Search results

Simply because it is a binary choice and infinity is equal to infinity, in this case, since we are using whole numbers. To try to state it another way, you cant have more infinity of [object 1], than infinity of [object 2], if those are your only two options. In order for one choice to happen a...

Ok, so again, we are only talking about the chance that Mark helped his father subjugate earth because that is what started this whole conversation. All the other different arrangement of atoms that make up totally unconnected universe, where Mark did not have to make that choice, do not mater...

No, by you asking that question, it is clear that we are talking about two different things, but I don't know how to explain it any other way.

We are not talking about all verses in the multiverse, only a subsection of them. In this subsection there is a binary choice. Either Mark sides with his father and subjugates the earth, or he doesn't. Both occur the same amount of times, which is an infinite amount of times. If you wanted to...

You don't seem to understand infinity.

Sure, I can see if you have more options of outcome it would change the ratio, but that's a 1 out of 10 choice, this is a 1 out of 2 choice (he helps his dad subjugate earth or he doesn't). You can't just add additional outcomes to a binary choice, just because. Even if Galactus teleports Mark...

If there is some kind of limit on the amount of infinite multiverses, it would no longer be infinite?

That's basically saying the same thing, I guess. As I understand it, there can't be a majority of any event in an infinity of multiverses because there would be no way to measure it. If an event can either result in outcome 1 or outcome 2 (Mark sides with his father, or he doesn't), there should...

He said there can be a majority in infinity, I asked for clarification because I don't understand how there can be.

So what does the majority of a binary outcome, when both have an infinite number of instances, look like? Edit: As it relates to infinite multiverses.

*fans suggested favorites

Did they not invite The Critical Drinker to a screening so he can get his 0 day review done?!?

To make believable characters, the writers should be able to write them having bad/wrong opinions. The best I can distil it down to is: he is wrong and therefor your statement based on his wrong opinion doesn't add anything to your argument. As for the real life stuff I'm not sure wtf you even...

A finite multiverse would be even dumber than an infinite one, because then they would really need to try to make up some reason why it would be finite. I would wager that's a reason Marvel writers keep switching back and forth, because both are dumb, but trying to make it finite is harder to...

I agree that the human brain has a very difficult time understanding probability and statistics (mine included). There are an infinity of dimensions where Mark sided with his father, and there are an infinity of dimensions where he didn't, therefor there can be no majority. What someone...

There is no majority in something that is infinite, which is another reason why multiverse shit is shit. On your other points, I somewhat agree, but I think they tried to keep Nolan more like a sleeper plant from a spy show. Where he can't risk a child letting something slip, and possibly tip...

One Piece just showed how you can properly do fantasy and outlandish anime stuff in live action. Riot showed how successful a show based on a game can be if you keep total control over it (One Piece creator also had veto power). I would assume Nintendo is going to follow their lead, where they...

Nope, House of the Dragon has it's own thread. It's also a prequel, not a sequel to GoT.

Araysar vs. Dicktrickle - No one beats a dead horse like Brosar, no one spams Telagram like Brosar Lightning Lord Rue vs. frenzied wombat - Wombat is fighting the good fight, the fight against the forum dogpile Bandwagon bs. Ambiturner - I want to make a bandwagon joke, but Ambi has had too...

Did you mean to timestamp that? The whole thing is fairly interesting; from what I remember he is calling for reevaluating how physics is looked at, since a unified theory seems to be as out of reach today as it was 30 years ago. I don't know enough about it to judge how far out there he is though.

I don't know much about them. Is that good or bad?

Google knows the future; the algo got me to click this Dave VS Dave video last week. It's the worlds leading flat earth expert (Dave) debating some educated guy (Dave), which two other dudes "moderating" it: Obligatory pic:

Most of that is just your feels and none of it matters to what lives on in the collective memory. Blade Runner 2049 is sitting at 8.0 on IMDB with 600K+ votes and Blade Runner (1982) is at a whole 8.1 with 800k+ votes. In contrast the Six Million Dollar Man has a rating of 7.1 with 12k+ votes...

They are both in the same ballpark of stupid, so does it really matter?

You will be dead long before reruns of the Barbie movie stop being shown to the next generation of brave independent women. More people have seen the original Blade Runner movie today than the Six Million Dollar Man or Fall Guy, so it stands to reason, long after you're dead, people will still...

Remembered for what, and by whom? It's not like there is a Nick at Night that is showing old TV shows that today's zoomers are lining up to watch. In no small part because they mostly watch TikTok/Twitch/Youtube. Even in the 2000s, were any of those reruns being played on TV? How do late...

Funny, I thought it was going to be some obscure reference that didn't show him or refer to him by name, but nope, actual screen time. I guess so much shit going on in the episode I didn't even notice it was him... and I even watched the episode a second time, yesterday.

I remember him dying in season 1, what I meant is that I didn't see anything referencing him in s02e01.

Wat? I didn't catch that.

In the short blip of that promo that I watched, they were referring to the voice in your head (from the thin blood) as a male ("he" this and "he" that) with a normal sounding name. I'm a bit doubtful that they are going to pay for 2 different voice actors to read all those lines in order to...

It sounds more like a CP2077 rip, in that the Elder Vampire, with a dumb fucking name, had a "spell" carved into them using the blood of a thin blood modern day vampire, while they were hibernating (torpor). This causes PHYRE to wake up and have the voice/soul of the thin blood talking to them...

Did it say how old that build actually was? I wonder if they just stopped pushing in house builds to the beta, at any point, or if all the NYI stuff was just fairly easy/quick development time requirements.

When was the last time you tried beta? Can't really judge it on what they had done a year+ ago. After watching both videos, it looks fairly polished; I didn't see any NYI placeholders or anything like that. He said most bugs he encountered were GFX related, but did have 1 time that a character...

Mort got an almost full release copy that includes everything but the final two chapters. Here are a couple videos: Overview of release VS. beta: Full character creation run through:

I would hope they meant that they have been playing BG3 Act 1 for years in EA, in order to steal as many ideas as they can to make it a good game...

Mort bit the bullet and watched the whole promo interview from WoD, so he could make a summery. He states (heavy CP2077 influences): You can chose gender and 1 out of 4 clans (with more clans as DLC). While they didn't expressly state you can customize anything, they did put up some art...