Bitcoins/Litecoins/Virtual Currencies

Flobee

Vyemm Raider
2,609
3,002
Meanwhile coinbase playing pop up games begging me to stake all my shit for 3%. Maybe somehow worth since I was just calling it lost money and waiting for the 5 year maybe it will turn around. Talking a whopping $350 down from 1k.
The biggest lesson learned in this last cycle is that earning "yield" on crypto is a scam. Don't do it. I was using Blockfi and fortunately got out before it imploded, but that yield you're earning is coming from degenerate gamblers betting with your capital. Not a good market.
 

Flobee

Vyemm Raider
2,609
3,002
Regarding the price drop, its worth noting that BTC often sniffs out larger market moves earlier than other 'risk assets'. Be interesting to see if anything materializes. Also... BTC is essentially being long volatility, this sort of move should surprise no one.
 
  • 1Solidarity
Reactions: 1 user

Creslin

Trakanon Raider
2,375
1,077
Regarding the price drop, its worth noting that BTC often sniffs out larger market moves earlier than other 'risk assets'. Be interesting to see if anything materializes. Also... BTC is essentially being long volatility, this sort of move should surprise no one.
ya I have been wondering the same, BTC dropped massively about a month before the last couple crashes in the nasdaq and S&P. Coming up with a theory for the link is difficult though so it may just be shapes in the clouds.
 

Flobee

Vyemm Raider
2,609
3,002
ya I have been wondering the same, BTC dropped massively about a month before the last couple crashes in the nasdaq and S&P. Coming up with a theory for the link is difficult though so it may just be shapes in the clouds.
Best theory I've heard is that BTC represents the last and only true a open market (with all the pluses and minuses attached to that) it is also incredibly liquid. As such its the first asset liquidated to cover margin calls in other markets. So BTC sells first to cover margin calls, then other assets follow once the capital runs out to cover. COVID crash was a liquidity event, I would suspect that something similar is possible in the current environment.
 

Intrinsic

Person of Whiteness
<Gold Donor>
14,288
11,759
I made like $60k on it in 2021. I haven’t bought nor sold any crypto since 2021.

Biggest thing I even own in crypto is almost 80,000 TrueBit which has went down to 1/4 of its value. All bought with house money.

I really haven’t at all followed crypto in the two years since. I’d only buy any more of it which has a noted real world usage.

I still “like” TrueBit as a gamble as it does have a theoretical usage if it’s ever adopted, and the team behind it is notable at least.

Do I ever expect it to really take off? Ehhhh. Don’t care either way, but cool if it does. Personally I don’t see dabbling in crypto again any time soon.

I still have all my TrueBit also. Once we reach the moon and cash out we'll have to buy some small islands somewhere with hookers and blow all day!
 
  • 1Solidarity
Reactions: 1 user

Izo

Tranny Chaser
18,533
21,408
Bruce Lee Meme GIF by Justin
 
  • 1Diamond Hands
Reactions: 1 user

Flobee

Vyemm Raider
2,609
3,002
So a new whitepaper just came out for Bitcoin. Proposal requires no changes to Bitcoin (no softfork) and would allow for turing complete smart contracts to be used with verification/proof on-chain. I've historically disliked attempts to do this on BTC but this implementation seemingly has little to no on-chain affect. Turing complete smart contract capabilities are undeniably powerful and the main reason a developer would choose something like ETH over BTC. If this works as proposed RIP 💩coins.

Funnily enough I guess the proposal is similar to ya'lls favorite 💩coin Truebit... but without the predatory pre-mined coin distribution. I'm not claiming to fully understand if/how this would work long term.

whitepaper

article discussing
 

Asshat wormie

2023 Asshat Award Winner
<Gold Donor>
16,820
30,964
The biggest signal is bullshit is when words are attached to things that sound complex but are actually meaningless in the context. "Turing complete" is one such thing.
 

Flobee

Vyemm Raider
2,609
3,002
The biggest signal is bullshit is when words are attached to things that sound complex but are actually meaningless in the context. "Turing complete" is one such thing.
Tell me more about how you don't know anything about computer science.

Edit: To avoid a 100% useless post, it just means that it can simulate any other general purpose computer or programming language in terms of output. Its not complex at all
 

Asshat wormie

2023 Asshat Award Winner
<Gold Donor>
16,820
30,964
Tell me more about how you don't know anything about computer science.

Edit: To avoid a 100% useless post, it just means that it can simulate any other general purpose computer or programming language in terms of output. Its not complex at all
Tell me more how you don't understand what I wrote. Or better yet, tell me how adding "Turing complete" as used in that paper is in any way meaningful to the thesis of that paper. And feel free to explain it as if I had degrees in CS and math because I do. Thanks!
 

Flobee

Vyemm Raider
2,609
3,002
Tell me more how you don't understand what I wrote. Or better yet, tell me how adding "Turing complete" as used in that paper is in any way meaningful to the thesis of that paper. And feel free to explain it as if I had degrees in CS and math because I do. Thanks!
Just read the conclusion man. You don't need me to explain it to you

1696961060193.png


BitVM claims it can fill a gap in the current bitcoin scripting language so it would be theoretically capable of expressing all tasks accomplishable by computers. Thus "Turing complete". This is the main limitation that led Vitalik to create Ethereum and all the rest of the altcoin garbage that spun from that point.

EDIT: To be fair I guess the point is you didn't understand why they were doing this and I misunderstood what you were trying to say
 
Last edited:

Asshat wormie

2023 Asshat Award Winner
<Gold Donor>
16,820
30,964
Just read the conclusion man. You don't need me to explain it to you

View attachment 494492

BitVM claims it can fill a gap in the current bitcoin scripting language so it would be theoretically capable of expressing all tasks accomplishable by computers. Thus "Turing complete". This is the main limitation that led Vitalik to create Ethereum and all the rest of the altcoin garbage that spun from that point.

EDIT: To be fair I guess the point is you didn't understand why they were doing this and I misunderstood what you were trying to say
The thing is a way to do off chain computation and relate them to the blockchain in an extremely limited way. Turing completeness off chain was ground breaking when Turing was alive. Adding the term "Turing complete" to this turd is just a way to hype up a bs news article in order to attract more eyes.
 

Flobee

Vyemm Raider
2,609
3,002
The thing is a way to do off chain computation and relate them to the blockchain in an extremely limited way. Turing completeness off chain was ground breaking when Turing was alive. Adding the term "Turing complete" to this turd is just a way to hype up a bs news article in order to attract more eyes.
You seem to be failing to understand what this means in context.

There is a scripting language built into Bitcoin, this is a whitepaper about a new method to utilize that scripting language. This would make Bitcoin scripting language Turing complete which it currently is not. This allows for Bitcoin transaction to have significantly more complex scripts written into them and the on-chain proofing being used as a source of truth. In its current state these would be (practically) limited (due to the nature of Bitcoin transactions and this initial implementation) to 2-party transactions where one party is proving execution of some code, and the other is verifying that said code was executed.

There is tons of room to be skeptical about whether or not this is useful or will produce anything of value, you're just biting on an irrelevant portion. Yes, taking computation offline obviously improves the scope of what can be done, no that may not be useful. I certainly don't fully understand where this is going, just that its interesting. We'll see.
 

Big Phoenix

Pronouns: zie/zhem/zer
<Gold Donor>
44,679
93,390
I just spent 15 minutes hearing a coworker talk about their love of bored ape nfts and crypto in general.

They didnt change their mind when i told them its all money laundering and pump and dump scams all then way down. It started out funny because i assumed they where being sarcastic but nope, they actually love nfts and stuff.
 
  • 1Tendies
Reactions: 1 user

Asshat wormie

2023 Asshat Award Winner
<Gold Donor>
16,820
30,964
I just spent 15 minutes hearing a coworker talk about their love of bored ape nfts and crypto in general.

They didnt change their mind when i told them its all money laundering and pump and dump scams all then way down. It started out funny because i assumed they where being sarcastic but nope, they actually love nfts and stuff.
Should have asked him to explain how NFTs are like land.
 
  • 3Worf
Reactions: 2 users

Sanrith Descartes

Veteran of a thousand threadban wars
<Aristocrat╭ರ_•́>
41,503
107,559
I just spent 15 minutes hearing a coworker talk about their love of bored ape nfts and crypto in general.

They didnt change their mind when i told them its all money laundering and pump and dump scams all then way down. It started out funny because i assumed they where being sarcastic but nope, they actually love nfts and stuff.
Should have asked if you could see their NFTs and then take a pics of them
 
  • 3Worf
Reactions: 2 users

Big Phoenix

Pronouns: zie/zhem/zer
<Gold Donor>
44,679
93,390
Bruhs it gets even worse. Ran into them as I was leaving and talked about crypto again and they literally used "hodl" in describing them not selling shibaeno or whatever shitcoin and missing out on $15000 in profit.

The craziest thing about this person is they arent some 20 year old zoomer. They have a very respectable, professional job and would be the last person you would expect to be invovled in shitcoins and nfts. They also mentioned the metaverse and they really want it to become a thing. Just so wtf.
Should have asked if you could see their NFTs and then take a pics of them
LOL i may do that. I tried telling them the blockchain doesnt contain any picture or media data at all, that its completely disconnected from the picture. They still tried to explain to me how both are one and the same.
 
Last edited:
  • 1Like
Reactions: 1 user