Search results

And probably also access to the means of violence.

I know you don't understand why because you're really stupid but that data, in literally no way, backs up the claim thatcauseof that violence is the race of the people committing it.

People that are actually mentally retarded have an excuse. What's yours?

See above where Tuco was talking about the correlation/causation problem. The reason that you're making that error is that you have a confirmation bias toward the racist conclusions you already hold.

It's not a metaphorical argument. What you are saying is stupid on its face. You seriously want me to believe North Dakota is less racist than New York? Fine. Go ahead and say that stupid shit. That is the point where I feel sufficiently superior to not give a fuck about this conversation...

I can't even begin to follow whatever insane logic you used to call that a correlation = causation. My argument was just that it's insane to claim that racially diverse populations aremoreracist than racially homogeneous populations and that that is clearly borne out by even a passing...

That might not have been what youmeantto say but that was the direct implication of what you did say.

1. It's not even really relevant to what I was saying (hence the "moreover"). 2. I'm not going to argue with idiots about the color of the sky.

No I'm not going to bother providing data to prove that North Dakota is more racist than New York. If you people are so fucking disconnected from reality that you need me to explain that the sky is blue, there's no point talking to you.

Here's how we got here: ?: Canada has lower violent crime rates dipshit A: That's because they don't have so many brown people (also the problem with racism is all the brown people making people racist and not the racists themselves) me: that's racist and you're retarded

umadbro?

They're not baseless you stupid dipshit. Go back and read what I said. I lay out very clearly what the basis is for calling those statements racist. What the fuck is wrong with you?

I love how totally disconnected from reality you get when you get angry. In what universe is it the case thatIwas the one to fail to provide argumentation for what I was saying? Seriously dude are you illiterate? Have you just not been reading anything except the words "racist" and "retard?"...

I'm saying you're either a racist or stupid because you can't grasp an obvious case of racism,no matter how clearly explained it is. That you have utterly retreated on addressing the direct and specific reasons I called his statements racist makes me lean toward you being too dumb for this...

Sorry hayseed, that's just an undeniable fact of reality.

I called him a racist because he was saying explicitly racist shit. The fact that you're too fucking stupid (or racist) to grasp it no matter how small I make my words doesn't make me a pussy. It makes you unfixably broken in your thinking organ.

Dude, diversity is not the cause of racism. That's fucking retarded. The least diverse areas of the U.S. are also the most racist. Moreover, theproblemof racism is the racists, not the people they hate. There's no way you can fail to grasp that without being a total moron or a complete...

lol I give up. You people are too fucking retarded.

I can't even believe how fucking stupid you are. The problem of racism and its legacy is THE FUCKING RACISM, not the diversity that triggered that racism in the minds of racists. Insisting otherwise (as you do, every single time you claim "diversity" is the problem) makes you a fucking racist...

Are you a moron? Did you miss the part where I explicitly said I'm against gun control. Thewholeof my "argument" (not that there's any real resistance here)ishis racist bullshit. Jesus fuck you guys are dumb.

Insinuating that those murders occurredbecauseof the blackness of those males makes you a racist. Not understanding that that's what you're insinuating makes you a fucking retard.

That means the drug war (not the immigration) is the problem you stupid fuck. Yes you fucking did you stupid bastard. Right fucking here: You fucking explicitly say that diversity is the problem and then act like that's even fucking remotely equivalent to racial discrimination being the...

Characterizing the drug war as a problem of immigration is fucking racist. Characterizing the legacy of racism as a problem of diversity is fucking racist. Seriously, are you out of your mind?

1. I'm not the one of us that's fucking retarded so your fucking retarded code words don't work on me. 2. Insinuating that the problem is the higher amount of brown people here is the height of racism, you fucking retard.

For me, this + shitty CGI of the trailer = failboat

He's not trolling you racist dipshit.

How Did This Get Made? Bad (and sometimes awesomely-bad) movie reviews with Paul Scheer, June Diane Raphael, Jason Mantzoukas, and guests. Pretty goddamn great. The shit that comes out of Mantzoukas' mouth just kills me. Typically runs between 45 minutes and an hour. The Pod F. Tompkast...

It's pretty much impossible to use nukes without infringing on the rights of others (just from the environmental damage alone).

Why would we do that?

Oh I think you're just crazy so nobody should bother listening to you.

Uh huh.

I think you're just stalling.

The question iswhether they should have tojust because someone else might murder someone with thattypeof weapon.

If you think access to guns should be constrained in any way, my point still holds.

I don't know, some stupid anti-gun shit. There's too many of you spewing too much irrational shit for me to keep straight your particular brand of nonsense.

Because you're just assuming your position and then acting like it's just obvious. To me, what's obvious is that you haven't really thought out your position. Prove me wrong, bro.

That's a copout.

I want things to be changed. Specifically I think it's too hard to get guns.

Just as a general matter of principle, it is always up to those who wish to impose on the liberties of others (however small the imposition, up to and including things with "no practical purpose" --not that that's actually true with guns--) to demonstrate the necessity of doing so.

That is not even remotely the way that the burden of justification goes.