Search results

I can answer from my perspective (Using Eq2 as example) I zone into a Vesspyr Isle and need to get across the zone. I skip all the USELESS trash mobs that have zero chance to drop anything or serve any purpose whatsoever. If trash mobs had some value, then I could see the point, but why...

I understand that argument, I just did not understand the difference between portals, opening gates, etc vs. flying mounts in old zones when it comes to immersion and making the world relevant with old content.

What about 2 years down the line and having to re run grey zones to get somewhere? Would you agree flying mounts remove that headache?

I will concede that "Blink" is one of the best episodes...but they tend to use the weeping angels too many times later down the line. (Diminishing their coolness IMO)

EQNWire Op Ed: Will Monetizing Everything Leave Room for an In-Game Economy for EQNL? nice article about Landmark and using real money

Any chance for elaboration? Harder names? Difficult passageways? Less useless trash mobs? Throw us a bone!!!

I enjoyed the option of adding items to mounts as well as the things you mentioned.

" As for Clara, that was all explained in the Name of the Doctor. Dalek-Clara is one of the time-dispersed "echoes" of regular Clara. As an aside, I really dislike how Clara has ended up so important to the plot events of the Doctor's life. She sucks as a companion. " I agree about...

Archer promotes its fifth season by posting nude pictures on Reddit The A.V. Club

Very sorry to Necro this thread...but Well done sir!

Playing Eq2 since launch I agree about Kunark. (My favorite expac) Being biased, I enjoy Eq2 combat system...although it can be cluttered at times and confusing. I think the HO system was a good idea in principal, but never really worked well.

Fixed number, but with a range of possibilities. (Skill comes in the setup and execution)

Is there a target demographic this game is looking at? 25-45 age 15-25 hours playtime per week? etc?

Obviously Mr. Mcquaid wants opinions. That being said, I don't envy you going through them all for the next 3 years.

Single source rumor I trust, but cannot get secondary confirm....so reliability is an issue. (Sorry about that)

Not sure if the conversation would be better, but it does create a central place thus helps building momentum. (Of course, I could be wrong about that)

Not to keep bringing up "Star Citizen" again... They are doing ALOT of things right (At least website, communication and money raising wise) I like the idea of listening to the investors first (the people that spend money this early in a game are the ones that will tend to stick with it 10...

Sounds like you have a sound "Business" plan created. The feedback on many websites is encouraging. Let's get rocking!

Housing plots, or special mounts... I would pay $100 for an Elephant.

The current rumor around the campfire is look for Jan 27 ish alpha...with more info coming this week. (Take it for what its worth)

That makes sense. I guess the only reason I bring it up is that there are only a few "big names" in MMO development, and I wonder what Brads will be worth...I guess we shall see.

You don't think Star Citizen changed the game? (36 million and counting on basically reputation of its creator) Edit: meaning, it is possible now to raise millions + based on "name" and "reputation"...no longer needing large investors.

I am betting if they had gone Kickstarter from the beginning..assuming they had that option...Copernicus could have raised "Star Citizen" kind of money.

Interesting point... they seemed to be a year late on that. If you went back before the RI investment.. I wonder how much they could have raised?

Assuming the subtitle will drop off later after launch? (Very much like Vanguard: Saga of Heroes became just Vanguard)