Search results

When you need to hit a fucking stretch goal just to get simple things that qualify as expected content in a medieval rpg, that oft-cited advantage of crowdfunding "freeing us from the fetters of a publisher" begins to sound pretty useless.

Even EQ's pvp servers were distinguished by FFA/teams and loot rules. If these guys were really up to the task of "building something new, something that's never been done before" (as they claim to be doing), they'd have worked on defining uniform rules and mechanics adequate for pvp in a...

There won't be a good full-loot mmo until some developer wises up and moves beyond the standard "HP up and down until 0" combat model, the typical character power curve, item-centric progression, and the thoughtless conventions governing inventory capacity, item ownership, criminal law, player...

Open-world-sandbox-full-loot-territorial-siege-warfare-pvp-player-driven-economy-did-I-mention-sandbox-freedom-blah-blah-fucking-blah. Buzzwords carry no weight. And you're completely off the mark. If Koster were lead on this thing it'd at least have a chance; alas, he's just a consultant.

Lofty proclamations that have all been made before, and with nothing to back them up but an uninspired title, some generic, inoffensive concept art, and hints at systems that will undoubtedly be too rigid and simplistic to allow for anything but a parody of what they're promising. It won't be in...

This shart will be flushed in less than 6 months just like the first one, because it's under the same clueless management.

The reason they think no one's on is because theshard can't break 200 clientseven during primetime with triple-boxing allowed. This turd can only circle the bowl for so long before it finally gets flushed.

An "instanced" dungeon in UO... *vomits*

Richard Bartle's thoughts on this subject.