Search results

And yet study after study has shown that men are more likely to settle in with one sexual partner if given the choice than women are. That whole "hypergamy" and ovulation shit the RPers spout on about is actually (physiologically speaking) true. They just twist it into some weird, demented...

So you think men never feel an emotional connection to their sexual partner? Also, women aren't nearly as attached to emotions and "feelings" as you make them out to be in regard to sex. They too can "just fuck". As a single man, I can assure you of that.

Sex with you sounds terrible man. I love foreplay and sex is way better when it's not just "wam-bam"

You have no idea what you're talking about.

Men have trouble with that too.

You know that Newtonian gravity eventually was seen to have problems too right? A problem that mystified everyone even though it was a "law". Just sayin'

Heddy is good but overrated. Gandhi-Bot and Double Sunshine are better in my opinion.

Based purely on conjecture, pretty much any new enhancement made to Java in the last 5 years was stolen from .NET and C#

You're not allowed to call me out Soygen!!!! Time is an illusion. A donkey will always be a donkey. It doesn't magically turn into a stud after 10 years of hard donkey labor.

Well I stand by my acceptance vs communication statements but I dont know why I was being such a shit about it. Sorry Master! I had a little too much vino last night.

I'll acquiesce as well... so long as you can provide pork or women. I demand pork or women!!!!!!!

Tad communicates, Mist Communicates, Tanoomba communicates. They actually never stop communicating. Most of us wish they would though. Get it? Iannis is probably my favorite poster. He probably seems out of his mind to most, but to me he's as logical as they come.

I'm not hostile. I might be currently undersexed though.

Alright, you win. I accept that you win. Your definition is more succinct than mine.

You just described acceptance. Congratulations.

AKA, acceptance. Jesus christ why are you people arguing with me and against me at the same time? Do you even realize that's what going on?

That's called acceptance. Which is my point. You can communicate with your enemies. You can SOEmote your fucking enemies. You can pretend you're gonna let your enemies have this week's Vex Thal. It doesn't mean shit.

So you agree, acceptance is the key. What most of you seem to be missing is everyone communicates. Literally everyone. 5 year olds communicate. Information is always being relayed. Some of us have just never grown up and still stick our fingers in our ears and scream "lalalala I can't hear...

You're proving my point. If you can accept each other's point of view it will work, if you can't then it won't. It's about acceptance, not communication.

Slow cook it or smoke it for hours, but if you want cuban sandwiches don't pull it. Slab it. That's a really cuban right there.

Eh I can't help it. I'm not actually being hostile, I'm just from Long Island.I don't agree with The Master and I think "communication" as the key to relationships is a bullshit copout that doesn't actually mean anything. Honestly, do any of you who have been divorced or had failed relatinships...

I'm communicating my objection in perfect iambic pentameter. You aren't nearly as smart as you like to pretend. Go dance it off.

He isn't saying anything controversial. He's saying nothing of substance. He's regurgitating sentence after sentence of words that mean nothing. His entire quoted diatribe is akin to saying "The color green is green because that's what everyone says is green"

You are more full of shit than Ayn fucking Rand. You are literally saying "If you don't talk, nothing can be said". Thanks Columbo.

Again, that's acceptance. Not "communication". You can "communicate" until you're blue in the face. If your partner doesn't accept your point of view it's a moot point. I know plenty of couples that scream at each other. They have no problem "communicating" their views and beliefs. But they...

This seems logical but in practice it isn't. Communication when it involves almost nothing but "I don't approve" is not communication. Which is why I emphasized acceptance over communication. Trust me, communicating "I don't agree with you" over and over again doesn't get you anywhere.

I think the greatest point those "market saturation" graphics drove home is.... you have about a 50/50 shot on your education being meaningful in your career. If you get into non managed code, your degree will help you immensely. If you get into managed code you'll piss and moan that your degree...

I'm starting to think you're full of shit. An open relationship has nothing to do with "communication" and everything to do with acceptance. I think you're a big bag of holier than thou wind after experiencing it myself.

You aren't being taken advantage of. People need all kind of different things to feel fulfilled and it's impossible for one person to fulfill all of those things. Don't feel slighted. It really is impossible to expect one person to be everything you need, yet we still do it. It's a lesson in...

Would you leave her because you want to feel like a strong human being who won't be taken advantage of or do you want to leave her because you honestly feel betrayed and can't even look at her anymore? Those are two very different things and one allows an amicable parting of ways if the two...

The hardest thing that I ever had to come to terms with was that it's OK when people change and relationships don't work out. It's not anyone's fault when two people don't work romantically. It really isn't. I tormented myself for close to two years over a woman I thought I would never get over...

Tree house is very good. But it's not worth salivating over. In my opinion this brewery is much more worth salivating over: OEC - Please Verify Your Age

East coast has to import the hops to make good IPAs but there are a few out here that are worth talking about and none of them are from DFH. Lawson's Double Sunshine (actually I prefer their single IPA, sip of sunshine) and New England's Gandhi Bot are both really good. And if anyone wants...

I used to have very idealistic, strong views on relationships with sex and fidelity being the cornerstone of those relationships. Over time I've come to realize that I really don't think it's important to expect another human being to give up any portion of their autonomy just for your own sake...

Is this your wife's sister or your wife's sibling's wife? I need to know how turned on I should feel.

Looks like in the past 5 years returns have been a bit better for FSEVX. /shrug You should be able to see the performance of all funds available to you directly through your 401(k) website or portal.

Is the Vanguard total market index available in your 401(k) program?

What the fuck are you talking about? Where did I suggest being a dickhead and fucking the place up? I simply told him to figure out what his rights as the tenant are. Also, you have absolutely no idea what you're talking about. Paperwork and lawyers magically make your shit theirs? Quick...

So much conflicting information. Some of you say that's just not how it works anymore, others say the woman still gets half of everything AND the kids. If she's an alcoholic freeloader and you can prove she's drinking and driving when picking up the kids will they still seriously give her...

If that's true how would she get custody instead of him?