Bitcoins/Litecoins/Virtual Currencies

Arden

Blackwing Lair Raider
2,933
2,215
What does any of that matter? None of that changes the base foundation that Bitcoin is built on. And who the fuck is basing anything on “those coins being permanently dormant?” Everyone knows there are (will be) 21 million bitcoin. Nobody I have ever encountered has suggested their strategy involves an assumption that one million of them stay dormant. I really don’t understand your point of view.

Markets rely on psychology as much as math. No one says their whole strategy is based on Satoshi’s coins staying dormant, but those coins have been untouched for 15+ years and are generally treated as lost. That absolutely affects perceived circulating supply and investor confidence.

If those wallets suddenly spring to life, it’s not just about 1M BTC existing (we already know that), it’s about 1M BTC potentially being moved, sold, or used to influence the market.

There would definitely be a crash. How much of a crash and how permanent it is would depend on what happens after the wallets go active. If they were to dump, that would definitely be catastrophic for btc.

To be clear, this issue has been on my radar for years and I'm more of a btc bull now than ever. But I'm also realistic enough to consider the risks of the ongoing assumption that Satoshi is dead and his coins are forever gone.

If you want the cynical perspective- Satoshi pretending he is dead and patiently waiting for btc to take over the world is a genius fucking move.
 
  • 1Like
  • 1Picard
  • 1Truth!
Reactions: 2 users

Seananigans

Honorary Shit-PhD
<Gold Donor>
14,732
37,710
Markets rely on psychology as much as math. No one says their whole strategy is based on Satoshi’s coins staying dormant, but those coins have been untouched for 15+ years and are generally treated as lost. That absolutely affects perceived circulating supply and investor confidence.

If those wallets suddenly spring to life, it’s not just about 1M BTC existing (we already know that), it’s about 1M BTC potentially being moved, sold, or used to influence the market.

There would definitely be a crash. How much of a crash and how permanent it is would depend on what happens after the wallets go active. If they were to dump, that would definitely be catastrophic for btc.

To be clear, this issue has been on my radar for years and I'm more of a btc bull now than ever. But I'm also realistic enough to consider the risks of the ongoing assumption that Satoshi is dead and his coins are forever gone.

If you want the cynical perspective- Satoshi pretending he is dead and patiently waiting for btc to take over the world is a genius fucking move.

From my point of view, “market” isn’t something that applies to Bitcoin. But I can see how you could have this perspective given the clownish absurdity of the status quo.
 

Arden

Blackwing Lair Raider
2,933
2,215
From my point of view, “market” isn’t something that applies to Bitcoin. But I can see how you could have this perspective given the clownish absurdity of the status quo.

Going to have to explain this one to me.
 
Last edited:

tugofpeace

Pronouns: zie/zhem/zer
1,267
3,026
From my point of view, “market” isn’t something that applies to Bitcoin. But I can see how you could have this perspective given the clownish absurdity of the status quo.

So if tomorrow we hit hyperinflation, you don't think bitcoin price will adjust to reflect that?
 

Tuco

I got Tuco'd!
<Gold Donor>
49,853
90,608
Because it would destroy the core assumption that those coins are permanently dormant. None of the coins attributed to Satoshi have *ever* been spent or moved. The sudden availability of up to 1 million BTC (about 5% of total supply) could trigger panic selling, crash the price, and undermine trust in BTCs decentralization and stability.

It would raise a ton of questions like whether Satoshi is alive, if his stash has been hacked, etc.
Nope. Hodlers have watched BTC fluctuate so dramatically that a sudden sell-off of 5% of the supply would just be the latest in many changes in price.

1751809224734.png
 

Blazin

Creative Title
<Nazi Janitors>
7,461
37,444
From my point of view, “market” isn’t something that applies to Bitcoin. But I can see how you could have this perspective given the clownish absurdity of the status quo.
Markets simply are all possible and existing participants. There is no outside of markets
 

Seananigans

Honorary Shit-PhD
<Gold Donor>
14,732
37,710
Markets simply are all possible and existing participants. There is no outside of markets

Which market is being referenced in this case? Bitcoin is a singular thing, there is no alternative. The crypto market? I guess I’ll grant you that for anyone only using bitcoin as a speculative gambling vehicle like the rest of that “crypto” garbage, sure maybe they will move elsewhere.

If you’re suggesting there’s a coherent market for “store of value,” then.. ok, but nothing Arden Arden is talking about changes bitcoin’s place as the superior store of value based on sound money principles. That’s what I’ve been saying.

I cannot see any way in which what’s being discussed is not completely irrelevant. An additional portion of existing bitcoin being potentially moved around does not, at all, affect the underlying principles suggesting bitcoin is a superior store of value.
 

Blazin

Creative Title
<Nazi Janitors>
7,461
37,444
Which market is being referenced in this case? Bitcoin is a singular thing, there is no alternative. The crypto market? I guess I’ll grant you that for anyone only using bitcoin as a speculative gambling vehicle like the rest of that “crypto” garbage, sure maybe they will move elsewhere.

If you’re suggesting there’s a coherent market for “store of value,” then.. ok, but nothing Arden Arden is talking about changes bitcoin’s place as the superior store of value based on sound money principles. That’s what I’ve been saying.

I cannot see any way in which what’s being discussed is not completely irrelevant. An additional portion of existing bitcoin being potentially moved around does not, at all, affect the underlying principles suggesting bitcoin is a superior store of value.
In this instance the bitcoin market is anyone who owns bitcoin or could own bitcoin . When we talk of supply and demand for anything the source of that supply and demand is this nebulous term "market" which comprises all possible sources of supply and demand for the thing in question.

What I'm not quite sure of is in what way you are using the term and what it means to you. That might help us understand what you are meaning. Bitcoin is so obviously at the whims of the market it's like saying water is wet so you are likely trying to convey something else.
 
  • 1Like
Reactions: 1 user

Flobee

Vyemm Raider
2,877
3,361
Some additional context on that 80k Bitcoin that was untouched for 14 years then moved the other day. Has some interesting context I wasn't aware of. TLDW - Some weirdo was creating some quasi legal threats if the coin didn't move from the address it would be considered "abandoned".

 
  • 1Like
Reactions: 1 user

Arden

Blackwing Lair Raider
2,933
2,215
Btc sailing.

Bloomberg Terminal has switched its scale to show Bitcoin in Millions. It's currently 0.116M for one Bitcoin
 
  • 4Like
  • 2Mother of God
Reactions: 5 users

Kithani

Blackwing Lair Raider
1,493
2,020
Holy fuck. I didn’t research if true, but assuming it is…..a wallet moving shit after 14 years? Wtf?

did someone who forgot they bought Bitcoin find their wallet? A big player taking action? I find it near impossible that any normal human wouldn’t have sold off like 1 million worth at some point during the rise to fund their life. Almost feels like a takeover.

for those of us not super knowledgeable about the private key thing. Let’s assume I die and I have the key to my wallet. Is there a way, at all, from a technical perspective, to access that wallet? My understanding is the answer is no but I’m starting to wonder with tweets like that
Maybe some dude was selling drugs for Bitcoin, got caught and locked up for 14 years
 

Jysin

Bronze Baronet of the Realm
6,953
5,229
BTC > $121k

I’m up 35%+ since my dip buy foray into crypto months ago. Just why oh why didn’t I put more in? 😩
 
  • 2Like
  • 2Solidarity
Reactions: 3 users

TJT

Mr. Poopybutthole
<Gold Donor>
44,774
118,120
BTC > $121k

I’m up 35%+ since my dip buy foray into crypto months ago. Just why oh why didn’t I put more in? 😩
No day like today to put more in and sit on it! While pullbacks do happen. I just buy as I have cash and sit on it and continue to do so. Hasn't failed me yet.
 
  • 1Like
  • 1Solidarity
Reactions: 1 users

Flobee

Vyemm Raider
2,877
3,361
I'm no bear, nor am I a big believe in charts but this is worth being aware of I think if I were considering buying right now. Lines on a chart only matter if people care about them, but most traders seem to care about them so worth keeping in mind. We keep ripping and breaking this trend starts to look super bullish

 

Sanrith Descartes

You have insufficient privileges to reply here.
<Gold Donor>
47,808
136,406
I'm no bear, nor am I a big believe in charts but this is worth being aware of I think if I were considering buying right now. Lines on a chart only matter if people care about them, but most traders seem to care about them so worth keeping in mind. We keep ripping and breaking this trend starts to look super bullish


Melt-ups are like strippers. They look great and you think what could go wrong. Then you check your bank account in the morning.
 
  • 1Worf
  • 1Truth!
Reactions: 1 users

TJT

Mr. Poopybutthole
<Gold Donor>
44,774
118,120
I'm no bear, nor am I a big believe in charts but this is worth being aware of I think if I were considering buying right now. Lines on a chart only matter if people care about them, but most traders seem to care about them so worth keeping in mind. We keep ripping and breaking this trend starts to look super bullish


If you hold for years it don't matter.
 
  • 1Solidarity
  • 1Truth!
  • 1Like
Reactions: 3 users