Search results

In the voting booth? Again, I'm saying that we have a great system. I'm saying it offers more than ZERO control (which is what we have with BP, or We're-Gonna-Drop-Space-Rocks-On-You Inc, or whatever).

There were actually more developments (including an offer to extradite him to Pakistan to have him tried there). As for how real they were or whatever that's debatable but the fact of the matter is it's not legal or reasonable to demand extradition without providing evidence. Let's flip...

It's not wrong. Why do you think the right hates government so much? It's an institution that can only bemostlycontrolled with money because, at the end of the day, there is still a voting booth that people can walk into. They can use money to buy campaigns, and politicians, and whatever...

There was plenty of reporting on it (though not so much from our press):http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2001...stan.terrorism

Yeah they totally DID ask for evidence when we demanded extradition and we totally DID bomb the shit out of them for it.

The difference is that I can operate some direct bit of power over the leadership of government that I cannot over BP. And you can make all the arguments you want about being able to buy stock or choosing to not shop there after the fact. The fact of the matter is, that is not even remotely...

I'm sure that'll go great.

That's called "intellectually lazy." That I took a break from posting (just as you did) so I could wrap up a project at work on time?

No. The decent back and forth ran right up until here:http://www.rerolled.org/showthread.p...l=1#post165200You are wrong. No, I'll do whatever I feel like.

It's really not, but we've already established that you're too intellectually lazy to actually look at or try to deconstruct my real arguments.

There wasn't any problem with decent conversation until the crybabies decided to have a full page pity party. Seriously, go back and look at it prior to hodj's whining.

Well that's really stupid. 1. I'm long since done attending classes. I spend all day learning about stuff as part of my job and through my interests (like debate). 2. That would be a fucking moronic metric in any case. Intellectual laziness in the context of a debate has to do with your...

lol Really? This is where you're going to go with this?

So what?

While we're at it, lets delete the colossal word-turd I was responding to.

This is what's known as "intellectually lazy."

lol Just noticed this. You are sad. I feel bad for you now.

Says the guy who keeps telling the guy who's asking for a response that really he tried to get the last word in (by using the oh-so-sneaky tactic of making a fucking gigantic reply that you'd have to be blind to miss).

No need beyond intellectual honesty.

Maybe while you're waiting you can come up with an actual counter-argument that's not "you tried to sneak that 20-page response past me just to get in the last word...lulz." Good luck.

lol Yeah, that's what you've done.

Take note of what he's cut out here, folks.

Retarded. You're fucking retarded.

No, I didn't you fucking retard. Your post was terrible (barely fucking coherent). Right. I took a break. So did you, dipshit. NO RETARD, I DON'T WANT THE LAST WORD. I KEEP FUCKING ASKING FOR YOU TO MAKE A COUNTER-ARGUMENT AND YOU'RE TOO FUCKING LAZY OR STUPID TO DO IT. It's not a matter of...

That sounds like a problem with you. So it's infantile and pedantic when I take a break but then come back and respond to the longest, most sprawling stream-of-conscious brain dump of an argument I've ever seen from a dude who has, EXPLICITLY, said that he likes the fact that I actually look at...

Idareyou to explain the relevance of the gap.

I don't know about the gun control thread, but in the main politics thread the dumbdumbs are the minority.

It would only be a delusion if it weren't true. Look, right now I'm sitting at 0 open substantive points that I disagree with and have failed to provide substantive responses for. If you havespecificinstances to show me where you think that's not true (or you'd like to generate some), by all...

Mostly just confused by all the butthurt stupids here. You know you do have the freedom to try to mount a counter-argument, right? Like you don't just have to cry your salty, salty tears. You can actually try to demonstrate why you're right. Like...I get it why you wouldn't bother at this...

What the fuck does how long I was away have to do with anything? Also how the fuck was I trying to "sneak in" anything with a GIANT post responding to every wrong thing you said? That would be the worst attempt to "sneak" anything in fucking ever. Seriously dude, are you fucking retarded?

If you guys had real counter-arguments you'd have made them.

lol umadbro?

What constitutes "aggression?"

Would that be before or after we smoked 'em out?

What does this mean? That you think there would be any point prior to them attacking us that we should attack them?

lolfissilefizzle

lol uh huh I didn't need to read them to know what you were saying is fucking stupid. I just needed you to say it.

What argument are we supposed to derive from those links? That NK represents a serious threat?

Sounds like we better invade them now then before they really get the ability to nuke themselves.

Yeah I've only seen a couple episodes of smallville so I couldn't comment. The last Superman thing I saw was Returns where they took his one weakness and