Search results

What have I ever been dishonest about? Feel free to link examples. Again, please be reminded that when I call someone out on something, I include a link to their actual words (like I've been doing with Jhodi the last few days). The least you can do, since you've got a team on your side, is keep...

Sulrn? Really? Can you link an example of everyone laughing at Sulrn? He's not like you and me, dude.

FUCK cell phones. THREE times over!

Done and done! The times over. Are we done now?

How are examples of what I'm talking about not sufficient evidence for the claim I am actually making? My claim: "Lawyers gonna lawyer" Jhodi's reaction: "WHAT? Give me proof that evidence has been tampered with, NOW!" Me: "Huh?, here are another couple of examples of lawyers lawyering...

I did, dude. I gave you three examples of exactly what I was talking about. What "evidence" are you waiting for?

No, not "these" interpretations. I'm specifically talking about your straw man du jour. It's very much a snowflake interpretation designed to save face. It's not working. You have yet to have even one person agree with that straw man, let alone "the majority". If you think I made a claim, you...

Why the fuck would you need a poll? Just link my posts where I make those claims. That's how hard evidence works, right? Go ahead. Pussy.

It's evidence that your straw man is very specific to your snowflake interpretation (how convenient!).

The only one of those claims I made was the Anita one, which I stand behind 100%. There was never any backtracking and I provided plenty of evidence. The rest of those are more straw men. I have not been "found guilty" of anything. Your straw man, no matter how much bravaccio and arrogance...

I guess you missed the part where DickTrickle also acknowledged that I never said what you claimed I said. You (against all reason) put all your eggs in that straw man basket, though, so I suppose we'll have to listen to you hee and haw about it for another couple of days.

Also, the claim that no evidence can convince me is objectively false. Again (again), the "Jackie" case had plenty of actual hard evidence that showed the rape claims were made up. That's simply not the case with Sulkowicz, where (say it with me) we don't know what happened.

DickTrickle gets it.

No, Jhodi, I'm saying the same thing I've always been saying: That lawyers frame the available evidence in a way that benefits their client. I've given at least three examples of that in this very case. I honestly have no idea why you're having so much trouble understanding this.

Oh, you're absolutely a hypocrite. Of that there can be no question. Would you like for me to link the HARD EVIDENCE?

Made up? Dude, the header says "Emma?s Efforts For Affection From Paul Go Unreciprocated". That's not a neutral description of the messages, that's an intentional framing of the information to suggest a specific narrative beneficial to Nungesser. Again, at the end of that quote, when they say...

Do you know the hypocrite Jhodi? The slimy and sniveling toadie? Double standards loves he, "Good for thee, not for me!" (Well, he's probably high on peyote.)

I don't have to do that at all. That was never my claim, as has been clarified repeatedly. How do you have the nerve to chastise whatsisname for not reading ALL your posts to get the supposedly necessary context where your repeated incorrect claims are no longer stupid, and yet you give...

Here, another example of lawyers framing the available evidence to suit their narrative: Did they doctor the messages? Nope. Did they withhold evidence? Nope. They took the messages and presented a narrative that does not necessarily reflect the reality of the situation, in order to benefit...

This never happened.

What we are observing is a wild Jhodi in his native state: Curled up into a ball, weeping openly, blocking out all outside stimuli. Again, THIS: Is the hill Jhodi wants to die on.

For those just joining us, the following post is what Jhodi considers me "making shit the fuck up": According to Jhodi, I am claiming that the evidence (the Facebook messages) has been edited or tampered with. No, I'm not kidding, that's actually what he's trying to pull. Can you see where I...

I can be lazy and repeat myself too, Jhodi. Heck, over the last few days I've stockpiled many examples of you being a hypocrite, of you ignoring information inconvenient to you, of you creating straw men, and of you failing to back up your claims. Again, I can back up all my claims about you...

You can only escape reality so long, Jhodi. Eventually you're going to have to face the music.

^

Reminder: "Hey Jhodi, that's a pretty phenomenally stupid point you're repeatedly making, explicitly and in your own words." "STRAW MAN!!! STRAW MAN!!!" (Later...) "Hey Tanoomba, here is claim you objectively never made. Nothing you've ever said suggests this claim. I will not...

Glad you could join us, Ridas! Your trolling is always welcome.

You don't get to dictate my paths or my claims. I'm not going to defend yourSTRAW MAN. I understand that you think yourSTRAW MANscored you some kind of imaginary point yesterday, but yourSTRAW MANis just that: aSTRAW MAN.

You mean the claim I never made? You mean your straw man? That claim? It's the straw man, right? (Meanwhile, he's conveniently ignoring his own failure to back up his original claim... The hypocrisy levels are over 9000...)

Actually, if you remember, the actual argument endedhere, when you failed to back up your claim that there was "hard evidence" suggesting Sulkowicz was lying. Everything after that was just cake.

Yes, you were riding that straw manreallyhard.

What "evidence that does exist"? No, seriously. What evidence? It's literally "Sulkowicz's behavior", which, for the millionth time, is entirely based on subjective interpretation, AKA "feels". Again, that exact same behavior could be interpreted by someone just as rational as you to SUPPORT...

Good morning, Jhodi. Good morning, Jhodi's straw man. How are you this Sunday?

Mario RPG up next (in about then minutes). It's a 3-hour run, which I know turns many off, but it's also a great, great game.

Satisfying ending after all that.

Holy fuck guy in 1st place just died and fucked his run.

And another one bites the dust.

One of the 4 Super Metroid racers just dropped out after some unfortunate luck.

Wait, if you're not reading a word (which is weird, considering this is coming right after I pointed out youwerereading my words), then how do you know if I'm linking court documents? Are you just looking for red text? All right, dude, here are mycourt documents. ...Just kidding. I...