Search results

Ok, Pharm: What am I not doing that you think I should be doing?

*sigh*

Dude, you came in concern trolling about how I spend my time. I responded to you honestly and sincerely. You called me "intentionally ignorant". What am I ignoring? What am I missing? Oh, let me guess: This is all part of my convoluted game to get people to hate me because I get off on it or...

I am not.

I've gotten negged for it. So have Mire and Marmac. We all learned our lesson. Oblig jimmy rustle: I bought some cheap dishwashing liquid. Turns out it's complete garbage and produces virtually no foam at all. I've gotta use six times the amount I normally would to get through a load of...

All or nothing for you, too? That's a shame. Well, you're still a good poster and I like your style. See you on the surface.

Ironically, I'm the most "reachable" person here.

Jesus Christ. Guy 1 is arguing about whether or not superhero villains are alternate versions of the heroes. Guy 2 is arguing about whether or not the villains are arch-enemies. Get on the same fucking page.

Worse than Dungeons and Dragons? Worse than Wing Commander? Worse than Battlestar Galactica? I'm seriously asking.

I agree. I can't stand the assholes who abuse a system just to prove that it can be abused. Yes, we know assholes exist, we don't need people to prove that to us by intentionally acting like assholes. In fact, I agree with most of what you've said in this thread, even if I think implementing it...

You're absolutely insane.

Why, how many times have you been hit?

That's a remarkably accurate description. The only part you left out was "using logic and reason" after "he shits all over that". They try to take me down, they lose, they realize they have numbers on their side, they pretend they've won. As always, when anybody is ready and willing to...

Have you not seen Jhodi's schtick? I am pretty clearly being trolled. On the other hand, the fact that I keep beating him at his own game, under his own rules, despite his attempts to change reality to suit his needs, is sooooo satisfying.

Well, to my credit I've got multiple people conceding that I am being trolled. In other words, I am responding honestly to people being dishonest. I'm OK with that.

Everybody's gotta learn to include a pic when you post in the FSR. Everybody.

"You people"? Get the fuck out of here with that racist shit.

Hey Lith, did you find those messages where Sulkowicz was pressuring Nungesser into a relationship yet? ...Didn't think so.

Accidentally gave someone a +net instead of a -net for posting without a picture in the FSR thread. Jimmies rustled.

You think a lot of sixteen year olds would put a death sentence on their social lives and reputation just to bust a nut in a locker room?

Well, they do get free drinks.

"Our successes are built partially on things that are out of our control" You're trying to tell me this is easily refuted? Get the fuck out of here. The problem here is some people seem to be conflating "everyone has opportunity" with "everyone has the same opportunity". Those are not...

Still buttmad because I embarrassed you yesterday, Fana?

I made one of those four claims, and backed it up extensively. Keep trolling.

OK, to recap: We are not allowed to state a simple axiom (in this case, that our successes are built partially on things that are out of our control) without some perpetual victims claiming it is a personal attack against them. Got that, kids? The thought police has decided that undeniable...

Again: Wanna bet?

Oh, and I didn't claim to understand the term better than "anybody else on the forum". I said I understood it better than YOU. Reading comp, man. You mean once they start engaging me, right? Most of the hypocrisy I expose is stuff in conversations I had nothing to do with. As for the dishonesty...

Maybe you need to read the thread again.

I understood what the term meant better than you did, Jhodi. But you got me on a technicality I didn't feel like arguing, and I admitted defeat. In any case, your tendency to flip out over perceived injustices against you is so over-the-top and well known that a legit meltdown is...

Poe's law at work.

No no no, not to sway their opinions of me. To expose them as hypocrites and liars. Which I do, successfully, all the time. You think because they don't admit it that I have failed, and that is where you and I see things differently. I have come out on top in many discussions, and each one was...

Case in point. Also, the most hypocritical statement he's made in months.

Not at all. I'm saying that benefiting from something you had no control over is, by definition, luck.

Also ironic, considering Jhodi's well-earned reputation for being the most easily-goaded poster on this forum.

Prosperity - Having had anything to do with that prosperity = Luck

Ironic, coming from the guy who gives me 80% of the attention I get.

They wanted you to be born lucky, they worked hard to achieve that goal, and they succeeded! YOU hadnothing to do with it. YOUdidn't earn it. YOU hadno control over it whatsoever. That's what luck IS. Instead of trying to take credit for their achievements, you can try to follow their example...

Did you know that the word "hard-on" originated in 1922, but it was used as an adjective as early as 1893? Apparently it evolved from a combination of the words "hard" and "on". Funny how your view of the word can effect(sic)your meaning.

No, Fana. Everything your ancestors achieved before you was outside of your control, therefore you are lucky to benefit from it. We are lucky to have been born in this time, after so much has been achieved. If we fuck up the planet, those who are born after us will be unlucky to be been born at...