Search results

I had eagles syndrome. It's a calcified ligament. There are numerous reasons that ligaments can calcify which all aren't understood, and its not fully understood why it leans to pain in some people.

This forum is probably full of lazy mooching manchildren, which should be the core audience of sanders outside of feminism majors. The fact that he can't even win here should be pretty fucking telling.

Game's alright, but bring your fucking poopsock sweaty grind all week chair. UI has turbo AIDS and they've made a lot of super shitty rule decisions which make the game unfun to play with friends.

Pro tip. Double click, hit cloak, then hit mwd. You can activate stuff after cloak and it will still work as long as you do it in a timely fashion, without the penalties of those things going into effect before the cloak does. If you got locked and shot down, it's because you were too damn slow...

This is not a spoiler of any sort. It's in the original movie. Tarkin asks vader if he's sure the homing beacon is secure, because its an awful risk to release leia with the plans.

Umm, I disagree.

I wont lie, I use the same torch for plumbing and creme brulee. It's a very slightly higher investment to start, but its a far better tool in general, because they generally have a more intense heat and bigger flame, and that's the whole point of using a damn torch.

A big point to make about the technology, is that LIGO has far greater potential if built in space. Most of the claims about the extreme things that it could do are many, many decades in the future, and probably will require multiple spread out space-built facilities to accomplish even then.

Parts of quantum mechanic would argue that our perception is an important part of the working of the universe (Shrodinger's cat). I tend to agree with you, myself. I don't think the universe gives a fuck.

State specifically what you mean by charge so I may specifically explain how you are wrong.

Where the reference point is arbitrary, negatives can exist in nature. Where the reference is non-arbitrary, negatives do not exist in nature. You understand exactly!

There are some offshoots of QM that are based on believing absolute negatives could be real. I consider those specific fields to be complete bunk, yes. I never made the claim that this encompasses ALL of QM.

The positive an negative refers to an angular direction in this case. It's essentially (putting it simply) A form of velocity, which I already exemplified as something with human reference.

You all flailed around when I made my claim about negative numbers, but not one person would able to provide an example of where I was wrong when challenged. I said that negative numbers don't exist in reality, and results where we can't change the frame of reference to make the results positive...

How the hell did this thread turn into a bunch of people arguing against me and general relativity? I'm literally defending this from a clown crew that has no idea how the theory works.

Oh, youthinkits wrong without actually knowing or checking? Clearly, it must be wrong.

What a big fucking pile of nonsense. First of all, equating electromagnetism to gravity is silly, since they work fundamentally different, and there are numerous reasons behind those differences. The biggest, and most apparent differences that you have no grasp of are these: Gravitational...

That's the field that acts instantly im talking about right there. See the field part, where I was talking about fields. See the field part of that wikipedia link. Why don't you read up on what fields are, and how they are represented mathematically in relativity. They act instantly, because you...

Not my fault you don't understand the math at all. There is no mechanism of delay in the fields themselves in the equations of relativity. The thing limited by the speed of light is the propagation of CHANGES to the field.

Again, where was I wrong about the science? I'm sorry that you find it inconvenient that I am skeptical of theories that aren't observationally proven, but my skepticism was never linked to my utterly and completely accurate representation of the scientific facts surrounding this event. It is...

Read my posts. I said the experiment in this subject is sound, I also said it hadn't yet excluded the possibility of a result. My skepticism aside, the objective facts I provided were all true.

There are still parts to relativity. One theory can't be simply accepted when another theory is proven because it is similar and in some way connected. Each part of the theory must be scientifically verified. The entire existence of this experiment is counter to your logic and explanation. Why...

The effect of gravity still occurs at infinite speed in relativity, the only thing limited by the speed of light is essentially the propagation of changes in the field. Gravity itself being entirely limited by the speed of light is absurd and doesn't work at all on even the most basic scientific...

I accept science for what it is. I claimed before this was not proven, which was true. Now that there is some observational evidence, I will consider it likely. As with all new theories posted here, I will wait till the experiment is reproduced and verified at another site, to eliminate possible...

That hit on cam's side when he ran early on pretty obviously effected him the rest of the game. Anywho. I was saying it earlier in the year, I was thinking it before this game, and it's even more true after the game: dat defense.

Why do people always assume money = intelligence. This guy is a modern ramsay bolton. He's just a terrible human being born into a great situation.

Clearly these are lies. I can see mosquitos all over the fucking place. Why aren't they eaten?

In south america, you just drink juice everything. I barely touched water in my time there. They got tropical fruits growing like weeds everywhere, so they might as well use them.

No, nothing eats mosquitos. God literaly put them here to punish us for multiculturalism.

If you think general relativity is one combined theory, u the dums. It's more than one theory. Yes, a part of it is extremely well tested, spefically the relation between the force of gravity and our perception of time. There are other parts which are nigh on unverified. This has shit all to...

The problem with relying wholy on observational science and only observational science to write laws of physics is that you can not fully understand the workings of a system that you can not fully see. I understand that you generally think this isclose enoughand thebest we can do, which is most...

This happened to be one of the first and earliest tests of the big bang theory. The big bang theory originally predicted a perfectly even and much more intense background radiation. The steady state theory predicted a cosmic background -exactly- as it was. For some reason, people still use this...

The big bang theory was literally made by a priest because it was like the bible. They then changed it a bunch until it matched previously observed data close enough to justify that it could be true. Its terrible science thats popular becausejesus

Physics itself has changed its fundamental rules past the point where those fundamental rules needed to be different for the big bang. It's basically the scientific way of saying neener neener cant prove me wrong, and also means that it won't lead to new understanding of anything. Particle...

About as reasonable as you can be on the subject. The big bang theory just benefits from being one of those few theories where the bible is held up by a tiny modicum of alternatively explainable science. The only reason it has held up so long is because the science needed to disprove it is...