Search results

still better than cowboys playcalling. You ready for some fucking 1st down running bitches.

cowboys have to have some of the most retarded playcalling ive seen in the history of mankind. run the fucking ball every god damn play no matter what unless you want to throw it outside to run it from there. Holy fuck i want to shit on garrets lawn.

First one was because there was no real contract. Second was prolly cause ball was overthrown. Thats definitely some sloppy as shit corner play. A good receiver would of abused that.

fake fg incoming

LET WEEDEN THROW THE BALL YOU USELESS PIECE OF SHIT COWBOYS COACHES. FUCKING SHIT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!

Will his kid be one of the retards who got too many concussions?

What, people agreeing with me in the science thread? Tell lumie its time.

Original sensitivity I read was calculated at 1 event/ year, and at some point it was upgraded to what you said (10 events per year). I never checked the exact numbers myself though. There's also a high variation in the sensitivity of the machine due to numerous factor in how ideal the...

I'll agree as far as this. Gravity waves aren't completely excluded yet. They are simply to the level of 'unlikely' to be detected. Mathematically, the certainty is about 99% that waves should have been detected, but to exclude them reasonably, certainty must reach ~2x10^-7 that the results are...

cause gravity waves and QE is ALL OF SCIENCE!!!!

Why should I care about or try to explain this? Some parts are observationally true, yet this one appears to likely be observationally false. It would mean the theory is observationally broken, but I'm not here to do anything other than say that part of the theory appears to be observationally...

The funny thing is, There literally is no examples of anything except gravity being 100% instantaneous action in observed science. It is always calculated in applied math as instantaneous action. The existence of gravity waves is a huge mathematical mess where gravity is allowed to act...

That's the majority of my position. I believe that gravity waves are a neat idea until they are proven to exist. I won't accept indirect evidence, especially when its indirect evidence from HYPOTHESIZED SYSTEMS, because indirect evidence like that is not trustworthy scientifically for numerous...

Correct, they are. That's why they did calculations to estimate how often we should we be detecting them. Do you think these calculations were wrong when they predicted how often we should detect something with current and historical detection capabilities? I already covered that detection isn't...

I'm not saying GR is wrong, many parts of it appear to be very true and have been quite experimentally verified enough that doubting them is wrong. That's really just an attempt at deflection. I am talking about and only about gravity waves specifically in this situation. What other...

The only reason the machines wouldn't work is either A: the theory is wrong, or B: No natural events that are detectable have occurred. Do you have an alternative explanation? Almost every scientist agrees the machine should work according to theory. So do you think they just fucked up? What...

Gravity wave events have different intensities, and different directions of propagation. We've increased the number of facilities to eliminate the directional part of the problem. That mostly leaves the intensity part of the equation. We're at a point where we should randomly be detecting events...

Me a raccoon? No thanks. predators or get out. Also, you seem to be omitting the part where machines that read these signals like already exist man.

lol

I don't believe in theories that haven't been rigorously observationally verified/tested. I know some people like to get on the band wagon and say GRAVITY WAVES ARE REAL!!! just because some guy got slapped a nobel prize on his desk for observing some pulsars and then writing a formula that...

Thats pretty much standard mustelid behavior. Weasels martens ect almost all basically go rape frenzy on everything. Infact, some species have even evolved the point that females that are raped quickly after being born can keep that gift around until they're old enough to use it. No really...

Quantum mechanics requires FTL action to work. That's the main reason einstein thought the theory didn't accurately represent reality. Sure it works as a mathematical model, but its wise to question that anything FTL is happening until we actually detect and observe FTL actions. It's also why...

I haven't bothered to correct people who think I'm using theory wrong when I talk about mathematical constructs because its not worth the effort. I agree not many actual scientists think these things translate to the real world, but people on these forums fall for the traps of believing math...

"There's absolutely no evidence to back my claim up, but it is completely true until you manage to disprove it." - People who believe in god and hodj

Thats what you think shitlord. They just are smart enough to leave no survivors.

hodj logic is more like. There's no proof of X... But I agree with X, thus CITATION REQUIRED.

lol wut. Does that mean hodj thinks god is true until the burdeon of proof to disprove him is met? I just don't even. Perhaps hes gone wacky insane since I last tried to talk to him.

I ignored hodj forever ago tuco. He's got a terminal case of verbal diarrhea. He links a bunch of shit he doesn't even understand then argues against positions that people don't even have. Talking with him is as pointless as talking to wall. People like khalid at least put a bit of honesty...

All the negatives in those are relative, not absolute.

Show me where anything I just said is shown to exist in reality. One tiny small example will do. Even one. Cmon, do it.

plenty of theories say they exist, and I think they're bullshit.

You obviously don't have the slightest understand of what im talking about. Again, I'm not talking about negative numbers, I'm talking about absolute negatives which aren't based off frames of reference. Concepts that fall into this void are things like negative mass and negative volume.

My rant was against negative -RESULTS- being irrational, if they can't be calculated with a frame of reference that makes them positive. Not even QE falls to this standard. Of course, people here heard negative numbers and assumed I hate all negatives, which is not true. The main culprits of...

Whats that got to do with QM?

QM is mostly fine with me. My problems are mostly with QE, and a couple various fringe theories. QM, especially the parts used in particle physics/QFT is fine with me. This is also the part of QM that was developed before QM even existed. It was only later added to the theory. Troll likes to say...

A few of the very early ones and #16 are pretty easy to score points on. The list for the most part is very fair though. I guess the -5 points to start is there to acknowledge the fact that some points will happen.

The cowboys loss is 100% ont he coaching to me. They want to get by playing conservatively instead of trusting what they have. Weeden is playing pretty damn good, they NEEEED to trust him. They tried to just burn the clock up for a win, and that doesn't work against very offensive oriented...

Read that list and found you guys tend to score higher than me when we argue. I make a few points, but the list is poisoned in a way that makes it almost impossible not to score some points via interpretation when you talk about anything related to science.

weeden looks fine. Dallas will be okay if they believe in him. The fact that they stuck to their plan and made 0 adjustments at the half shows me they don't fucking believe in him. rip cowboys.

The astros play this game was ugly. They knock out one of their own best players with a flying punch to the face and then on top of it decide to challenge the call at pete carrol levels of derp. They really look cooked at the moment.