the remakes hollywood is shitting out, you'll get your wish (well, they'll be remade, not sure if they will be remade well).

great post. i agree with this. the grind wasn't as bad (or didn't seem as bad) in EQ because there was always a chance for a rare named with the rare loot. it was just enough incentive to keep you logged in for hours past when you knew you had to go.

lethal weapon doesn't make the list???

that's an easy one: dune. the book is epically good, the movie is epically bad.

Shawn: Closing Warhammer Online. I mean, the game was kinda fun at first, but can we stop with that exact formula now? Thanks. (I'm already putting my vote in for 2015's Biggest Trend to be "the end of voxel-based online games.") i like this.

ummm, prepare to be disappointed then.

see, i disagree with this. i think the third movie will probably be the worst as far as filler goes, because all that's left is the killing of smaug and the war of the five armies. there really isn't anything else going on. so if the third movie is a 2 hour long war, that shit's going to get...

i think they should have just made this 2 movies. there's just not enough material in "the hobbit" for three, three hour movies. they could have chopped several hours of all this filler crap out of the movies and it would have made them much better. i think the problem is that peter jackson is...

where does "eyes wide shut" fall in people's all time christmas list? the orgy at the mansion has to at least put in on the ranking.

yeah i agree. there is absolutely no sense of danger or any kind of build up of suspense in the hobbit movies. i stated it before, but even though i knew what was going to happen in the LOTR movies, the sense of danger and the suspense seemed real. in these movies, it's just stupid silliness...

i've only ever read the first edition of "the hobbit." when does all this shit supposedly take place? the version of the book i read, there is absolutely no tie in to the LOTR whatsoever. in fact, gollum bets the ring on the game of riddles and loses it fair and square and never even complains...

the original LOTR movies were critically acclaimed, and won several oscars, including best picture for ROTK. the hobbit movies are complete CGI shit. it's exactly the same as the star wars movies. the originals were critically acclaimed, and the prequels are CGI horse shit. so i think it's a...

so then why the fuck put her in the movie? the very first thing you learn when you become a writer is if it's not essential, take it out.

just got back. peter jackson is now officially george lucas 2.0 all the magic he had when he made the original LOTR movies is gone. this is a brain dead cash grab, plain and simple. there is no reason to deviate this far from the book. the book was perfect the way it was written. bard doesn't...

yeah, there's nothing wrong with reusing old parts of the game by adding new mobs, loot, etc... it's all about incentive. hell, i remember when EQ revamped cazic thule. that place was packed day and night.

billion dollar franchise. yeah, except that star wars is awesome and amular is a vague, uninteresting piece of donkey shit. thinking shilling is probably the guy who talked miami into building a brand new 634 million dollar ballpark for all their loyal fans...

the lighting/shading for the division looks a thousand times better than anything i've seen console wise before. i was just watching a demo of dying light and it was an eyesore when compared to what frostbite is able to produce.

VG was supposed to have this. they called it "phasing" i think, where a guild could trigger a spawn or a boss and then they would be locked into that mob without anyone else being able to interfere or intervene. i guess it's similar to an instance, but not quite because you're not instanced into...

i'm not that big into PvP, and i really enjoyed EQ because it was PVE centric. however, i'm not totally against PvP either, as long as it's meaningful and more than just "battlegrounds." EQ had a pretty damn good idea in that they had FFA PvP servers for those who liked that sort of thing, and...

youtube now has all the episodes of "the life and times of tim" available. so, they're all right in my book.

seriously, this game looks good enough to almost make me want to buy a next gen console. thank god the studio came to their senses though and are making it for PC as well.

if you invest another $500, you get a separate marketing speak video from someone who doesn't sound like a retard...

please god no.

it's like you want to be hated....

you being serious? itemization in EQ was very noticeable and vital. you knew immediately if the tank in your group had planer armor cause he took less damage. you knew when the rogue or monk had a COF or FBSS cause he did a shit ton more damage at a faster pace. the only people who really had a...

so then stop derailing the thread!

true, but you're really missing the entire point of what the appeal was of EQ: the loot. the reason why so many people camped for hours/days on end in the dungeons was to get the ultra rare loot, whether to sell it or equip it. it's no different in a video game than it is in real life. extremely...

good point. add what you said into what i said, and it would be even better. also, it is almost 2014, so smarter NPC's would also make for a better dungeon crawl experience.

just give me sprawling, non linear dungeons (i'm talking huge fucking dungeons) with enough content for at least 10 groups to comfortably be in the dungeon at the same time (no instancing) and some rare mobs with ultra rare loot, maybe a raid boss or 2 thrown in there somewhere, and boom, i'm...

is it being released on PC, PS4, and xbox 1 all at the same time? cause if that's the case, then yes, it will definitely sell over 2mil. if it's just PC, i don't think it will hit 2 million in just one week.

no offense, but this story made global news. no knowing about it (especially as a gamer) is about as ignorant as not knowing about bernie madoff...

i don't think blanco and blackwulf are the same person, but they are both clearly retarded.

the cruel reality is that theory crafting about MMO's on forums is a fuck ton more fun than actually playing any of the MMO's that are currently out....

i agree, but it's not like this game is being made by some brand new start up company. i mean, they've probably thrown well over a hundred million dollars at this game, so there is no excuse for the graphics to look like they came from 2005. the fact that it's clunky as fuck doesn't help, either.

i'd put the disappointment for this game on par with star wars: the phantom menace.

when i think of TES, i think do anything, go anywhere. so having hard faction PVP is retarded (3 factions is only slightly less gay than 2), being on rails is retarded, having quest hubs is retarded. basically, everything about this game is retarded. so i guess if you're retarded, you'll like it.