Search results

Okay. But can you explain why he lives Rent free in that guys head?

No, but seriously who is Keg. Did i guess right? Can't stunlock Naggy with one enchanter anymore. RIP Dandin

Who's Keg? Is that Kegadin? You seem like you're stalking this guy. Like really fucking salty just repeatedly posting screencaps of his /who. When's not relevant to anything that's being discussed? How did he hurt you? But LOL if you think i'm Kegadin. Cupie, Bobby and basically any of the...

yall people are really fucking insecure lol

Yes and i've played an SK with TL on Ragefire and topped parses doing so... SKs don't do DPS they do burst when they have a full mana bar, Unholy and HT. It's not until you get Mental Corruption and start stacking FT that you can sustain DPS that's higher then a warriors. Side note: The...

Warriors get Crit, Duel wield, higher skill caps and sometimes better weapon ratios SKs get better discs and a mana bar. You need a lot of FT from gear, AAs and Buffs before it's starts to out preform the skill cap difference on a sustained basis. Warrior does more sustained DPS in basically all...

Sounds like User error. Midwits can't handle the fact every time a ranger swings his sword his bank account goes up IRL

Logical proof SKs are peasants, Rangers are Krono Lords. Peasant = Poor Krono Lord = Rich More Krono = Rich Less Krono = Poor Loot = Krono DPS = Loot More DPS = More Loot Ranger DPS > SK DPS Therefor Ranger = Krono Lord SK = Peasant

It's possible but the first time i went down their on Phinny Young "Stunner" Aka Authority was corner tanking it on his enchanter and King wasn't casting. You can have agro and be LoS and it won't cast, just like the pillars in Tranix Room.

They can definitely faceroll it in SoV. But there is just no place you can tank him w/o adds. I'd be willing to put 5kr on it being impossible for you to kill king. Queen maybe with a Full mana bar and unholy. King nah just nah.

You can corner tank it similar to how people used to exploit Naggy to prevent him from AoEing. King wont even cast his 3k Nukes if you do it correctly.

You can't kill King/Queen with SK/Shaman in Kunark. Although in fairness you can't really kill King/Queen with Enchanter/Cleric without cheating past the door ATM. You can LoS the AoE by tanking them on the corner.

Can confirm the reason i quit Enchanter on Phinny and will never main the Class on TLPs again is because it's too weak. It's sad too cause they're one of the most enjoyable classes to play. Chanters just blow massive chunks in 95% of zones once you hit SoV. Sure you're strong in Velks/Kael, but...

It's called a joke retard

Half the "women" that play EQ are dudes

On TLP you charm Basilisk unless you want all the monks to hate you.

Pickzones really hurt Druid Charm a lot. It doesn't matter as much that Druid charm destroys in Tactics when people spend all their time in Plane of Fire

Nah In even now in Classic WoW you can't hit 60 by just questing and doing dungeon/group quests. Even with all the quests that were added with AQ/Naxx/DM ect it's actually impossible you simply have to grind there isn't anyway around it. Blizzard changed it with TBC launch they buffed quest XP...

Am i wrong? WoW literally just copied those other games and did a worse job because they didn't have as many "gather 8 buckets of Berries" quests. Later on Blizzard started adding some more unique quests like the bombing quest in Hellfire or how the Lore is deeply woven with cut scenes in...

Which is how EQ2 was also. The only difference was in WoW you didn't have enough quests to do. In those other games you did.

IMO it changes based on era. Would say Classic-Kunark Monk SoV-SoL SK PoP and beyond Ranger is so much fun.

EQ2 launched before WoW and had a better working quest system on launch. So did DAoC. So did FFXI Online. WoW had a dogshit quest system compared to those games when it launched, questing was the primary way to level in Classic WoW and even with 13 patches in Classic adding hundreds of quests...

My comment wasn't directed at anyone. I would definitely agree that Blizzard had a much better reputation then SoE at the time and for good reason. But EQ2 launched the same month and honestly for the first 6 months or so EQ2 was the better game. But Blizzard did a much better job and...

I feel like anyone saying "WoW was good/clean/polished on launch" didn't actually play WoW on launch. The game was a pile of shit on launch.

Bruh as a tank you spend like 40 seconds an hour bash stunned. That's like 16 mins per day of /played time. That's like a full hour of being bash stunned ever 4 days of /played. That's like being bash stunned for a full day for ever 96 days /played. Just think about that in the character...

I'd agree when you're talking about most classes, but Tanks that can be Ogres should be Ogres and Necros should be Iksars. Not dying cause you forgot to click of Lich when you went to take a piss is just too fucking OP.

You wanna here some really dumb stuff join Ranger chat a week into Luclin.

So you're telling me you're gonna Lava Storm and do 1200 damage to the 1200 hp total froglok you're fighting? Nobody else is gonna do any damage in the time it takes to cast a rain and have 3 waves come out? Yeah nah bro you clearly just don't wanna admit you're wrong.

What undead in Classic are you getting to Frost Storm? Like besides the Ghoul Lord and his guards which undead lives long enough for Frost Storm to be viable? The Hole undead? What about the first 40 levels? What nuke are you using in UR and LGUK pre 41 that's better? Oh that's right there...

Let's say you're a 35 Wizard at EXE in Guk your most mana efficient nuke is Ice Shock at 3.6 Damage per mana with a -10 MR check. Let's say you're a 35 Cleric at EXE in Guk your most mana efficient nuke is Expel undead at 3.6 Damage per mana -50 MR check. If you're really sweaty you can also...

Undead nukes are more mana efficient the Wizard Nukes. Clerics are actually just better DPS then Rogues, Monks, Wizards when you're killing undead.

I'm gonna play both. It's actually perfect timing hit 50 in EQ then fuck off to WoW for 3 months till i run out of shit to do. Come back to EQ just in time to avoid doing Classic and Kunark for the 8th time.

I understand how it works though. The problem is you can't actually figure out the exact value Avoidance is gonna give because it changes depending on the mobs Accuracy and we don't have that number available to us. On top of that it has diminishing returns because you can't avoid a hit that...

So you're incapable or unwilling to learn for yourself on the matter. Yet you feel the need to lecture me and others on a subject you don't know about.

I agree they should all listen to the "super autists" that said something on some forum somewhere that you can't remember.

Those "Super autists" were and are wrong. There is also no way to effectively Parse it because Avoidance AC is a versus stat. +6 Avoidance AC vs a level 2 Skelly that has 21 Accuracy is gonna be multiple % chance to hit in change. +6 Avoidance vs a 80 raid boss with 1500 accuracy is gonna do...

Ogre War with AGI start vs Ogre War with default starting stats The second AC number determines how often you get hit

Bruh AGI is a great stat for tanks. AGI = Avoidance AC. You can literally open your stat sheet now and see what it does. That said it's pretty fucking useless if your a rogue/wiz DPSing on a raid and you're an annoying little cunt if you send Shaman tell asking for AGI in Classic.

Crazy how over the course of 10+tlps, 20+ expansions and hundreds of patches things about the game change and what was "Basic Knowledge" becomes outdated knowledge.

A Ranger can tank efficiently enough to the point where you're never gonna need med breaks or need to worry about bad pulls. The Bard/healer/Ranger 3x melee DPS group is better then the Bard/Healer/Warrior +3 melee DPS group. The Ranger group does all the same content just faster. Anguish Aug...