Search results

The who and why no longer matters. The people have spoken, and once again, have made the right decision. I love the smell of democracy in the morning. My first post was agreeing with your post.

Official DS4 support as in just plug and play bluetooth?

God dammit!

https://www.firesofheaven.org/attachments/giphy-gif.5284/

I bought a big sack of those Buffalo Totino's based on McCheese's recommendation. They were pretty good.

I don't mind raw onions on things, but I don't like onions on my pizza, in general.

Find a 14 tile project.

Camp?! This is going to be the best summer* ever! *Florida summer lasts until mid-November.

I was actually throwing shit around my office at work when I was posting yesterday. I have a meeting with HR today to discuss.

New trailer looks awesome. Definitely looking forward to this!

Such a funny series. I liked them showing a bit of a warmer side to the characters this week.

My mom loves her 480 month old.

Sorry, I was saying ban him instead of making stupid fucking rules to make a point that the creation of the rule was retarded. My personal position, however, is not to ban anyone(as it has always been). Shaw them and leave it at that.

I don't want anyone banned. My stance was always not banning or locking/moving shaw threads. Just shaw the offender and leave them in the shaw to post how they want.

No. F16 is timeless.

Oh, so now Jews get their own victory lap thread?!

Autistics usually have trouble with nuance.

Looking over the Hall of Shame right now, I don't see any threads that were mainly shaw threads, except the two that were moved there today. The rest were epic retarded threads that were moved from normal forums into the Hall of Shame.

I actually don't put celery in my egg salad, but I know a lot of people do.

Egg salad. That said, I agree that it's mainly for aromatic and cooked down.

We got charts and graphs up in this motherfucker?!

Shaw'd member doing a victory lap:

I'm the one who brought it up, so I'm clarifying that it's the community. If you don't believe that I personally also complained about it, I'm ok with that. We're talking about the community hating changes here, not other mods.

This is why I voted for you.

Uh...we're talking about the community, not the mods specifcally. The community most definitely hated on Draegan for doing that. You're more than welcome to read through the ancient Amod thread posts to review.

And everyone(including me) roasted him for doing it.

I did answer it, however stupid the answer is. You're the only one harping on that shit. Ask Amod Thread

It's called an example. If Draegan made the same rule you did, all the usual suspects would have been bitching about it(and rightly so).

Bitch, please. Had Draegan locked Big P's thread because Tanoomba was being a faggot, I would have been calling that shit out as well. You keep projecting your obsession with Tanoomba on me and it couldn't be more misplaced.

I'm saying ban him instead. Ban him instead. hodj, just in case you missed it: ban him instead. EDIT: ban him instead. Copy?

You know what I mean, dude. He shouldn't be the source of new rules for this community. If he's that much of a burden, there is a much simpler solution that will not affect the rest of the community(no matter how trivially this really affects us).

No, for reasons.

Then he should be banned and not have tailor made rules built around him.

I didn't say anything about tradition in the post. You are most definitely making new and/or changing rules. There was no "No personal threads in the shaw" rule on FOH.

I wouldn't ban him here either, but I would ban him before I start changing rules of the entire forum just to somehow punish him. I don't feel he's done anything ban worthy, but you're already aware that my bar is pretty high for that. Too high? Perhaps.

Ok, so we're just going to start changing shit around to punish Tanoomba instead of banning him? You don't find that utterly retarded? I'm not defending Tanoomba. He's only collaterally defended by me complaining about the change. He was only collaterally protected in the GamerGate thread by me...

Defend Tanoomba? So is that what we're doing? So then this change is only in reaction to Tanoomba? Is that true @a_skeleton_03

Because shaw'd people can't post in them in screenshots. Person gets shaw'd. Person can post in shaw. The rest of the zoo can go into the shaw and taunt them. This is our way. Moving the threads doesn't really seem to accomplish anything. I don't know.

I have no power, so I'm not trying to enforce anything. I'm complaining about a change. That's all. You should be well versed in that stance. The fact that Tanoomba is punished(not sure how?) with this change is the only reason you're beating your dick over it.