Search results

He puts my gaydar at like 110%, and I'm a fucking gaydar sniper. I don't even need to google that shit to know he aint married (if he is, its fake).

Except... The choice of the people in these examples was to not do the work. I think you are the alien, sir.

What fun is slapping your cock against the meat patty when they'd probably like it.

I'll tell you my stance on gun control for your amusement or non-amusement. It is not entirely libertarian. I believe guns should be legal to have and carry almost anywhere. The only places they should be illegal are places where all people have been thoroughly checked to not have them for good...

So why not stand with that view. You need some asterisks with your current stance.

You're right, I think it should be perfectly legal to hate fags or any other group. I can not and will not support a law that compels obedience in the people. My line is clear and in the sand. Yours is blurry, and the SJW is starting to creep into your blood. Just like I think all things SJW...

So the KKK walks in to a family friendly restaurant. They then proceed to hold a rally there. Does the owner have the power to deny service? I would say yes, you would say no?

I honestly haven't read anything siddar has said, or anyone's responses to him, so I can't comment on them. Where exactly have you objectively proven anything I've said wrong? All my arguments in this thread have been subjective and moral, is it even possible to prove them one way or the other...

If you set up a system where work is required of them, they would be. It'll be interesting to see how this concept begins to apply to the internet over time. The SJWs are watching, and they will come after your websites and games. Game is released without their definition of equal...

I'm not supporting an idea that forces people to work, its just that they have to work or they're breaking the law, and they need to learn to deal with that. This is literally you're argument. I don't think a slave master in the south could of put it any better.

So what happens if they say no and don't work? Oh wait, they can't.

A definition of slavery:the subjection of a person to another person, esp in being forced into work You see to remove a person's right to say no to work. I'm okay with doctors being slaves in emergency rooms, but only because of the greater benefit to society. What greater benefit to society...

hodj logic

Procedural. The supreme court very rarely hears cases, even ones with merit, until there is a split in federal courts.

You realize that has to do with the state not being allowed to limit people's freedoms. There's not one letter in there about people compelling other people to do things. You telling people what to do is not your freedom, infact, its actually slavery in its purest form.

What's the federal statute for artists must make whatever art a gay compels them to.

But I'm not for these things? Lol. Like I said earlier, I am only for SOME of the parts of the civil rights act. Essentially, I support the parts that ended governmental discrimination.

A cake maker is told by a couple they want a gay cake. They are given one choice at gun point, to say yes. Is this a choice, is this freedom? No it isn't.

You know this is exactly the viewpoint I'm arguing from? I'm 95% libertarian. I only support the need of government to support major undertaking for society that individuals, groups or businesses are unwilling to do. Hence, I am okay with the military, the socialized health system we have, but I...

Lets just go back to slavery. At least they knew their service was compelled.

ur an idiot. Just because siddar is an idiot too doesn't make you right.

Right to free speech? I agree with you on some stuff, but ur wrong here. There are tons of positive rights. Freedom cant exist without your positive ability to experience it.

A bunch of people agree this is essentially an entirely different situation. You have the right to live- you don't have a right to receive the cakes you want. By repeating this over and over, do you think you'll convince people that the right to live and the right to have a cake are somehow...

pretty much spot on.

It's interesting to see the breakup of who supports what in this thread. It's a lot different than most threads. This is also a a really stupid argument. As I said earlier, I am more than willing to elaborate greatly on the concepts where government should decide morality- when freedoms overlap...

Declining service isn't an action, it's a refusal to take action. The difference is huge and distinct. In essence, you support the government compelling a person to take action- perhaps even compelling to commit to speech they may not agree with. A cake maker could be COMPELLED to make a cake...

Correct, but one is perpetrated by the individual, which has greater freedom to do things under the constitution. The other is done by the government, which does not and should not have that freedom to discriminate at will. You aren't stopping them from doing stuff, you are compelling them to do...

I am very simply for free speech, even hate speech. I do not support laws of any type which allow free speech only when you agree with it. Only the government should be compelled not to hate. It's the same sort of thoughts which are leading to these stupid anti-rape zone college rules through...

What makes the freedom to express yourself as gay greater than the freedom to express your hatred for gays? One form of discrimination is not better than the other. Just because I agree more with the first expression does not make it more morally correct than the second one. Protecting hateful...

That's a huge block of text to completely ignore my argument. I'll return the favor.

I think I fairly well layed out why you are wrong in that post hodj. I'd like to see your argument against that method of thinking. I think the civil rights act was okay in some regards specifically because it was the government itself that discriminated against blacks. I am all for removing...

For urf.... AP shen ftw. Can literally 1v5 with that bullshit.

Yea, sounds like they're setting up to shit the bed for a year when romo's gone. It's a reasonable decision.

There's a lot of shit that needs to be eliminated before we even start to seriously consider aliens. Either way, these signals is intriguingly weird. It's more likely that this will fit into helping explain other observable phenomenon.

I believe the government is mediator between when personal rights overlap. It's a subject I can elaborate on greatly if you are truly interested. It's interesting you bring up the republic. It's been a long ass time since I read it- but my memory should be fresh enough to argue about it with...

So you are against the concept of personal responsibility? Glad to see you are for a nanny state. Well lets just slash off the first fucking amendment, who needs the bullshit freedom it comes with anyways. Yes, people will do terrible things to it, but let society fix that- it's not the...

again, WHY does this need to happen.

So many people in this thread think they are taking the high road by being against this law. This law is simple and effective in its scope, it prevents the government from doing things. WHY IS THIS BAD? Yes it COULD be used to allow discrimination against gays, or furries, or gay furries, or...

im not the least bit excited about this, even though I feel I should be. Why is that rerolled?

telling me that I have to love people or else is the greatest hate crime of all.