Search results

Cherry picking? You've been repeating this shit since early May, asshole. You were called on it. Deal with it.

Gonna continue to be a must-watch for me.

Well, the Portal games are not terribly reflex-based. It's co-op puzzle solving, which might work really well after the initial learning curve of getting used to the controls.

THANK YOU. He's been repeating that flawed logic for ages, I was sincerely wondering why everyone was letting him get away with it. +1 to you.

Or, you know, you could just not come read posts in the Rickshaw.

In the interest of saving time, I will no longer address your pointless personal attacks against me. They add nothing to the discussion, serve only to illustrate your colossal ignorance, and are not worthy of my attention. I repeat, "hard evidence" and "overwhelming evidence" are not subject to...

Yes, I do. HARD evidence and OVERWHELMING evidence are not subject to interpretation. I know you love this little masturbatory fantasy of yours, but I am not a "religious thinker" in any way. In the case of "Jackie", there was plenty of hard evidence. I would even go as far as calling it...

The problem is the evidence is nowhere near "overwhelming". That's a fact. You don't understand this, and apparently you will never understand this, but that's your main problem. You don't understand what "hard evidence" is, and you don't understand what "overwhelming evidence" is. You're...

As I said approximately one million times: There is none. Wrong. You can NOT justifiably conclude that. In fact, you can not justifiably conclude ANYTHING. You can guess. You can assume. You can believe. But you absolutely can NOT conclude. Your fallacy is appeal to possibility. Wrong again...

So, for the record, Jhodi is officially saying that "evidence" and "hard evidence" are the same thing. I'm not making this up. His rationale? "I put 'hard evidence' into Google and it gave me the definition of 'evidence', so they're the same!" Just when you think he can't sink any lower, he...

Let me help you: According to Wikipedia (who correctly equates "hard evidence" with a "smoking gun"): a reference to an object or fact that serves asconclusive evidenceof a crime or similar act Best answer on Yahoo Answers: Well, it's kind of like something you knowbeyond a shadow of a...

HARDevidence, you fucking troglodyte.

Oh, almost forgot: You're a moron.

Citation needed.

Lithose confirmed doesn't understand what "hard evidence" is.

It was a pun, wasn't it?

I liked Back to the Future. It's worthwhile for further adventures of Doc and Marty alone.

Portal 1 & 2 are great co-op.

Thanks! Those look interesting, but I definitely want to play it vanilla to start. I am kind of getting a "Game Genie" vibe, though!

Didn't read.

Jhodi confirmed Creatard.

Also, please note that Jhodi is actively and explicitly rejecting any information that doesn't suit his narrative with his "didn't read" posts. You know, like religious people do? You can't make this shit up.

What is my "religion", Jhodi?

Good thing I'm not, nor have I ever been, a "creatard", then.

Finally, something we can agree on! I know exactly why that is, by the way. I've explained as much many times over.

Jhodi:

So even after you establish your own rule, you break it in order to avoid any information that doesn't suit your narrative. Typical Jhodi.

You've explicitly made clear that you are unwilling to read any post of mine that is 3 sentences or longer. You've created an arbitrary limitation that, by necessity, prevents any actual discussion from taking place.

I know you read that one.

So you admit that you're the reason no actual discussion is taking place. Much obliged.

Called it.

You have demonstrated no such thing. Objectively. Reminder: Your only attempt to back up your claim washere, and you failed miserably: None of that constitutes "hard evidence" by ANY metric. If you had even a shred of integrity or honestly you would have thrown in the towel and admitted that...

Again: - I employed no burden-shifting fallacies. YOU made a claim that YOU were unable to back up. - I never appealed to perfection. With no proof she was lying and no proof she was telling the truth, then by definition we don't know what happened. It really is that simple. ...Keep...

Whose fault do you think that is, Mr. "Didn't read"?

I wasn't really interested until I saw this video: Now I intend to buy it, but I'm willing to wait for it to be offered at a big discount.

That's one way to do it, but I would have the nagging feeling in the back of my head the entire game that I'm not doing something I should be doing that was explained in the tutorial I skipped. Plus, I absolutely can't stand controller map screens. Nothing gets me less in the mood to play a new...

Incidentally, pointing out how you use "didn't read" to avoid having to address points that contradict your narrative is an EXCELLENT rebuttal, thank you very much.

"Hit the mark?" "No cogent rebuttal?" The fuck you talking about? How am I suppose to have a rebuttal for your open admission of willful ignorance? Tell me, Jhodi, is this fantasy world you find yourself in the result of your meds, or the result ofnottaking your meds?

How convenient. Again.