Search results

Holy, shit! Googling "NES gif" produces some gold, man:

Don't cheapen the moment, Jhodi. What's the traditional 30-minute anniversary gift? A random NES gif? I think it's a random NES gif. Happy anniversary, darling.

Wait wait wait wait STOP THE PRESSES. Are you officially admitting that you'rereading my postsnow? I mean, you've set an arbitrary and ridiculous challenge, but you've also committed yourself to having to verify if I meet the challenge, right? ...Does this mean we're going steady now?

Oh, oh... I got one... Check it out: Jhodi's selective avoidance of all information that doesn't suit his narrative? That willful ignorance he's only happy to demonstrate at any given notice? You know, that same willful ignorance I'veobjectively demonstrated? Well, it's on display in full...

#notgonnadefendyourstrawman #shadowinterceptorrelm

Jhodi: #notgonnadefendyourstrawman #yourownwords #saturdaynight

I can not be more clear. There is no ascension beyond language, cultural norms, etymology, history or chaos theory that exists that would allow me to be more efficiently communicative with my message. ...And yet? You refuse for us to be held accountableby our own words. Let's get to brass...

Just hit 1 million in donations

Evidence of what? Let's make things simpler: You link something I've said (in my own words) and I will defend that claim. I absolutely will not defend a claim I've never made. It would be the height of idiocy to do otherwise. Ball's in your court.

Agreed. Who wants to pay for and sit through a shitty movie just to score a half-assed "point" for an imaginary "side"?

Also... WTF... "strawman recaps"? What was the straw man there? I am explicitly describing your EXACT CLAIM. I'm genuinely starting to wonder if Jhodi has any idea what a "straw man" is. His recent behavior certainly seems to indicate he has no clue whatsoever.

I'll admit that multiple-hour RPG runs aren't the most exhilarating, but damned if FFVI isn't one of the finest RPGs ever crafted.

Dude! I already admitted you were wrong! At least abide by your own conditions.

Recap: - You claim that I claimed Nungesser's lawyers edited/tampered with text messages to push a narrative. - I (objectively, mind you) never made that claim. - I DID claim that they were trying to present the evidence in a way that suggests a certain narrative. - I included a clear...

CHALLENGE ACCEPTED I admit you're wrong, Jhodi.

Jhodi right now:

I'm not going to provide evidence for a claim I've never made, no. Try again.

You're right. it wasn't "shit". What I showed was how lawyers can frame available evidence to suggest a specific narrative WITHOUT tampering with or editing evidence in any way. That was my point. I have clarified it many times now. Are you seriously planning on trying to force me to defend a...

Seriously? But I just showed you how information can be framed to suggest a scenario without editing or tampering with evidence in any way. I literally JUST SHOWED YOU that. How are you tuning this out?

I made a very clear post that was explicit in its meaning. You chose to infer something that is no way reflected by my actual words, and apparently you've decided to make this the hill you're going to die on. Desperate times call for desperate measures, I guess. Your "hail Mary" play isn't...

How anybody can read this and think I'm suggesting they edited or altered the text messages in any way is beyond me.

Yeah, that's not what my post says.

I never made the claimthat Paul Nungesser's attorneys manipulated the email and text transcripts in any way to make them appear more favorable to Paul Nungesser. It's up to you to prove otherwise if you intend to continue this flight of fancy of yours.

How many times do you intend on repeating this straw man? Let me know now, so I know how many posts to skip before the discussion can resume.

She wasn't "begging" to hang out with him. She was attempting to maintain the same friendliness they shared earlier because she mistakenly believed that talking things out with him would clear things up (she was being irrational, which she admits). He responded in just as friendly a manner as...

Jhodi, let me explain something to you, because you apparently don't know this: It's a lawyer's job to take all the available evidence and present in in such a way that (hopefully) benefits their client. THAT'S WHAT LAWYERS DO. That you can take this simple fact and interpret it as...

STRAW MAN (take note, this is what a straw manactuallyis) Never made that claim. STRAW MAN. Actually, I do have such evidence. Did you seriously not notice the example I've mentioned several times now? You know, the one where they take a jokey Facebook message and present is as though Sulkowicz...

You're so desperate to salvage something from the flaming wreckage of your crashed argument that you've taken to picking apart my posts for information that ISN'T EVEN THERE, then putting all your eggs in that basket. I would legit feel sorry for you, I really would, if it weren't for the...

You're an idiot. No, seriously, all jokes aside, you are an absolute idiot. Do you not understand that nothing in the quoted post indicates I'm challenging the validity of the text messages? Do you seriously not understand that? You really do only see what you want to see.

You seem to be under the impression that I am arguing against the validity of the text messages as evidence. I am not. I am saying, as I've always been saying, that the text messages are not hard evidence that Sulkowicz is lying. I gave an example of how one message ("Fuck me in the but")...

Tasbot playing through Mario 1, 2, 3 and Lost Levels simultaneously with one set of inputs was pretty cool.

I never said it was a case of "he said, she said". I said that the information presented was part of Nungesser's case against the University. As such, it has specifically been framed to support his side of the story, with implications made that are neither neutral nor impartial. For instance...

I didn't memorize every detail, no. They had anal sex (according to Nungesser) twice. I repeat: So fucking what? You sound pretty confident in your ability to make deductions based on evidence. Spell it out for me: What, in all the available information, leads you to believe Sulkowicz...

I've debunked your straw man retardation already. Try to keep up, dear.

Things Jhodi believes count as a "straw man": - Using his exact words, making an explicit, unambiguous point on multiple occasions. - Stating a clear fact (that the information presented was part of Nungesser's testimony). Things Jhodi doesn't believe count as a "straw man": - Making...

Sorry I read that as "Emma asked for anal, but it didn't happen that time." Having said that... let's say they did have anal sex in the spring... So what? What do you think that proves? Serious question. Also, I guess you meant to say "both times" instead of "all the times"?

So once again, you've made a hollow claim you refuse to back up. As usual.

Straw man? What the fuck are you even talking about? What straw man?

Not true. I have said all of that is, at best, circumstantial evidence (FAR from being "hard evidence"), and that it is very subject to personal interpretation. Because it's non-conclusive and subject to interpretation, the only logical conclusion is "We don't know what happened". More...