Bitcoins/Litecoins/Virtual Currencies

Haus

Haus

I am Big Balls!
<Gold Donor>
18,520
76,510
Arden said:
Yeah banks starting to wake up to the existential danger crypto poses to them. Their arrogance has made them slow to the punch here, but they can hit more than hard enough to make up for being slow- as we are seeing.
Click to expand...

Essentially crypto is here to do to banks what online retailers did to brick and mortar ones....
 
  • 2Like
Reactions: 1 users
Cad

Sheriff Cad

scientia potentia est
<Nazi Janitors>
30,773
72,522
Haus said:
Essentially crypto is here to do to banks what online retailers did to brick and mortar ones....
Click to expand...
I think banks have a lot more political power than brick and mortar retailers, and their fighting back will be a lot more effective.
 
  • 1Truth!
Reactions: 1 user
Arden

Arden

Vyemm Raider
3,090
2,387
Cad said:
I think banks have a lot more political power than brick and mortar retailers, and their fighting back will be a lot more effective.
Click to expand...

Also far fewer of them, which means it's easier for them to collaborate (collude) towards the common goal of opposition.

Ultimately a losing battle for them though, I think- which if you believe in capitalism is good for consumers.
 
Arden

Arden

Vyemm Raider
3,090
2,387
Screenshot 2026-01-27 174615 - Copy.png


Only a matter of time until things rotate to BTC and we get a new ath. They need to address the fucking quantum stuff though- it's seriously holding everything back.
 
Last edited:
  • 1Mother of God
Reactions: 1 user
Arden

Arden

Vyemm Raider
3,090
2,387
Quantum fears putting downward pressure on BTC.

BTC community has been slow to address the concerns.

Add to that the market apparently doesn't like Trump's most likely pick for Fed.
 
Last edited:
Flobee

Flobee

Ahn'Qiraj Raider
3,119
3,638
Arden said:
Quantum fears putting downward pressure on BTC.

BTC community has been slow to address the concerns.

Add to that the market apparently doesn't like Trump's most likely pick for Fed.
Click to expand...
FUD over quantum is midcurve stuff honestly. Adopting a "quantum safe" algorithm would be relatively simple to do. If the chain was blindsided by it and got hacked, it would be fairly simple and likely not even all that controversial to select a chainstate before the obvious hack and revert. Would do irreparable damage to trust in Bitcoin for sure, but its not particularly difficult from a technical standpoint.

Now discussions about -which- quantum safe algorithm to choose and when to implement that is hotly debated, and actively so if you're listening to the right people. Quantum simply isn't a short term threat so the discussions about solutions get overshadowed by FUDsters. You won't see consensus on something like this until its apparent that its needed. Pressure on this front via FUD is probably good long term, but I don't see it as a looming threat realistically.

Now prematurely adopting the wrong algorithm... specifically one that has a undisclosed vulnerability? Thats deadly. Not something to be rushed and those pushing for urgency here may have ulterior motives worth considering.
 
  • 1Like
Reactions: 1 user
Arden

Arden

Vyemm Raider
3,090
2,387
Flobee said:
FUD over quantum is midcurve stuff honestly. Adopting a "quantum safe" algorithm would be relatively simple to do. If the chain was blindsided by it and got hacked, it would be fairly simple and likely not even all that controversial to select a chainstate before the obvious hack and revert. Would do irreparable damage to trust in Bitcoin for sure, but its not particularly difficult from a technical standpoint.

Now discussions about -which- quantum safe algorithm to choose and when to implement that is hotly debated, and actively so if you're listening to the right people. Quantum simply isn't a short term threat so the discussions about solutions get overshadowed by FUDsters. You won't see consensus on something like this until its apparent that its needed. Pressure on this front via FUD is probably good long term, but I don't see it as a looming threat realistically.

Now prematurely adopting the wrong algorithm... specifically one that has a undisclosed vulnerability? Thats deadly. Not something to be rushed and those pushing for urgency here may have ulterior motives worth considering.
Click to expand...

Don't disagree.

The quantum issue itself is a little different than most FUD btc has lived through though, in that the danger here is very real and the consequences of failing to address it would be catastrophically serious.

Like you said though, there is a relatively easy solution (from a technical perspective) and little reason to believe it won't be implemented in time.

Interestingly this is another example of how one bitcoin's biggest strengths, it's decentralized nature, is acting as a weakness- at least when it comes to short term price action.

If Bitcoin had a CEO who could call a press conference and reassure investors that they are well aware of the issue and are already taking steps to fix it, it would alleviate 90% of the concerns.

But if Bitcoin had a CEO then it wouldn't be Bitcoin.
 
  • 1Like
Reactions: 1 user
You must log in or register to reply here.