- 49,246
- 199,429
They've been greenlit for more excavations now that the tourism infrastructure is in place.
- 1
Ancient Civilizations
- Thread starter Kiroy
- Start date
- 49,246
- 199,429
- 49,246
- 199,429
Send a little robot with a camera down there already. Same with under pyramids. F'in Zawi Hawass.
- 1
- 49,246
- 199,429
I'm pretty sure these aren't voids they are seeing. The whole area would need to be excavated. Likely nothing will be done before humanity gets wiped out again.
- 1
Are you a subscriber to ECDO, crustal shift theories etc? Its scary how many questions those theories could answer... like all the way back from Gobekli Tepe, to Pyramids, Sphinx erosion, ubiquitous flood stories, all the way to alien "disclosure", covid, "climate change" and other pieces - these theories could allow all the pieces to fit together as much as anything.
- 1
- 49,246
- 199,429
Of course. I follow all the great accounts that SWM interacts with and several subgroups of theirs too. It's solid work they are doing. The next cycle will most likely kick it all off.
- 1
- 1
not sure on the crustal shift stuff, but there is a magnetic shift theory as well, where-i think this is how it goes- once the poles get far enough off from rotational axis, the earth rotates to compensate and bring the magnetic poles more in line with rotational poles. resulting in earthquakes tidal waves etc as the world "rotates" about 40 degrees to re-align the poles. which would work as well.
where i live is fucked if that happens, not as bad as say the west coast of usa or western eur (water tidal waves-should- be moving west to east and northeastish and my area -while by the coast - would be shielded by land to our south- for northeasterly moving tidal waves...
wish people in charge were more forthcoming on the stuff on the plateau,, and turkey and etc..
side note, apparently there is a dept at the university of virginia that tracks reincarnation stories -especially from children and they just published a paper suggesting that it might actually be real and sudden death seems to suggest faster rebirth. (i saw the headline and went woah)
where i live is fucked if that happens, not as bad as say the west coast of usa or western eur (water tidal waves-should- be moving west to east and northeastish and my area -while by the coast - would be shielded by land to our south- for northeasterly moving tidal waves...
wish people in charge were more forthcoming on the stuff on the plateau,, and turkey and etc..
side note, apparently there is a dept at the university of virginia that tracks reincarnation stories -especially from children and they just published a paper suggesting that it might actually be real and sudden death seems to suggest faster rebirth. (i saw the headline and went woah)
- 2
Its similar - there are at least a couple different theories on how it may happen. In one, earth's crust decouples from the mantle, and the weight of the ice of the poles causes the whole crust to shift, 45 degrees or so. Einstein was even open to the idea, up until his death. Then 10 years later or so Chan Thomas put out his Adam and Eve story describing what he thought happened, and the CIA classified it. They finally declassified only a small portion of it in 2013, 50 years after he had written it.
ChatGPT summary on Einstein's relation to the idea:
Yes. Albert Einstein seriously entertained the possibility that Earth's crust could periodically shift relative to the planet's rotational axis, potentially causing enormous geographical and climatic changes. And we have unusually strong documentary evidence of his thinking: personal letters, mathematical arguments, and a foreword he wrote endorsing further investigation of the idea.
What's particularly interesting is that Einstein went considerably further than simply saying the hypothesis deserved investigation. At one point, he expressed the belief that repeated, relatively rapid shifts of Earth's crust had actually occurred.
However, there's an important distinction: Einstein wasn't proposing that the entire Earth periodically flipped over or reversed its rotation. He was considering whether the planet's relatively rigid outer crust could move over the underlying layers, effectively relocating the geographic poles relative to the continents.
In the early 1950s, Einstein corresponded with Charles Hapgood, an American researcher developing a theory called Earth Crust Displacement.
Hapgood believed that ice accumulated unevenly near the poles could create rotational forces large enough to shift the crust, possibly repeatedly throughout geological history.
Einstein corresponded with him between 1952 and 1955 and contributed the foreword to Earth's Shifting Crust.
He wrote:
After examining Hapgood's evidence, Einstein wrote:
That's a striking statement. It shows that, at least at that point, Einstein regarded the occurrence of relatively rapid historical crustal shifts as more than just a speculative possibility.
In correspondence with geologist William Farrington, he worked through mathematical questions about whether an off-center mass could create sufficient force to displace Earth's crust.
A surviving letter contains handwritten equations, angles, and a diagram.
He concluded:
He described Hapgood's idea as original and potentially important to our understanding of Earth's history.
He laid out the proposed mechanism: unevenly accumulated polar ice could produce centrifugal effects, eventually shifting the crust relative to the Earth's interior.
But he also identified a crucial uncertainty: whether the crust could actually move sufficiently easily over the underlying material.
In other words, Einstein found both the historical evidence and the physical reasoning intriguing, but he had not established that the mechanism would work.
ChatGPT summary on Einstein's relation to the idea:
Yes. Albert Einstein seriously entertained the possibility that Earth's crust could periodically shift relative to the planet's rotational axis, potentially causing enormous geographical and climatic changes. And we have unusually strong documentary evidence of his thinking: personal letters, mathematical arguments, and a foreword he wrote endorsing further investigation of the idea.
What's particularly interesting is that Einstein went considerably further than simply saying the hypothesis deserved investigation. At one point, he expressed the belief that repeated, relatively rapid shifts of Earth's crust had actually occurred.
However, there's an important distinction: Einstein wasn't proposing that the entire Earth periodically flipped over or reversed its rotation. He was considering whether the planet's relatively rigid outer crust could move over the underlying layers, effectively relocating the geographic poles relative to the continents.
1. The strongest evidence: Einstein's correspondence with Charles Hapgood
Bonhams : EINSTEIN, ALBERT. 1879-1955. Carbon Copy of a Letter to William Farrington ANNOTATED AND DIAGRAMMED in ink and pencil by Einstein describing in mathematical detail the action of force on the earth's crust,In the early 1950s, Einstein corresponded with Charles Hapgood, an American researcher developing a theory called Earth Crust Displacement.
Hapgood believed that ice accumulated unevenly near the poles could create rotational forces large enough to shift the crust, possibly repeatedly throughout geological history.
Einstein corresponded with him between 1952 and 1955 and contributed the foreword to Earth's Shifting Crust.
November 24, 1952 — Initial interest
Einstein told Hapgood he had encountered the idea that uneven polar ice could cause significant movements of the crust.He wrote:
He also cautioned that geological and paleontological evidence would be essential because the available knowledge was insufficient to settle the matter through mathematical calculations alone.
May 8, 1953 — A much stronger endorsement
This is arguably the most revealing letter.After examining Hapgood's evidence, Einstein wrote:
He went on to say that substantial shifts of the crust appeared to have occurred repeatedly and over short periods.
That's a striking statement. It shows that, at least at that point, Einstein regarded the occurrence of relatively rapid historical crustal shifts as more than just a speculative possibility.
January 1954 — Einstein examines the physics
Einstein didn't just lend his famous name to Hapgood's theory.In correspondence with geologist William Farrington, he worked through mathematical questions about whether an off-center mass could create sufficient force to displace Earth's crust.
A surviving letter contains handwritten equations, angles, and a diagram.
He concluded:
This is particularly important evidence because it demonstrates active engagement with the proposed mechanism, not merely an enthusiastic reaction to an interesting theory.
2. Einstein's 1954 foreword: his most definitive public statement
In May 1954, Einstein wrote a foreword for Hapgood's book, eventually published in 1958, three years after Einstein's death.He described Hapgood's idea as original and potentially important to our understanding of Earth's history.
He laid out the proposed mechanism: unevenly accumulated polar ice could produce centrifugal effects, eventually shifting the crust relative to the Earth's interior.
But he also identified a crucial uncertainty: whether the crust could actually move sufficiently easily over the underlying material.
In other words, Einstein found both the historical evidence and the physical reasoning intriguing, but he had not established that the mechanism would work.