Search results

yeah then why have I read about prison guard unions spending money to lobby to do things like keep 3 strike laws on the books, or keep marijuana a criminal offense? edit: California Prison Guards Union Pushes For Prison Expansion Union Of the Snake: How California's Prison Guards Subvert...

lol social sciences

lol, no. they're just a symptom

did they put the greek houses under double secret probation?

You think that's the source of political correctness?

condem express complete disapproval of, typically in public

you're getting a bunch of resistance probably because you're condemning the person wearing blue socks, to some people that's offensive and you look like a dick.

It depends if you collectively act like pussies they'll take you over, look in mexico, the mormons fight the gangsters off but a lot of people just accept it, the lack of solidarity makes it easier for them to kill a bunch and put their bodies in the street.

yeah it's more than that it's like a gangster that gets angry with you if you wear blue socks.

political Islam exists and it acts like a gangster from time to time and they try to hold sway against the law the same way gangsters do, Christianity used to be the highest law and what you would call needlessly antagonistic behavior allowed you a moderate position to begin with.

she's probably equating lack of wanting to trash the judicial system to saying there's a denial

also it's not "extremists" that's another aspect of the problem tanoomba it's islam trying to be the highest authority that's the problem, the states that islam controls do things like pay money to kill people who "insult" islam, another one beheads people in the holiest place of islam, imagine...

nobody does because you're a contradictory mess that try's to live in these tiny gaps.

no, it's a real thing you have to deal with, because religion has in the past and present used legal and social pressure to shield their own intolerance. religion is the thing that most often calls for censorship for a reason. and no you're wrong btw, by saying never in the absolute sense...

that is of course unless the problem is your tolerance of intolerant hate

I got my parents off aol subscription when they had broadband and just wanted the email, they didn't even know it was free, but the interesting part was the salesman on the phone telling me all the stuff that comes with the subscription cause I asked him why I would even consider paying it...

I am threatening to kill you, then rape you, then hack you, but not hurt you.

you can share a little tanoomba, what's the most antagonistic thing you've done?

you really think you "got me" on some fantasy scenario you concocted but even in it's infantile smugness it's as juvenile as an insult as it is a complete thought. I have actually done something very similar having eaten psychedelic mushrooms which was grown with manure, reconstituted if you...

you seem to be immune to the idea of the logical consequences of your own ideas.

yes actually, if something pissed you off you're saying you wouldn't take a moment to express that?

did happen thanks for saying it

thanks for answering that you are respecting islam because you fear violence. do something i'm not supposed to? I do it all the time sometimes solely to affirm my lack of constraint by those whom I don't recognise authority.

here's another question tanoomba, do you think any of the current theocracies in the world will give up their power without antagonism and conflict? none of the previous ones did.

there is no person qualified to decide that quaid and that's exactly why the right to offend is critical to free speech

if there's no inherent respect then why do you not want people to draw muhammed why do you care at all? and by respect I mean the same way the mafia gains "respect".

also you still haven't addressed the inherent respect you have for a belief by self censoring yourself to its whims. You sidestepped it by trying to reframe the question I asked.

^see every post where you take agency away from islamists and place 100% of all action on one party.

being pissed off is the choice of one of the parties, you cannot claim that it's a one way street, what the other party chooses to be pissed off about is part of the equation. The fact that islam claims a special right up to and including violence for drawing the prophet muhammed you should find...

how is it being an asshole if you aren't inherently respecting that it's insulting to that belief? by acknowledging that drawing muhammad it somehow disrespectful you're automatically at some level respecting the belief.

you don't have a point to misunderstand, you just try to live in the gaps between sides you spineless wonder.

yeah tanoomba, the bullies are cartoonists not the religious gangster fascists that control massive oil wealth and use it to literally spread hatred of jews and westerners to billions of people, sometimes I wonder how retarded you are then I see you post in a thread that literally calls you...

alchemist being able to give an permanent aghs to anyone while taking up no slot seems insane

"Pretty weak" you know what wasn't weak the force it took to pull kevin loves arm out of its socket.

"tangled up" = yanking someones arm out of the socket, you can stop being a homer for boston anytime now.

Hodj argues like my mother, voluminously

didn't the russians prescribe "psychologists" to dissidents who basically tortured them? and psychology in russia still is still stained with fear and loathing?

actually nuremburg is a perfect example of why hodj is wrong now that I think about it, the top nazi's like goring and Hess ect HAD to be dealt with and were rightly dealt with, but all the mid level nazi scientists and intelligence or military officers that america needed to compete with Russia...

Go look at how they had to shut up Goring at Nuremberg because there was no way to convict him against his logic and they said that his line of reasoning and defense was forbidden for all other defendants.