Search results

Exploiting the legal system to circumvent the already tragically weak gun laws we have in place sure is awesome! High five!

DON'T QUESTION ROBB FUCKING WOLF.

Oh no a couple of internet people think I am a retard. Whatever shall I do? Sugar being in a lot of things doesn't automatically equal it being a problem. You're basically being a food hipster, disliking something because it's popular.

20 bucks says Robb Wolf's real name is "Nelson Liebowitz" or something like that.

MOTHER FUCKING ROBB WOLF. I'm convinced, now.

I don't know, God is pretty okay with murder. Haven't you read the Bible?

Awww, am I invading your safe space? Show me on the doll where the bad liberal touched you.

You mean his six children with four different women, none of whom he is married to, right?

Here's a link for you:

I don't think you understand what the word "support" means in this context. Hint: it tends to require a chain of actual facts.

What a convenient way to avoid having to provide any support whatsoever for your opinions.

Man, I don't know what you're talking about. A Freep article that ends up referring back to itself is a way better primary source than a Mother Jones article with about 20 cites back to various academic publications (and yes, a few questionable ones as well).

They also tried to split the check to avoid paying the automatically added gratuity for their party of 20.

I'll bite, though. Who had a come to Jesus moment about guns based on the awesome arguments posted in this thread?

You're deceiving yourself badly if you think this is what happened.

PRI is like a half-step away from the Cato Institute, if that. Absolutely shocking that one of their contributors would write a pro-gun article.

I think it's an accurate representation of the current state of the thread.

Gaahaha. The lead author of that is from PRI. Anyway, to an extent, I get it. Guns have an undeniable cool factor, and if I had a bunch of them, I wouldn't want to give any of them up either.

To an extent, but there are more dissenting voices in that thread than there are in this one. This thread is 99% self-congratulatory nonsense as opposed to 95% in the politics thread.

Trolling aside, I don't think the idea of teachers trying to go commando against a shooter is a good idea. I would prefer the NRA-pushed idea of more armed guards in schools over that. Teachers are there to teach, not to try to be Rambo. Especially considering that it's hard enough to attract...

Yeah, it was pretty dumb how opiate did that, wasn't it?

Is this the part where I don't even read the article and just complain about it being a link from Freep?

I agree that you shouldn't say it's zero. You also shouldn't say it's frequent enough to be a strong pro-gun argument either without any supporting evidence, though, and yet that's done all the time.

It's not a perfect article by any means, but it is absolutely filled with citations and, despite Tuco's laughable assertion, covers most of the things that I hear gun owners/advocates actually say, over and over again. My biggest quibble with it is the claim that no mass shootings have been...

Well, this whole thread is a hilariously one-sided circlejerk anyway, I didn't really expect anyone to pay attention to those pesky facts.

So, no actual counters to what the article says then, just lots of complaints about the source. Got it.

Uh huh.

http://www.motherjones.com/politics/...ths-fact-check

http://www.screamingbee.com/product/MorphVOXJunior.aspx

It just shows how thin the veneer of his "Saint Ray" personality really is. It doesn't take much to peel it back and show the monster underneath.

I wonder what would happen if you walked up behind Ray Lewis and whispered "deer antlers" in his ear. I put the chances that he'd turn around and shank you at about 95%.

Fedor is a treasure and you need to shut the fuck up.

Your posts are the written equivalent of an Ed Hardy shirt.

This subforum is the equivalent of just making threads directly in the rickshaw, for the most part.

I saw that but it looks like he answered like six questions and then left. So I wouldn't bother.

Yeah, you're losing an argument badly to fucking Aychamo. You don't get to pretend you're intellectually superior to anybody else, tough guy.

That's not true! He's not only neutral, but skeptical of it himself! Honest and for true! He most definitely ISN'T shilling the fuck out of it and raging at anyone who dares question a radical diet that has basically no scientific support for it and may in fact be extremely harmful based on...

This subforum should be renamed to "place to post stupid shit with the hope that you'll be shielded from well-deserved trolling".

dupertouch demonstrating he knows as much about nutrition as he knows about baseball.