Bitcoins/Litecoins/Virtual Currencies

Haus

I am Big Balls!
<Gold Donor>
18,517
76,505
Yeah banks starting to wake up to the existential danger crypto poses to them. Their arrogance has made them slow to the punch here, but they can hit more than hard enough to make up for being slow- as we are seeing.

Essentially crypto is here to do to banks what online retailers did to brick and mortar ones....
 
  • 2Like
Reactions: 1 users

Sheriff Cad

scientia potentia est
<Nazi Janitors>
30,773
72,520
Essentially crypto is here to do to banks what online retailers did to brick and mortar ones....
I think banks have a lot more political power than brick and mortar retailers, and their fighting back will be a lot more effective.
 
  • 1Truth!
Reactions: 1 user

Arden

Vyemm Raider
3,089
2,386
I think banks have a lot more political power than brick and mortar retailers, and their fighting back will be a lot more effective.

Also far fewer of them, which means it's easier for them to collaborate (collude) towards the common goal of opposition.

Ultimately a losing battle for them though, I think- which if you believe in capitalism is good for consumers.
 

Arden

Vyemm Raider
3,089
2,386
Screenshot 2026-01-27 174615 - Copy.png


Only a matter of time until things rotate to BTC and we get a new ath. They need to address the fucking quantum stuff though- it's seriously holding everything back.
 
Last edited:
  • 1Mother of God
Reactions: 1 user

Arden

Vyemm Raider
3,089
2,386
Quantum fears putting downward pressure on BTC.

BTC community has been slow to address the concerns.

Add to that the market apparently doesn't like Trump's most likely pick for Fed.
 
Last edited:

Flobee

Ahn'Qiraj Raider
3,119
3,638
Quantum fears putting downward pressure on BTC.

BTC community has been slow to address the concerns.

Add to that the market apparently doesn't like Trump's most likely pick for Fed.
FUD over quantum is midcurve stuff honestly. Adopting a "quantum safe" algorithm would be relatively simple to do. If the chain was blindsided by it and got hacked, it would be fairly simple and likely not even all that controversial to select a chainstate before the obvious hack and revert. Would do irreparable damage to trust in Bitcoin for sure, but its not particularly difficult from a technical standpoint.

Now discussions about -which- quantum safe algorithm to choose and when to implement that is hotly debated, and actively so if you're listening to the right people. Quantum simply isn't a short term threat so the discussions about solutions get overshadowed by FUDsters. You won't see consensus on something like this until its apparent that its needed. Pressure on this front via FUD is probably good long term, but I don't see it as a looming threat realistically.

Now prematurely adopting the wrong algorithm... specifically one that has a undisclosed vulnerability? Thats deadly. Not something to be rushed and those pushing for urgency here may have ulterior motives worth considering.