Search results

Sorry, didn't realize three sentences is too much for your limited comprehension skills to handle.

How this? Is OK? Understand OK?

All that would prove is that whoever voted that way in the poll allows you to speak for them. You do not, nor have you ever, nor will you ever, speak for everyone. If you need to keep referencing what you think "everyone" believes instead of relying on the strength of your own argument, then...

...As well as the mistake of believing you can speak for everyone.

And you're still making the mistake of believing I care what you think about my opinion.

So I gave in and bought this during the Steam Summer Sale. I very much look forward to getting into it, but man, modern games and their tutorials bug the shit out of me. The whole "press this button to do this, press that button to do that, (repeat for several buttons and functions), and now...

But do you remember having a psychotic meltdown that got the thread shawed? It was quite the spectacle, and set the bar for just how much of a nutbar you were capable of being when a discussion doesn't go your way.

You're the one who's famous for his meltdowns, dude. Remember when you got the Zimmerman thread shawed? Pepperidge Farm remembers.

Hey Jhodi...

Again, if you don't like it...

It sure does!

Ha ha ha I LOVE the salt. LOVE IT. No wonder you dislike me so much. I bring out the worst in you and expose you as a complete moron... repeatedly! A smarter man would pick his battles and make sure he was well-prepared to defend himself, but you are not a smarter man. You are a pompous...

Hay Chanur, can you guess what one of the two topics is?

Dude, this is what this thread is for. If you don't like to watch me destroy Jhodi, stay out.

OK, I'm calling it: Time of death of Jhodi's claim that "hard evidence" exists that shows Sulkowicz was lying:11:37 AM on July 6 As anybody can plainly see, that post is his first actual attempt to back up his claim, but it includes absolutely no "hard evidence" whatsoever. I will...

Yes, that's an extremely convenient way to avoid admitting you are wrong.

Off on all counts. Try again.

I've never demanded any of that. Again, my claim is that WE DON'T KNOW what happened. Proof does NOT EXIST that will show her story to be true or a fabrication. Why does this bother you so much? Why are you incapable of accepting that we don't know and will likely never know what happened? Why...

"The university found she had insufficient proof to back up her story" DOES NOT EQUAL "The university concluded she was lying"

No they didn't. You're an idiot.

All of this is wrong. Funny how you shifted from "hard evidence" that is "copious" to just "sufficient evidence", though. That's called goalpost shifting, and it's stupid to resort to in this case because you're STILL WRONG. There is not sufficient evidence to show she was lying. There also...

"Extremely likely" according to WHO? YOU don't get to make that call, idiot. "Hard evidence" negates the need for measuring likeliness, because conclusions can be drawn from the proof alone. That is not the case here, which (again) any reasonable person would be able to admit.

That's not "hard evidence", youcolossal retard. That is, literally and explicitly,FEELS. FEELS which are influenced by personal world views, by personal bias, by personal ideology, and by personal need to push specific narratives. Actual "hard evidence" requires no personal interpretation, as I...

Again, because you apparently have a tremendous amount of difficulty understanding this: My claim: WE DON'T KNOW what happened. Proof does NOT EXIST that can allow us to conclusively know what happened. Your claim: Sulkowicz was lying, which has been proven by (copious) hard evidence...

I dunno, Jhodi, how many times are you going to pretend that Shakespeare quote has any merit?

I didn't shift any burden. The burden is on YOU, idiot.

I repeat:

As usual, every single word out of your mouth is, at best, an ignorance-fueled misrepresentation of reality and, at worst, an outright lie. - I'm not crying about anything. Your personal attacks are worthless shitposts. That's a fact. - I haven't lost this battle, as you have repeatedly...

*you're

I'll use all three: - Because you would have convinced yourself of that regardless. - Because your whole schtick is just pretending your scoring points against me, even as your own arguments crash and burn. - Because you're an idiot.

Dodge, dodge, dodge. You're as predictable as you are ignorant. Which is to say: EXTREMELY.

That's not a point. We were talking about Sulkowicz, remember? I said there's no proof she was lying about being raped. You claimed there was plenty of proof (you said "hard evidence"). Where is it? You keep trying to derail the discussion (ha!) into attacks against me, which is both...

Do you see what you're doing right now, Jhodi? How you're not actually making any points at all? How you're stubbornly refusing to back up your claims, preferring instead to make the entire argument about attacking me personally? This is EXACTLY why I said I wasn't going to go through this again...

What argumentation patterns? Whatever patterns you think I demonstrate, how can they possibly be worse than your refusal to back up your claims? What projection? I honestly have no clue what it is you think I'm "projecting". Every observation I've made about you has been exactly that: About...

How many times are you going to make claims then run away with your tail between your legs when asked to back them up? Every time? Is it every time, Jhodi? It's every time, isn't it?

Ha ha I broke him.

What are you scared of, Jhodi?

I did my part, Jhodi. I explained why you're wrong, both succinctly and in detail (so there can be no misunderstanding). Instead of spewing more hot air, why don't you actually try to make a point for once? Here, let me help you. Here is YOUR CLAIM: So, instead of presenting this argument...

Insults based on nothing it is, then. Enjoy your bubble, you coward.