Search results

Its always one goat and one car in second round. Its just Monty has a 99.9% chance of having the car to your .1% chance.

I suggest it be changed to "There is no Third Box!"

Monty only removes goats though. Monty will only end up holding a goat if you chose the car in a 1 in 1000 pick. Monty chooses second and auto holds the car if you didn't choose it. His odds of getting car are 99.9% and yours are .1%. Then you get to decide if you want your box are Monty's box...

The odds of you having the right door is .1% the odds of Monty having the right door are 99.9%. The key is that Monty always throws away all wrong choices except for the possibility of being stuck with one wrong choice at end becase you chose the one correct answer before Monty. The odds of...

No there were three doors two goats and one car. You had a 33% chance of picking the car and Host has a 66% chance of having the car at the end of round one. The slight of hand is that host has tricked you into thinking its a 50/50 chance in round two. Its not the 66% chance that host has the...

The first round had rules that impacted the second round and the right answer in both rounds was the same box. I didn't change simply because it wasn't revealed in first round. If you don't want to acept that host has a 66% chance of having the right box at end of first round then so be it but...

In the original your choice has a 33% chance of being the correct Box. Do you disagree?

No its based on the odds of you having picked the right box in round one. You can't win tell the end of round two but what happened in round one are still impacting the odds in round two.

In your set up you have a 50% chance of picking a Goat while in the original set up chances of you picking a goat are 66%.

Do you agree you have a 33% chance of picking the right box in first round? If you assign other two box's to Host then Hosts chance of having the right box is 66%. If host eliminates a incorrect box 100% of the time at end of the first round that shifts chance of hosts single remaining box...

At the end of the first round after Host eliminates a Box what are the odds of the Host holding the right box to the contestants chances of holding the right box? Ignore round two for now just focus on the odds as they stand at the end of round one. What people are trying to tell you that...

Just ignore the second round and look at chances of Host having the right box at end of first round. Host always gets two box's a base 66% chance of having the right box. Then host gets rid of a wrong Box. His remaining Box now has a 66% of being the right box to your box's 33% chance. The...

Ok I think I get it. Host has two choices compared to contestants one choice host has a 66% chance of having the right box and eliminates a wrong box every time in first round. Leaving host with a chance of having the winning box 66% of the time at start of second round. Contestant has a 33%...

I have to agree with Araysar.

That was something I was thinking about a few years ago. Make a small amount content focused on a limited geographic area then build the world out slowly from there. You don't start with a whole world you just start with a starting city and areas around it. After that you add next areas with the...

Need to add -No Google to look up the answers on

Seems like a plan now that EQN has crushed are souls by turning into EQDisney we need another thread to theory craft in.

Yep now plane just has to fly up and out of render distance and missiles will miss.

Most honest feedback is going to be negative. What people didn't like and what they would like to see changed is the majority of what they will tell you about. No one is going to tell you that your game has nice dirt graphics in it they will however tell you that the dirt graphic is missing in x...

Nice set up she knows Zimmerman is almost always armed so any "he threatened me with a gun claim" would likely be believed because he was armed. Zim must be a fucking Jedi to have known not to be armed this time. Now his lawyers can play her lying 911 tape in court and she wont get jack.

Assad on the other hand will never be elected leader of Syria in a fair election.

Don't get mad at me for the perverted thing people did in second life I never played that game. But note that game did peak at almost twice the number of subscribers as EQ did. So someone sure played that game allot. SoE seems to actually be going down same path second life blazed with player...

Just do a google search for second life porn.

Doesn't matter what Obama's people want to do Congress is not going to approve a strike against Syria. So they can take the fig leaf Putin has offered them are they can take nothing and look even more foolish.

Quote Originally Posted by khalid View Post I could cherrypick quotes from the wiki also and claim you need to educate yourself on the other end. Just remember, Lumie is on your side with this one. Think on that. What if I start pulling quotes from books I have at my side and type them out? I...

Second life was hardcore in its own special way.

US carriers at the time all carried nuclear weapons. Shifting from there to a nuclear attack on Egypt is a leap of logic not supported facts. Step back just five years prior to Cuban missile crisis to see how such a potential situation would have played out. If US was anywhere close to the use...

He was not on the plane that he claims made the recording. The NSA says the plane didn't make any recordings. Personally given the choices given I'm supposed to believe claims of a nutcases who originally claimed US was about to nuke Egypt in 1967 over a government agency that has a history of...

No I'm saying your source is a nutcase and if you want to make your case find another source. I have zero obligation to disprove your statements given the basic reality that you have nothing but a nutcase to support it.

That NSA lies doesn't mean everything you read on internet is the truth.

Your own fucking post you motherfucking idiot

How do you prove something that didn't happen didn't happen? Why is burden on me to prove Araysar's claims are false when he hasn't proven them correct.

Your source is a nutcase. I'm not making claims you are if the event happened as your nutcase claimed then there would be hundreds of people in chain of command that would be able to verify it and large amounts of documents to support it as well.

One no proof of this. You posted claims of tapes supporting this but not the tapes. The tapes released were made after the attack of Israeli search and rescue efforts that happened well after the attack. Two see point one. Three not relevant to anything simply sound military tactics.

Your source is a nutcase. Now go find another that will confirm US was about to attack Egypt in 1967 not using your original nutcases as the source of there information.

Complete Nonsense please go find any real credible info that suggests US was going to attack Egypt in 1967. A nutcase saying US was about to nuke Egypt in 1967 doesn't count. If LBJ was going to nuke Eygpt why didn't he nuke the hell out of Vietnam?

No it wasn't. Arabs were aligned with Soviets and Israel was more of a French ally not a US ally at that time. US wasn't going to send troops to protect Syria from the Jews when it had real national interests in the fight. US has avoided direct involvement in all Israeli conflicts until after...

What was the US going to do? Ill give you the answer they weren't going to do anything so the attack had no impact but to set off 50 years of conspiracy theories. Its very possible that some leftwing commie sympathazing Isreali military personal decided to attack a US navy ship without going up...

Well that at least would have been something positive. My guess is all he did was just learn the existing SoE system of making games and will now take that knowledge into a new mmo project.

So what exactly did he do in the six months he was back with SoE?