Search results

There's nothing difficult about them. They're just wrong.As I have proven. But thanks for showcasing once again how comfortable you are being a colossal hypocrite as you sit there with your fingers in your ears going lalalalalala.

No, No. These areYOUR WORDS: I proved you wrong. Do you have a rebuttal or not? All I see is you putting your fingers in your ears going lalalalalala, which, ACCORDING TO YOU, is not a rebuttal.

A few more:

Apparently there was anall-female, all nude production of Shakespeare's The Tempestin Central Park a couple of months ago. The troupe included at least one looker:

Dude, you're not getting it.I proved you wrong.Your straw man holds no power any more. I remind you:

Ah, OK. Sometimes it's hard to tell what the tone of a message is.

I'm not really sure if you're being sarcastic or not. Just to clarify: No, nothing in the court documents show Sulkowicz asking for sex after the alleged rape. This is not debatable.

I gave you the evidence you were asking for, Jhodi. It's righthere.

And unlike Jhodi's version of this claim, this one is actually PROVEN.

OK, since you choose to be a lazy fuck and do nothing but lie through your teeth, I suppose (once again) that I will have to do the legwork. Here'sthe only post where you attempt to quote me making the claim that Nungesser's attorneys manipulated the email and text transcripts. In fact, you...

So, not backing up your claim then? You're back to elementary-level hollow insults? That's our Jhodi.

Take a break whenever you want, dude. You don't need my permission and you are not obligated to respond to my posts one minute after I make them.

The only thing that "already" happened is that I already debunked your straw man, which is why I don't understand why you're still asking me to prove something I've never claimed. Show me making the claim. You have never done that. Not earlier in this thread, not buried under sarcasm and...

I don't need a refresher, I know exactly what I said. YOU need to back up your claim, for once.

Link my claim. Put up or shut up.

Still pretending your straw man isn't a straw man? You know, it would be really easy to prove it's not a straw man: Just link me making the claim. I've linked all of your ridiculous claims. If this claim I supposedly made is so important to your case that it's literally the only thing...

Notice how Jhodi doesn't actually link to me making the claim he says I made? There's a reason for that.

Actual Jhodi claims: -Sulkowicz asked Nungesser for sex after the alleged rape. -Hard evidence exists which proves Sulkowicz was lying. -Evidence = Hard evidence(I wish I was kidding) -Criticizing his exact and explicit claims is a straw man. -Tanoomba can't admit when he's wrong. -Jhodi...

What "state" are you referring to? And why the fuck wouldImake a poll forYOU?You can set up whatever popularity contest you want, dude. Don't let me stop you. If trying to show that you're more popular than I am will make you feel better about the giant straw man you have yet to prove is...

Jhodi's used to having a mod swoop in to rescue him. He's never had to smell his own shit for so long before. You'd better believe I'm taking full advantage of this delightful opportunity to out-logic and out-proof the self-appointed king of proof and logic.

Just to clarfiy, the most recent bout of Jhodi's flagrant and downright flamboyant hypocrisy was his claim that I am unable to admit when I am wrong. I have provided objective hard evidence that proves otherwise, and did Jhodi admit he was wrong? No, sir, he did not. Know what we call that...

I love it. Jhodi's painted himself into a corner. I keep providing proof (actual proof, mind you), of his obsessive dishonesty and hypocrisy, but he's committed to pretending he's not reading anything. He mistakenly believes that simply by pretending he's controlling the "discussion"...

Evidence of Jhodi's hypocrisy using links toHIS OWN WORDS= "Masturbatory nonsense" #justjhodithings Jhodi, you can keep repeating that post as many times as you like. I'm perfectly content just showing (with HARD EVIDENCE!) what a dishonest and disingenuous human shitstain you are. Hey...

Hey remember when Jhodi claimed that Sulkowicz asked Nungesser for sexAFTER the alleged rape? He never found any evidence of that whatsoever, but he has yet to admit he was wrong. He even, and I swear to God this is true, tried to pass off"We need to have a Paul-Emma chill sess and talk about...

More delicious hypocrisy:

Remember this, Jhodi? The last time you tried to censor discussion with a giant straw man? Pepperidge farm remembers.

Aha! See, found yer' problem right here. See right there, where it says "substantially altered these texts and email"? See that? That's what we call one o'them classic "straw mans", hear? That's what's gummin' up your little argument. So two new straw men, PLUS an objectively false statement...

Sorry if any are reposts:

So, he's demanding proof for his straw man, but he isn't even reading the posts to see if the proof is there. Can't make this up, people.

The straw man, you mean? You're talking about your straw man, right? It's OK, no need to be coy. We're all adults capable of handling the truth. Just go ahead and say "We're now on day 3 of you failing to justify my straw man with evidence." ...Oh, shit, I almost forgot: Appeal to...

Literally "Jhodi's MO = 1st grade", by his own admission. Can't make this up.

^

Was I not clear? We're not moving on until you admit you appealed to popularity or made a pointless statement. These are officially your only options.

I don't see a confession there. Appeal to popularity or pointless statement. Now.

So, you're admitting that your popularity doesn't count for anything, then, and that bringing it up was completely irrelevant? Either you're appealing to popularity or you're making a pointless statement. Which is it? These are literally your only two options. Appeal to popularity or...

"I'm more popular than you, therefore I'm right!" - Jhodi "It's not an appeal to popularity!" - Jhodi

You're saying that because you've accumulated more of an arbitrary currency based exclusively on popularity, that your opinion is somehow worth more than mine or Sulrn's. That is absolutely an appeal to popularity. ...Right? Otherwise, what the fuck does it matter how many nets you have?

Oh, you mean like how I already admitted you would win anypopularity contestpolls?Twice, even? What's your fucking point? You can't have it both ways. Either you're saying your popularity matters, which is (by definition) an appeal to popularity, or you're saying that your popularity doesn't...

Your fallacy is appeal to popularity.