Search results

I never thought I would agree with Wizardhawk about anything, but... Damn straight.

There's a couple of days left for theIndieGala Every Monday Bundle. 5 out of 7 games are 2D shooters if you're into that sort of thing (I am). I think the bundle is worth it for Riddled Corpses alone, a twin-stick zombie shooter with an emphasis on leveling-up characters. You could do a lot...

Yeah, that guy was a bit much. Heart might have been in the right place but he was a terrible poster.

Quaid: "How have none of you morons posted links to John Stewart attacking Palin personally?" Seriously, someone please get on this.

Cad: "Well, if you start out with the mindset that anybody criticizing people you agree with is doing it to be spiteful and there's no comedy, parody, or legitimacy to it, then you get to where Tanoomba is." This is not my mindset and never has been. Cad: "Thundercunt or whatever is...

Doc: "Tanoomba redefining words again. One man can't circle jerk." Did I say you were alone in your bubble?

Doc: "It's like you were designed in a lab to retarded." It's like you go out of your way to intentionally avoid addressing confronting any point that you can't circle-jerk to. Christ, the inside of your bubble must be absolutely disgusting.

Doc: "Totally agree about your post bro. None of your distinctions between thunderfoot and Stewart have any meaning. Stop presenting your perception of things as facts." What the fuck are you even talking about? Stewart and Thunderf00t are not the same person. They do not do the same thing...

Doc: "Absolutely everything in this post is meaningless distinctions you have created out of thin air and are projecting onto the material based on your own biases." This is nonsense. Just pointless drivel. I guess you used up your one point for the year so you're back to making hollow...

Really? I was actually kind of stunned Vvoid went through the effort of making that post specifically because of how badly it DOESN'T work. Jon Stewart is known as a comedian. That's how he became a star. Show me any of his videos about Palin and you will hear a studio audience laughing...

Yeah, I'll get right on top of that.

No worries. I'm sure your response is a riot.

Guys.

It's still hand-wringing busybodyism when you turn somebody possibly being wrong about something that doesn't matter into a war waged through righteous indignation.

Doc: "He asked you about Matt Damon and you immediately turned it into a rant about poor victimized Anita. It was entirely unrelated except in your very special mind." And I answered that it was just people looking to be offended. I went on to add that this is not a phenomenon specific to...

Fana: "no no it's the bubble you see, that everyone else lives in except tanoomba cause his bubble is wait I still don't get it, myriad of people from different social, politicial and economic backgrounds are in a bubble he's in a what?" LOL "everyone". Lith: "Watching his twist a...

Don't worry, Doc. You'll get it some day. That bubble isn't protecting you, it's blinding you. The day you realize that is the day you set yourself free.

Chaos, I'm probably not the best person to explain the "Matt Damon fiasco" to you since I've never heard of it until you mentioned it. I did a quick Google search, though, and it certainly seems as though it is yet another example of people looking for things to be offended by. If you really...

Seriously. Seems kind of unfair.

What's an asshat?

Drunk thread's that-a-way.

Oh, Cad, darling, the anti-Sarkeesies are the VERY DEFINITION of "hand-wringing busybodies". There is no group alive today that better encapsulates the term. It's not my fault you think that's a "play" but, as I pointed out, that's a pretty sturdy bubble you've got there. And nothin' getting...

Lith: "Yeah, you just claim it, again and again, as if it were true." Well, to be fair, it's your word vs Sark's, and she's shown significantly more integrity and intellectual honesty in her work than you have in your posts so... Yeah. Lith: "It's on her youtube channel, you know...

Doc: "I think my head might explode" At least we know there won't be much brain matter to clean up.

Agraza: "nothing is absurd for tan" Would that were true, Agraz. Would that were true. Rerolled has shown me that absurdity not only exist, it has no limits.

Lith: "Evidence? Show me evidence, Tan." Like I said, I ain't got none. Heck, is there even a way to search through Tweets efficiently? Your word against Sark's until then. Lith: "Was right after the uproar about her 25 benefits of gaming male, and she was giving major national...

Fana: "public figures get harrased, men more than woman, what does that have to do with thunderfoot again?" I dunno. Lith keeps trying to make this all about Thunderf00t. All I pointed out is that his attack pieces lead to spikes in the harassment Sark receives. Erronius: "Tanoomba...

Cad: "Welp, I gave it my one try. He's all yours hodj" You sure did, and you failed miserably. If you're gonna pass the baton to anyone, though, try to make it to someone who's not on my ignore list. Hodj is not going to be able to succeed where you failed when he's not even being engaged.

As for you, Lith: First of all, I appreciate that you had the maturity to admit (through your silence) that there was nothing wrong with "my" definitions of harassment and that you were grasping at straws trying to argue it earlier. It takes a big man to admit to his errors by pretending they...

Holy, shit, Cad. Just... wow. At no point in that rambling shitpost did you even come close to expressing a coherent thought. Cad: "Sarkeesian is co-opting the term harassment to make it look like she gets threats, intimidation, violence and other things normal people would consider offensive...

Cad: "And really, is anyone shocked he's here arguing the definition of words? I'm not" Who arguing definitions? Seems like it's everybody BUT me, frankly. I found NINE definitions that ALL support what Sarkeesian described, but somehow here in Bizarro land it's me that's arguing...

Cad: "You know he's not going to respond to you guys. A coherent response that doesn't reverse himself is pretty much impossible. So he's working out of the playbook: ignore, pretend it didn't happen, couple weeks later, claim victory and continue on." I have literally no idea what you're...

Quaid: "Guys, Palin is an acceptable target for personal attack & discrediting because she's a conservatard. Stewart's pieces on her fall under the umbrella of 'legitimate criticism' because he is a liberal approved satirist. This isn't that difficult to understand." Is this supposed to be...

Not sure if Lith is going to get back to me. Perhaps he, too, follows the "be on offense at all times, never give an INCH" school of debate. Anyway, I might as well start picking apart his last post, yeah? Lith: "How do you know Stewarts work doesn't lead to harassment Tan?" I don't...

Please note: The above is SATIRE that makes heavy use of hyper-obvious humor. Just in case anybody wasn't sure.

Woah there, Lith. There's a LOT wrong with you post, but let's do one thing at a time. First of all, you expressed concerns about "my" definition of harassment. I have provided you with the source of said definition as well as many more definitions that seem to say the same thing. Do you...

For shits and giggles, let's dig up a few more definitions of "harass/harassment" (in the order they appear when Googling "harassment"). thefreedictionary.com "harass: To subject (another) to hostile or prejudicial remarks or actions; pressure or intimidate." www.merriam-webster.com...

Quaid: "To get that result, you have to be located in Canada and Google just the term 'harassment'. If you do what anybody with more than 6 months internet experience would do Google 'define harassment' you get the result posted by Brikker (even Canadians)." To be fair, Lithose made it clear...