The Paranormal, UFO's, and Mysteries of the Unknown

Kiroy

Kiroy

Marine Biologist
<Bronze Donator>
34,615
99,894
TJT said:
Yeah. Even the academics agree that Gobekli Tepe was built 12000 years ago. If we follow the main lens then mankind was fucking around doing Clan of the Cave Bear shit and fighting with neanderthals at this time.

Meanwhile, a society had become efficient enough (farming) to have a wide swathe of specialist workers in stone masonry, engineering, art, etc to build Gobekli Tepe out in Turkey. So, in order for this to work with that narrative, this society had to create itself in a vacuum and be a complete isolate when compared to every single other pocket of human civilization. Which is completely absurd.
Click to expand...

And like I said, Gobekli is one of many tepe's, and once you look into the flawed dating at a lot of sites with megalithic activity, you start to realize that it's pretty likely that most of them, all around the world, are pre 12k bc and have been built on top off by later, post cataclysm civs. Even most of the pyramids have megalithic foundations which don't match the pyramid on top.
 
Chukzombi

Chukzombi

Millie's Staff Member
71,666
212,886
Kiroy said:
And like I said, Gobekli is one of many tepe's, and once you look into the flawed dating at a lot of sites with megalithic activity, you start to realize that it's pretty likely that most of them, all around the world, are pre 12k bc and have been built on top off by later, post cataclysm civs. Even most of the pyramids have megalithic foundations which don't match the pyramid on top.
Click to expand...
there is also the problem of not excavating beyond a certain depth. if science says X people only lived in X spot during X period of time. there is no reason to dig any deeper than that level in the ground. there could be entire cities buried in the ground, but since we never dig below the "established" timeline, we will never know.
 
  • 1Solidarity
Reactions: 1 user
Kiroy

Kiroy

Marine Biologist
<Bronze Donator>
34,615
99,894
Chukzombi said:
there is also the problem of not excavating beyond a certain depth. if science says X people only lived in X spot during X period of time. there is no reason to dig any deeper than that level in the ground. there could be entire cities buried in the ground, but since we never dig below the "established" timeline, we will never know.
Click to expand...

ya if I was a musk type billionaire this would be my mission, needs to be waaaayyyyy more underwater excavation too considering how many ancient cities were likely along a coastline that doesn't exist anymore
 
  • 1Solidarity
Reactions: 1 user
Chukzombi

Chukzombi

Millie's Staff Member
71,666
212,886
Kiroy said:
ya if I was a musk type billionaire this would be my mission, needs to be waaaayyyyy more underwater excavation too considering how many ancient cities were likely along a coastline that doesn't exist anymore
Click to expand...
they're being found.
5_sunken_cities_excavation_images.jpg

Lost cities #6: how Thonis-Heracleion resurfaced after 1,000 years under water
archeologists-find-the-a-lost-egyptian-city-that-might-be-atlantis-x-photos-220.jpg

archeologists-find-the-a-lost-egyptian-city-that-might-be-atlantis-x-photos-26.jpg
 
  • 3Like
Reactions: 2 users
MusicForFish

MusicForFish

Ultra Maga Instinct
<Prior Amod>
31,818
124,850
Too many rookies shitting up the thread. Shut up and do some research. Tired of your perceptions of reality. The narrative has been controlled for decades. And is still being actively controlled, even with the strides taken by Hancock, Shock, many others and the great information distribution of the internet.
Yes, sometimes the theories are super fucked up. I mean, Ancient Aliens is pretty out there. Spacemen? Aliens? More like advanced civs wearing helmets. But they have put a spotlight on these ancient sites. Which has put the whole concept of our narrated history into question world wide. The more we dig, the more we discover and fill in the blanks. And yet, Modern Day Academia still refutes every bit of it. More concerned with control over the money they get from keeping the status quo than truth.

Anyways...I'm rambling again.

Enjoy a new vid by our fav Indian dude.

 
  • 3Like
  • 1Dislike
Reactions: 3 users
TJT

TJT

Mr. Poopybutthole
<Gold Donor>
40,927
102,720
MusicForFish said:
Too many rookies shitting up the thread. Shut up and do some research. Tired of your perceptions of reality. The narrative has been controlled for decades. And is still being actively controlled, even with the strides taken by Hancock, Shock, many others and the great information distribution of the internet.
Yes, sometimes the theories are super fucked up. I mean, Ancient Aliens is pretty out there. Spacemen? Aliens? More like advanced civs wearing helmets. But they have put a spotlight on these ancient sites. Which has put the whole concept of our narrated history into question world wide. The more we dig, the more we discover and fill in the blanks. And yet, Modern Day Academia still refutes every bit of it. More concerned with control over the money they get from keeping the status quo than truth.

Anyways...I'm rambling again.

Enjoy a new vid by our fav Indian dude.

Click to expand...

A dude who lived near us when I was growing up was a marine electrician and historian. I'll remember his name later today. Anyway, he mostly wrote articles and stuff for various history related journals about the history of seafaring in our corner of the world, the Pacific Northwest. The history of what ship did what, who went where, etc. Below was the dude's own rabbit hole. This is the Basque Number system, as far as I know it is still used today in Basque Country area of France for various things. The Basque have been seafaring a long time but the question was how long?

Anyway, super cool dude to talk to. The Basque number system here is base 20. Now, you can find evidence of this scrawled all over places in Canada and parts of the USA. Many, many centuries before Europeans supposedly found the New World. Which threw into question the entire understanding of exactly when people began circling the globe. Which throws into question everything else. This kind of thing isn't even contested really anymore in marine history... it just isn't part of mainstream knowledge. At all.

Albaola history - San Sebastian museum - basque maritime heritage -> Basque's in Newfoundland in the 16th Century and they were out and about long before any of this.

1548066335136.png
 
  • 2Like
  • 1Dislike
Reactions: 2 users
BrutulTM

BrutulTM

Good, bad, I'm the guy with the gun.
<Silver Donator>
14,430
2,215
Kiroy said:
And like I said, Gobekli is one of many tepe's, and once you look into the flawed dating at a lot of sites with megalithic activity, you start to realize that it's pretty likely that most of them, all around the world, are pre 12k bc and have been built on top off by later, post cataclysm civs. Even most of the pyramids have megalithic foundations which don't match the pyramid on top.
Click to expand...

What would lead you to believe that the dating for Gobekli Tepe is correct and all of the other ones are wrong?
 
  • 2Like
Reactions: 1 users
MusicForFish

MusicForFish

Ultra Maga Instinct
<Prior Amod>
31,818
124,850
Matter of fact, since I'm feeling frosty this morning, here ya go.

Built 6,000 Years Before Stonehenge, Gobekli Tepe Is The Oldest Temple In The World
March 9, 2012. The archaeologists who first found Gobekli Tepe in the 1960s didn't think it was anything more than a medieval graveyard. ... Radiocarbon dating has confirmedthat this temple really was built 11,500 years ago, making it easily one of the most significant archaeological discoveries in recent history.
 
Chukzombi

Chukzombi

Millie's Staff Member
71,666
212,886
MusicForFish said:
Matter of fact, since I'm feeling frosty this morning, here ya go.

Built 6,000 Years Before Stonehenge, Gobekli Tepe Is The Oldest Temple In The World
March 9, 2012. The archaeologists who first found Gobekli Tepe in the 1960s didn't think it was anything more than a medieval graveyard. ... Radiocarbon dating has confirmedthat this temple really was built 11,500 years ago, making it easily one of the most significant archaeological discoveries in recent history.
Click to expand...
These people really will jam their heads in the sand and deny reality at all costs.
 
  • 1Like
Reactions: 1 user
Void

Void

Experiencer
<Gold Donor>
9,412
11,077
MusicForFish said:
Shut up and do some research. Tired of your perceptions of reality. The narrative has been controlled for decades. And is still being actively controlled
Click to expand...

Chukzombi said:
These people really will jam their heads in the sand and deny reality at all costs.
Click to expand...

I get that you guys probably get a little tired of people naysaying, particularly people that haven't done all the "research" that you guys have. I feel the same way at times with the people I work with, just in the opposite direction. And maybe these past couple pages have been exasperating with a few people coming in and giving contradictory opinions. But look at these two statements and tell me that those "invite discussion." Or is that not the purpose of this thread? Is it only for like-minded people to congregate? I'm asking seriously, because maybe I misunderstood and I've been following this thread for the wrong reasons.
 
  • 1Like
Reactions: 1 user
Kiroy

Kiroy

Marine Biologist
<Bronze Donator>
34,615
99,894
Void said:
Or is that not the purpose of this thread? Is it only for like-minded people to congregate? I'm asking seriously, because maybe I misunderstood and I've been following this thread for the wrong reasons.
Click to expand...

both is fine, people can post what and how they want as long as it's within the very minor rules of the forum

and for BrutulTM BrutulTM

It's just my general belief after reading / watching a lot of stuff. It could be wrong on either side, but the claim is that archaeologists will often cherry pick the material to carbon date from specific spots in the strata to get the date they are looking for. This is obviously easier and tougher given the circumstances of the site, but you can go over all the dating methodologies on the published papers for each specific site and draw a conclusion to how fair and accurate the dating might be.

Some rockstars will pull the data out of the hard to read published paper and make it a bit easier for the layman, sort of like this:

How old is it? Dating Göbekli Tepe.

This 'blog post' should be perfect for you because this guy is actually skeptical towards the end at the way the dating material for gobekli was presented and highlights the overarching problem with dating and how it's presented by archaeologists.
 
Chukzombi

Chukzombi

Millie's Staff Member
71,666
212,886
Void said:
I get that you guys probably get a little tired of people naysaying, particularly people that haven't done all the "research" that you guys have. I feel the same way at times with the people I work with, just in the opposite direction. And maybe these past couple pages have been exasperating with a few people coming in and giving contradictory opinions. But look at these two statements and tell me that those "invite discussion." Or is that not the purpose of this thread? Is it only for like-minded people to congregate? I'm asking seriously, because maybe I misunderstood and I've been following this thread for the wrong reasons.
Click to expand...
calling people dumbasses and morons for having opposing views isnt constructive to this thread, outright denying carbon dating which is accepted science by all parties in order to bolster a narrative is also not constructive. they have found wood inside the Great Pyramid, but will not allow it to be carbon dated or the results released publicly. there is a narrative being pushed. as long as people are willing to engage in civil debate is always fine.
 
  • 1Like
Reactions: 1 user
Chukzombi

Chukzombi

Millie's Staff Member
71,666
212,886
Dalven said:
I love this stuff generally but apparently this one was built by some sheep shagger Aberdeenshire farmer in the 90s according to the BBC
Click to expand...
At least there was an answer in this case. it is odd the whole town knew about it for that long and never reported it to the historical society or whatever they call it over there.
 
  • 1Like
Reactions: 1 user
BrutulTM

BrutulTM

Good, bad, I'm the guy with the gun.
<Silver Donator>
14,430
2,215
MusicForFish said:
Matter of fact, since I'm feeling frosty this morning, here ya go.

Built 6,000 Years Before Stonehenge, Gobekli Tepe Is The Oldest Temple In The World
March 9, 2012. The archaeologists who first found Gobekli Tepe in the 1960s didn't think it was anything more than a medieval graveyard. ... Radiocarbon dating has confirmedthat this temple really was built 11,500 years ago, making it easily one of the most significant archaeological discoveries in recent history.
Click to expand...

And that is different technology than what Chuk and Kiroy are saying is wrong in the case of other buildings?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.