Search results

I didn't "obfuscate" that fact, Iexplicitly highlighted that fact.Can you not read?

Find a hundred 13 year-olds. Ask them what Watergate is. Ask them what Gamergate is. Get back to me with the results.

Well, no, not that one. I've already openly acknowledged that myself. But, do you see? That's exactly what I mean. You completely ignore things I've already said that directly contradict whatever it is you're trying to say about me (in this case, that I supposedly don't realize the "-gate"...

Either he was another John who decided to claim his territory or they went from dating to engaged WAY too quick. Not sure which is better...

Sorry, dude, I'm trying to accommodate your demands but you're being extremely unhelpful. Why don't you just TELL me how much urine you're standing in?

What's the difference between that inaccurate, context-free click-baity description of a discussion and the references to "blue-hairs", "land whales", "gender studies safe-space" caricatures we hear about here literally every day? See this exact "joke" gets made here multiple times a day, every...

Straw man? At worst, what I said was a mild exaggeration, since I don't actually know how much urine you're currently standing in. They sure do, brother. Not all of them, obviously, but they sure do.Here's a guyplaying a custom mission where he literally kills strippers and piles their corpses...

"I get joy from this." "Thiswhere you get your joy?" "STRAW MAN!!! WHARBLGARBLE" (Indecipherable screeching accompanied by a puddle of fury urine forming at Jhodi's ankles.) "Holy shit. OK then: You get joy fromthis?" "TOO LATE! TOO LATE! WHAAAAAARBLE" (Screeching intensifies, urine...

"I'm an idiot so desperate to score imaginary points against a perceived enemy that I will ignore literally everything that doesn't fit the retarded narratives I love to push." Cool story.

OK, allow me to rephrase then: Well, shit, I actually feel bad for you now. You get joy from insulting someone using silly, childish, garbage insults that he couldn't possibly care less about because they're objectively based on nothing? Damn, son. ...Better?

What's the straw man? If you can't tell me, then you are the one being disingenuous.

Well, shit, I actually feel bad for you now. That's where you get your joy? Insulting someone using silly, childish, garbage insults that he couldn't possibly care less about because they're objectively based on nothing? Damn, son.

And yet, when literally the exact same thing was happening in the post before Drae's: ...That's perfectly acceptable. "Good enough for me, but not for thee."

I'm glad you choose to shitpost here, Jhodi. Helps keep the surface threads cleaner.

Unless you're blaming the terribleness of the song on the fact that the movie stars women, nobody's calling you a misogynist.

Ignorance has nothing to do with it. Cultural relevance does.

Meh, I'm mildly embarrassed by the way they chose to word their response. It's a Watergate reference in the same wayall of theseare Watergate references. It very much became its own thing, and Nintendo would not have included that joke if it hadn't. You're still ignoring the fact that the...

Welcome to Rerolled. I'm guessing you don't realize you're openly advocating thought policing.

Why not? Do you have a point or just hollow rhetoric? (Just kidding, I already know the answer.)

It's not.

Incidentally, Ambi, this post is retarded. Do you even know who plays Nintendo games? You're comparing a historical event fromover 40 years agoto a recent cultural event that is still very much part of the public consciousness, ESPECIALLY among gamers. I'm not sure if you noticed, but...

Don't you mean: "I know you I are but what am they she?"

Did you? Read it again, numb nuts.

The conversation I was referring to was in the GamerGate thread. Sometimes conversation does happen here too, though, despite people's best efforts to ensure otherwise.

Take your shitposting to this thread, please. Adults are trying to have a conversation.

Austin Powers drove a steam roller.

I think expansion would be a natural result of sticking the fruit up there.

What are you even responding to, Err? I mean, I get that you're trolling (your closing statement made that clear), but I don't know in regards to what.

Touch?.

Well, of course it's easy to make fun of people when you can lie about them through your teeth and never have to back anything up! Heck, we've even forgiven Jhodi for admitting he masturbates to pictures of dead puppies!

What past position did I contradict? You don't even have to quote me, just tell me what my position was. I'm genuinely curious. I'll tell you what I see happening here: There hasn't been a Tanoomba dogpile in a while, so you're nitpicking and looking for any little thing you can try to hold...

Oh, great, Jhodi's decided to make up my position whole cloth again. Do you intend on spending another six pages arguing against stuff I've never said this time, too? One thing's for sure: You're GUARANTEED not going to quote me saying anything close to whatever wacky things your unmedicated...

ENTERTAINING videos. Videos worthy of people's attention. How the fuck do you figure? Jhodi, not sure what your point is or how it connects in any way to anything I've said.

Dude. A popular theory as to how to combat Islam is through open ridicule and mockery, right? And yet, when it was pointed out that any of you are free to contribute to this ridicule at any time, everyone hid under their blankets saying they didn't want to get killed (basically showing radical...

So isthis guybraver than the rest of you, putting his very life on the line for a YouTube video, or did he just have the time, means and motivation to do what you say can't be done?

Was it really about being offended, though? Just seemed like two people who really enjoyed talking about butts to me. Wu came off as more human than I've ever heard her before, going into the technical and design aspects of digital butts. As someone who doesn't really give a shit about either...

Why would I give up? I'm winning.

Yeah, that's the point.