Search results

Then find evidence of a better equation or a better rolling resistance coefficient. Also from a quick google it looks like we're not far off: http://books.google.com/books?id=XMp...icient&f=false

Have you seen what GTAIV looks like on PC? It's one of the top 5 best looking games ever along with Crysis and skyrim. And yeah, not ported to PCs = console exclusive to me. Sorry for the confusion. I might buy a console this generation though if mouse/kb support is in.

You might be right but my jimmies are still rustled over red dead redemption, demon souls and god of war. Only one of those is owned by sony or MS!

that's not winter! That's more like an early frost.

Maybe not for IPs owned by sony/ms, but I look at it like this: $xboxToPcPortProfit = netGainFromPCsales - costToPort - MSExclusiveSubsidy If costToPort decreases ports will be more profitable and more likely to happen or require more subsidy from MS. But maybe I'm simplifying it too much.

b0nafide exists outside of time. I could give a shit about backwards compatibility. Anything that merges PC and console architecture is good even if it limits backward compatibility. I wonder what all three platforms using x86 architecture means for ease of console ports. And if it's...

You guys are rationalizing it too much. Just accept that the comic book has retroactive power creep.

I think in our scenario it's best to assume that either: 1. The plane is artificially held in place until the treadmill and the propeller are running at fullspeed. 2. While the plane is moving forward relative to ground the treadmill will continue to accelerate up to 470mph. In either of...

Ancient it's fucked if the treadmill is rolling back at around 470 (It'd likely be less than that because the rolling resistance would increase as the plane moved forward, so it'd be in at equilibrium somewhere between 0 and takeoff speed). Where that number is exactly because of the decrease in...

fucking conversions. You've won this round you observant bastard.

oh fuck the boeing, let's keep with the cessna. Bottom line is that his .01 wheel going 470mph = .2 is wrong. I don't know he got .2 using c = 0.005 + 1/40 (0.01 + 0.0095(v/100)^2) where v = 756kph

Of course it diminishes. I just want to know what speed the thing would have to go before it couldn't take off. OB's statement is that it's around 450mph but he thinks the treadmill is made out of sand and is covered in hair.

Show us the graph and intersection bro.

gavinlol

Your arguments are unfounded and your mathematical fortitude is inexact! pussy!

I think significant height = high enough for both objects to achieve terminal velocity. And you'd only have a marginal difference in terminal velocity if the difference in mass (with dimensions being equal) was marginal.

I can deny that also. When a_skeleton_03 checked out he explicitly said why to me and it matches what he's saying now.

Questions are all well and good, but I don't hold it against a man if his friend asks him for help and he sets up a donation without knowing all the details of what his friend is going through. That is, of course, assuming that he received no benefit from the donation and did not know the...

Google voice sucks for me. But whenever I play back the audio recording I can say with certaintity that the speaker did in fact say what google voice transcribed even if they didn't mean to say it. Ex: "Yeah, James, This is David doing and I'm just calling to let you know that. Phillippo...

Is there no insult I can use that will cause you to admit what ridiculous speed you'd need to overcome the engine thrust?

Everyone else pretty much covered what's wrong with what you said but I'll throw my hat into the pile saying you're out of line here.

Haha bitch. I defeated you with the power of math. The answer to the treadmill problem is: "Fuck you the airplane is taking off." Yep.

\Hey if classical mechanics problems bore you, I'm sure some real 'science' discussion like the latest science motivational speech or faux-science news about negative temperature or whatever will come soon.

Someday. And I feel like every failed product brings us closer!

Looks great, I love sandbox games.

Give us a number bro.

well how fast did you have to throw the snowball? I'm no expert but it seems like in most cases some of it would sublimate and some would melt.

Oh come on, be a sport. Run the numbers and let me know how many times more the speed would need to be than what the tires would take before they explode into misunderstood balls of flame.

tldr: Months ago ravvenn announced being engaged to Enigmatic Paradigm. In this thread Ravvenn talks about her alleged brother being a psycho mooch. Gets advice to gtfo. She claims to have gtfo. Later a few posters expose the engagement to EP being a joke. Someone brings up the money she got...

hey at least Stevelys gave us back all our monutz money.

Let us know what the mph would be with a rolling resistance coefficient of 0.01 would be (which is good estimation of a typical light aircraft).

It's good but the GTAIV one is much better because it's high resolution and doesn't hide low resolution textures behind a bunch of blurry bullshit.

You guys get way too worked up over women on this forum. Whether it's $500 from Blazin or a_skeleton_03 leaving the community (and coming back with a fresh pile of hate).

PM from OB: Bro I'm not trolling, I actually wanted to know how fast the treadmill would have to go. I question your assumption of the rolling resistance of the wheels being .204. I would bet it's closer to .02. Are you confusing the friction coefficient with rolling resistance? Because this...

Yeah I just imagined this fight being similar to the one between the 3rd and the 1st/2nd. Instead it's on par with Naruto's current fight.

hahahaa It might take off if you put the helicopter on casters

Fitch is taking the cut.... hard.

Give me a number bro.

Yes.

Ah so if only the treadmill was going 100mph it would overcome the amount of thrust of the propeller by providing enough friction on the wheels to accelerate.