Search results

Are the songs shorter? I wonder if no lap dance was ever given to Hey Jude, that would have sucked for the stripper.

I think so, didn't they did it already?

The actual threat is the proof of the intent. No one can read anyone's mind, so we have to go by their actions. When a person is threatening you, he is communicating his intent to hurt you. What more proof do you want? That he actually hurts you? A threat and the actualization of the threat...

Why isn't rwby bought out by a full studio? I love the comedy of the writing and the action scenes. Food fight!!!

Because she is hot? She looks very cute in those pics.

I just want more pics of Jamie.

tanoo, you can't threat without intent. Just look at the definition the word threat.. it means intention. Do you want several dictionary definitions?

You are an insufferable cunt. First of all, to hold someone hostage, you have to have the intent of something, if not then u can not hold them hostage, they just walk away. Do you know what intent means right, it doesn't mean the actualization of something, just the intended action. Holding...

Are we on level six Cad?

BTW, if a conviction is overturned, is not an example of the system working. It is an example of the system failing, when an innocent man, or a man who you failed to give a fair change at trial, gets sentenced. The purpose of the system is not to overturn convictions, but to sent criminals to...

Darrell Williams - National Registry of Exonerations Black man fingers white woman. Only evidence was their drunken word, guys gets sentenced. Later conviction is overturned. Headshot. Now move those post away sir.

So let's see, u want a case, that a man was found guilty, solely on the word of the female, and then that conviction got overturned? Or must it have alcohol involved?

Can u post more pics of jamie? Thank u

Question, what are the conditions for the case? I don't want to go and find one and then have the goal post shifted. Be very specific. Here is oneInnocence Blog: Chicago Man's Rape Conviction Overturned After 30 Years

Note the part where they define reasonable judgement as "In order to give legal consent, a person must be able to exercise reasonable judgment. In other words, the person must be able to understand and weigh the physical nature of the act, its moral character, and probable consequences. " Been...

Are you talking about Moral rape. OMG feelings!!!!! Still waiting for that statue regarding reasonable judgement

The statute says incapable of resisting, not incapable of reasonable judgement. Don't put it to me in any way. Put it in plain English as written in the law. tell me more about the reasonable judgement statute.

Cute. So Instead of linking the actual statue for reasonable judgement, you link the da association handbook on how to proceed with rape. Except that Your own handbook disagrees with you. The person never resisted and like the guy said has was a willing participant. So how was she unable to...

You are the prosecutor for california. Do a control f for reasonable judgment on the rape statute, please. Don't use air quotes when there is nothing to quote, nor use them like humpty dumpty.

It is my hypothetical, not yours, do you understand how hypothetical works? You are supposed to ask me questions and beat my argument within my hypothetical, not create a hypothetical of yours and argue that. That is what a strawman is btw. If you want to lay out a hypothetical scenario go...

The guy replies, "what she was that drunk, no way man, she seemed just tipsy. Also she didn't resisted anything, in fact she was on top most of the time. She didn't passed out, we just had sex." So how do you show that he should have known her level of intoxication? Let me help you out. On...

Now u are just farming negs. Arbitrary take it away.

imagine u are the California DA, will u charge the man and if u do provide which section of the statute u will apply. Number and letter please. Anyone else can join btw.

Suing here is your quote (a) Rape is an act of sexual intercourse accomplished with a person not the spouse of the perpetrator, under any of the following circumstances: - See more at:CAL. PEN. CODE 261 : California Code - Section 261

Please insufferable cunt, do a control f for the word rational. CAL. PEN. CODE 261 : California Code - Section 261 You keep thinking words exists, in the law, when they dont.

There is no evidence of rape. There is a reasonable standard that must be meet prior to an arrest been made. On this case there is no evidence, only allegations, for any jurisdiction in the US, that is not enough for an arrest. For all you know she could have consented, as her own statement...

So Tarrant ?tuco?

U r a cunt because even when we quote u when u admit been wrong, u reply with with "guy I was only wrong for x days". Or worse, point to the difference and say u were right after changing up opinion. Let's test you. A woman goes to the police, and claims the following. I went out with my girls...

The case law u linked did not find the guy guilty because the minor was intoxicated. It found the guy guilty because the minor was a minor, hence rendering consent moot.

Actually yes, all sex within minors is statutory rape under a certain age. From Florida law. 1.An offender less than 18 years of age who commits lewd or lascivious molestation against a victim less than 12 years of age; Pick a state bitch, and lets discuss it state by state.

Where tanoomba, where? you keep saying this like it was truth.. Where, show me a case non involving a minor where consent given under intoxication was render null by the court. Please link us again that case that got overturned in appeals.

Did you just switched from: "i was wrong", to "i was only wrong for x days"? And then you complain about moving the goal post. Oh the irony1!!!11eleven

/start Minors CANT give consent, regardless of intoxication levels. You cant apply intoxication law with minors. Minors cant give consent, hence any law that uses the word consent do not apply to them. /end Repeat until understood.

Consent. When I asked to bring an actual case about a NON minor, you were unable to find a case and ended up saying, and I quote. "well, laws apply to minor don't they" Which signaled how much of a retard statement that was.

The problem why we think is bullshit your argument, is because there has been evidence, arbitrary linked it, of it failing miserably, the kid with the botched penis. And also the empirical evidence and results done in 22 studies that showed a clear difference in high level cognitive functions...

Just ask tanootard what a sexual taste is. Just ask him, it is inception levels of trolling.

Remember there are no poor white people, ever.

It is the retard brigade, what can u do.