4Chan User Stephen Streams Suicide Attempt - Sets Himself on Fire

He didn't set himself on fire, he lit some cardboard and paper and shit on fire via a toaster and then hid under his bed after taking a bunch of sleeping pills and vodka. Pretty sure he's fine, but I think a 90 year old dude actually died from the fire. That shit happened near my house.

video?

loser even in death ahah

If he did not die, and some other dude did I hope this 4fag goes to jail for murder- if the fire he set is indeed the same fire as that who killed some(any)one.

I can accept that some people decide to end their own lives but they have to be really screwed up to choose "death by fire", not take enough drugs to knock themselves out so they're still typing under the bed, and do it in a place that could burn down other people's houses, belongings, and kill them.

So yeah, he should rot in a prison cell on suicide watch without any internet for a few decades.

What happened to just eating a shotgun? its damn near fool proof.

I TOLD YOU I WAS HARDCORE

AM I COOL ON THE INTERNET YET GUYS HEHE MEME

xadion_sl said:

If he did not die, and some other dude did I hope this 4fag goes to jail for murder- if the fire he set is indeed the same fire as that who killed some(any)one.

Click to expand...

It would be manslaughter, but I do hope he would get maximum sentence

Malakriss_sl said:

I can accept that some people decide to end their own lives but they have to be really screwed up to choose "death by fire"

Click to expand...

.

Trollface_sl said:

why not hanging?

Click to expand...

How is he going to go under his bed and type on a computer if he is hanging????

Vinyard_sl said:

How is he going to go under his bed and type on a computer if he is hanging????

Click to expand...

how do people do it while jerking off?



...didn't know there was a difference.

Noodleface_sl said:

It would be manslaughter, but I do hope he would get maximum sentence

Click to expand...

Couldn't you argue it is second degree murder instead? I mean, he did light a fire in a place that is connected to other domiciles and knowingly put them at risk. Isn't manslaughter like a true accident that results in the death of someone, but you are only at fault due to negligence or carelessness? Everything about what he did was intentional.

I don't know, either way I wished he had succeeded

Probably be hard to argue that he lit the fire intending to kill someone besides himself (if he even intended to kill himself in the first place instead of just crying for attention). I don't know what the law requires for murder charges vs manslaughter but wouldn't it be kind of similar to trying to get a murder charge on someone for drunk driving because they intentionally got behind the wheel while shitfaced?

Maybe he'll be lucky enough to live in a state that has felony murder.

Rangoth_sl said:

Couldn't you argue it is second degree murder instead? I mean, he did light a fire in a place that is connected to other domiciles and knowingly put them at risk. Isn't manslaughter like a true accident that results in the death of someone, but you are only at fault due to negligence or carelessness? Everything about what he did was intentional.

Click to expand...

Is that the same logic applied that lets 13 year olds tried as adults? He didn't try to to kill that other guy, he didn't want to kill him. He's worse than your typical /b/tard, but why isn't the law good enough here?

Let's just be arbitrarily harsh.

Just redefine all laws into two lines:

Anyone who does something or fails to do something is guilty of a crime. If and what the punishment is, is determined by a court of law.