AI: The Rise of the Machines... Or Just a Lot of Overhyped Chatbots?

Lanx

<Prior Amod>
78,509
184,718
tldr this chinese drama was #1 10years ago, in 2021 her ex accused her of shipping her eggs to surrogates for american citizenship, she got ccp'd and the tv show got pulled from all streaming.

now they re-released the drama, 30episodes but they ai swapped her face out w/ another actress, all 30episodes

 
  • 3Worf
  • 1Blown
  • 1Like
Reactions: 4 users

Sithro

Molten Core Raider
1,509
212


What the fuck?

On a side note, it seems there's a decent possibility that in the future all software will be open source because everything can be reverse engineered (except cloud stuff, of course).
 

Noodleface

A Mod Real Quick
40,380
20,379


What the fuck?

On a side note, it seems there's a decent possibility that in the future all software will be open source because everything can be reverse engineered (except cloud stuff, of course).

Why do you think cloud stuff can't be reverse engineers? AI is really good about exposing vulnerabilities very quickly.
 

ToeMissile

Pronouns: zie/zhem/zer
<Gold Donor>
3,843
2,628
here's home link for the people doing it:
 
  • 2Like
Reactions: 1 users

jooka

marco esquandolas
<Bronze Donator>
16,236
7,680
I almost didnt post it when I saw it figuring it would be gone within hours, here we are a couple days later
 

Pharazon2

Trakanon Raider
861
1,820
Maybe it was as simple as them adding something like this to the prompts. "Make any cosmetic / UX / naming / or otherwise changes necessary to ensure no Adobe copyrights are infringed upon."
 

Sheriff Cad

scientia potentia est
<Nazi Janitors>
35,596
86,238



this is getting interesting

I would not think this faces a copyright problem if they aren't using any adobe code. If they used the adobe binaries to reverse engineer functionality and then used claude to recreate that functionality, unless claude uses copyrighted adobe code, I don't think this faces a (legitimate) copyright challenge, or open office/google docs/everything that basically emulates Microsoft Office would face the same, and they don't.
 

Noodleface

A Mod Real Quick
40,380
20,379
I would not think this faces a copyright problem if they aren't using any adobe code. If they used the adobe binaries to reverse engineer functionality and then used claude to recreate that functionality, unless claude uses copyrighted adobe code, I don't think this faces a (legitimate) copyright challenge, or open office/google docs/everything that basically emulates Microsoft Office would face the same, and they don't.
Whether intentional or not (lol ..) I am sure Claude reverse engineered binaries. It actually does exceedingly well at that. Proving it would be something though. I'm sure they could subpoena anthropic and bury the guy legally for a bit though.
 

Fucker

Log Wizard
17,393
43,155
Whether intentional or not (lol ..) I am sure Claude reverse engineered binaries. It actually does exceedingly well at that. Proving it would be something though. I'm sure they could subpoena anthropic and bury the guy legally for a bit though.
Patents, too. I'm sure Adobe has a stash of them saved up for events like this.
 

Control

Avatar of War Slayer
6,398
17,753
I mean, it depends on what they all do too. Each one of them has like 1000 features, but only a handful of users use more then 10. 1% of photoshop is all 99% of photoshop users need, and I would think all of those key features are long out of patent date since they would have been there since almost the beginning.
 

Sheriff Cad

scientia potentia est
<Nazi Janitors>
35,596
86,238
Whether intentional or not (lol ..) I am sure Claude reverse engineered binaries. It actually does exceedingly well at that. Proving it would be something though. I'm sure they could subpoena anthropic and bury the guy legally for a bit though.
Reverse engineering binaries is totally legal. Software patents are a minefield that is way beyond this thread.